Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T07:25:22.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nutritional implications of D-xylose in pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. B. Schutte
Affiliation:
TNO-Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology (ILOB), PO Box 15, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
J. de Jong
Affiliation:
TNO-Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology (ILOB), PO Box 15, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
R. Polziehn
Affiliation:
TNO-Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology (ILOB), PO Box 15, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
M. W. A. Verstegen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Agricultural University of Wageningen, Haagsteeg 4, 6708 PM Wageningen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Hemicellulose consists primarily of pentose sugars, joined together in a polysaccharide chain with d-xylose as the most abundant component. Ileal digestibility and urinary excretion of d-xylose and associated effects of this pentose sugar on ileal and faecal digestibility of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), gross energy (GE) and nitrogen were studied in pigs. Castrated pigs were prepared with a post-valvular T-caecum cannula to measure ileal digestibility. Faecal digestibility was measured in non-cannulated pigs. d-xylose was given at dietary inclusion levels of 100 and 200 g/kg, and the control sugar, d-glucose, at a rate of 200 g/kg diet. Ileal digestibility of d-xylose as well as that of d-glucose was found to be close to 100%. The presence of d-xylose in the diet decreased ileal digesta pH and increased ileal flow of volatile fatty acids, suggesting the occurrence of microbial degradation of d-xylose in the pig small intestine. In pigs fed on the 100 g d-xylose/kg diet, 44.5% of the d-xylose intake appeared in the urine. This percentage increased significantly to 52.6 when pigs were fed on the 200 g d-xylose/kg diet. Ileal and faecal digestibility of DM, OM, GE and N, as well as N retention, decreased significantly in pigs fed on the 200 g d-xylose/kg diet.

Type
Carbohydrate Metabolism
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1991

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1981). The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Arnal-Peyrot, F. & Adrian, J. (1974). Métabolisme des pentosanes de céréale chez le rat. (Metabolism of cereal pentosans in rat.) International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research 44, 543552.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1975). Official Methods of Analysis, 12th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Bogner, P. H. (1961). Alimentary absorption of reducing sugars by embryos and young chicks. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine 107, 263267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, J. R., Boorman, K. N. & Cole, D. J. A. (1977). Nitrogen retention in the pig. British Journal of Nutrition 37, 143155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carré, B. & Brillouet, J. M. (1986). Yield and composition of cell wall residues isolated from various feedstuffs used for non-ruminant farm animals. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 37, 341351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Cori, F. (1925). The fate of sugar in the animal body. 1. The rate of absorption of hexoses and pentoses from the intestinal tract. Journal of Biological Chemistry 66, 691715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. & Cooke, W. T (1960). Diagnostic significance of D-xylose excretion test. Gut 1, 6770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goedhart, P. W. (1990). Experimental design for comparative digestibility trials with pigs: limitations of Latin squares. Animal Production 50, 373378.Google Scholar
Hennig, U., Bock, H. D., Wünsche, J. & Kreienbring, F. (1979) Einfluss des Geschlechtes und der Lebendmasse auf die wahre Verdaulichkeit des Proteins und der Aminosäuren verschiedener Futtermittel bei Schweinen. (The influence of the sex and live mass of pigs on the actual digestibility of protein and amino acids of various feeds.) Archiv für Tierernährung 29, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hof, G. (1980). An investigation into the extent to which various dietary components, particularly lactose, are related to the incidence of diarrhoea in milk-fed calves. PhD Thesis, Agricultural University of Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Imoto, S. & Namioka, S. (1978). VFA production in the pig large intestine. Journal of Animal Science 47, 467487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, A., Fernàndez, J. A. & Jørgensen, H. (1983). The net energy value of diets for growth in pigs in relation to the fermentative processes in the digestive tract and the site of absorption of the nutrients. Livestock Production Science 10, 171186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longstaff, M. A., Knox, A. & McNab, J. M. (1988). Digestibility of pentose sugars and uronic acids and their effect on chick weight gain and caecal size. British Poultry Science 29, 379393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loos, M. (1954). Studies in the utilization of pentoses in diabetes. Acta Medica Scandinavica 148, 425431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McConnell, J. C., Barth, K. M. & Griffin, S. A. (1971). Nutrient digestibility and nitrogen metabolism studies at different stages of growth with fat and lean type swine fed two levels of protein. Journal of Animal Science 32, 654657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McConnell, J. C., Barth, K. M. & Griffin, S. A. (1972). Nitrogen metabolism at three stages of development and its relationship to measurements of carcass composition in fat and lean type swine. Journal of Animal Science 35, 556560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. M. & Lewis, H. B. (1932). Pentose metabolism. 1. The rate of absorption of D-xylose and the formation of glucogen in the organism of the white rat after oral administration of D-xylose. Journal of Biological Chemistry 98, 133140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeley, C. C., Bentley, R., Makita, M. & Wells, W. W. (1963). Gas liquid chromatography of trimethylsilyl derivatives of sugars and related substances. Journal of the American Chemical Society 85, 24972507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Es, A. J. H. (1987). Energy utilization of low digestibility carbohydrates. In Low Digestibility Carbohydrates, pp. 121127 [Leegwater, D. C., Feron, V. J. and Hermus, R. J. J., editors]. Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, P., Huisman, J., Verstegen, M. W. A., van Baak, M. J., van Kleef, D. J., van Weerden, E. J. & den Hartog, L. A. (1988). A new technique for collection of ileal chyme in pigs. In Proceedings of the VIth International Symposium on Digestive Physiology in the Pig, pp. 289296. [Buraczewska, L., Buraczewski, S., Pastuszewska, B. and Zebrowska, T., editors]. Jablonna Poland: Polish Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
van Weerden, E. J. (1959). The osmotic pressure and the concentration of some soluble components of the intestinal contents and the faeces of the cow, in relation to the absorption of minerals. PhD Thesis, Agricultural University of Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Wagh, P. V. & Waibel, P. E. (1966). Metabolizability and nutritional implications of L-arabinose and D-xylose for chicks. Journal of Nutrition 90, 207211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagh, P. V. & Waibel, P. E. (1967 a). Alimentary absorption of L-arabinose and D-xylose in chicks. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine 124, 421424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagh, P. V. & Waibel, P. E. (1967 b). Metabolism of L-arabinose and D-xylose by chicks. Journal of Nutrition 92, 491496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wise, M. B., Barrick, E. R., Wise, G. H. & Osborne, J. C. (1954). Effects of substituting xylose for glucose in a purified diet for pigs. Journal of Animal Science 13, 365374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar