Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:30:19.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nutritional value and quality of squid (Illex illecebrosus) meal as source of dietary protein for broiler chicken*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2008

H. W. Hulan ,
F. G. Proudfoot  and
C. G. Zarkadas
H. W. Hulan
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada, Research Station, Kentville, Nova Scotia, B4N IJ5, Canada
F. G. Proudfoot
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada, Research Station, Kentville, Nova Scotia, B4N IJ5, Canada
C. G. Zarkadas
Affiliation:
Food Research Institute, Research Branch, Agricultural Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, KIA oC6, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Squid meal (SqM), produced by grinding and drying the whole squid (Illex illecebrosus) common to the northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean, contained 645 g protein/kg and appeared limiting with respect to lysine, methionine and cystine.

2. Although a comparison of the essential amino acid profiles of SqM with other protein concentrates indicated that SqM was higher than fish meal andsoya-beanmeal but lower than casein or whole-egg protein, these tests could not accurately predict protein quality.

3. A new approach is reported for evaluating protein quality of SqM. It was based on the direct chromato-graphic determination of its collagen content, from the amounts of 5-hydroxylysine or 5-hydroxyproline present, and elastin, from the amounts of desmosine or iso-desmosine present. This method can alsobe routinely used to assess the connective tissue content and protein quality of animal protein supplements such as fish, meat-and-bone meals.

4. A nutritional evaluation of SqM as a source of protein for poultry was carried out using 320 male and 320 female Cobb chicks fed from I-d-old to 48 d, a control diet containing 50 g/kg fish meal or test diets containing 50 g, 100 g or 150 g SqM/kg.

5. Feeding of SqM at a rate of up to IOO g/kg diet resulted in optimum biological response and monetary returns.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 163 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1979

References

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1975). Official Methods of Analysis, 12th ed.Washington, DC: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Beckman Instruments Inc. (1976). Methodology Bulletin no. 121 M-A-TB-063. Palo Alto, Calif.Google Scholar
Beckman Instruments Inc. (1976). Methodology Bulletin no. 121 M-TB-004. Palo Alto, Calif.Google Scholar
Beckman Instruments Inc. (1976). Methodology Bulletin no. AA-TB-001–014. Palo Alto, Calif.Google Scholar
Bligh, E. G. & Dyer, W. J. (1959). Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, G. D. (1970). Archs Biochem. Biophys. 141, 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, W. W. (1973). Lipid Analysis. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. (1966). Adv. mar. Biol. 4, 91.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W. (1956). Applied Animal Nutrition. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Drouliscos, N. J. (1976). Br. J. Nutr. 36, 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastoe, J. E. (1967). In Treatise on Collagen, vol. 1, p. 1 [Ramocchandran, G. N., editor]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
FAO/WHO (1965). Tech. Rep. Ser. Wld Hlth Org. no. 301.Google Scholar
Hidiroglou, M. & Zarkadas, C. G. (1976). Can. J. Physiol. Pharmac. 54, 336.Google Scholar
Hochachka, P. W., Moon, T. W., Mustafa, T. & Storey, K. B. (1975). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 52B, 151.Google Scholar
Hubbell, C. R. (1977). Feedstuffs 49, 16.Google Scholar
Hulan, H. W., Hunsaker, W. G., Kramer, J. K. G. & Mahadevan, S. (1976). Can. J. Physiol. Pharmac. 54, 1.Google Scholar
Hulmes, D. J., Miller, A., Parry, D. A. D., Piez, K. A. & Woodhead-Galloway, J. (1973). J. molec. Biol. 79, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, S., Grant, M. E. & Liebovich, S. J. (1970). Experientia 26, 1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. M., Toledo, R. T., Nakayama, T. O. M. & Chichester, C. O. (1974). J. Fd Sci. 39, 735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, T. W. & Hulbert, W. C. (1975). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 52B, 145.Google Scholar
Moore, S. (1963). J. biol. Chem. 238, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. & Stein, W. H. (1963). Merhs Enzym. 6, 819.Google Scholar
Nordwig, A. & Hayduk, U. (1969). J. molec. Biol. 4, 161.Google Scholar
Oser, B. L. (1951). J. Am. diet. Assoc. 27, 396.Google Scholar
Paik, W. K. & Kim, S. (1975). In Advances in Enzymology, vol. 42, p. 227 [Meister, A., editor]. New York: Interscience, John Wiley and Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Partridge, S. M. & Keeley, F. W. (1973). In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 43, p. 173 [Wagner, W. D. and Clarkson, T. B., editors]. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Pikkarainen, J. & Kulonen, E. (1969). Nature, Lond. 223, 839.Google Scholar
Pikkarainen, J., Rontanen, J., Vastamaki, M., Laupiaho, K., Kari, A. & Kulonen, E. (1968). Eur. J. Biochem. 4, 555.Google Scholar
Scott, M. L., Nesheim, M. G. & Young, R. J. (1969). Nutrition of the Chicken. Ithaca, New York: M. L. Scott and Associates.Google Scholar
Sibbald, I. R. (1976). Poult. Sci. 55, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Takahashi, T. (1965). In Fish as Food, vol. 4, p. 339 [Borgstrom, G., editor]. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Templeman, W. (1966). Tech. Bull. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. no. 454, 122.Google Scholar
Varela, G., Pujol, A. & Moreiras, O. (1962). Fish in Nutrition, p. 259. London: Fishing News Ltd.Google Scholar
Vickery, H. B. (1972). In Advances in Protein Chemistry, vol. 26, p. 81 [Anfinsen, C. B. Jr, Edsall, J. T. and Richards, F. M., editors]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ward, D. V. & Wainwright, S. A. (1972). J. Zool., Lond, 167, 437.Google Scholar
Woodham, A. A. & Clarke, E. M. W. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 37, 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodham, A. A. & Deans, P. S. (1975). Br. Poult. Sci. 16, 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodham, A. A. & Deans, P. S. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 37, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarkadas, C. G. (1975). Can. J. Biochem. 53, 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar