Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:19:53.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mutation in porcine Zip4-like zinc transporter is associated with pancreatic zinc concentration and apparent zinc absorption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2012

Felicitas Siebert
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Ludwigstrasse 21B, 35390Giessen, Germany Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Physiology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392Giessen, Germany
Gesine Lühken
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Ludwigstrasse 21B, 35390Giessen, Germany
Josef Pallauf
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Physiology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392Giessen, Germany
Georg Erhardt*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Ludwigstrasse 21B, 35390Giessen, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: G. Erhardt, fax +49 641 99 37629, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to analyse the sequence variability of the porcine Zip4-like Zn transporter gene and the association of identified sequence variants with average daily gain, apparent Zn absorption, plasma Zn concentration and Zn concentration in the liver and pancreas. For the purpose of the study, two different sample sets were used. Set one, which was used for sequencing and association analysis, included mRNA from intestinal tissue from thirty-five piglets of a feeding trial. Sample set two consisted of forty-six samples of genomic DNA from sperm or tissue of wild boars and several pig breeds and was used to genotype animals of different breeds. The sequence analysis of porcine Zip4-like complementary DNA in sample set one revealed the presence of seven nucleotide substitutions. Of these, six were synonymous, whereas a substitution of A with C in exon IX (XM_001925360 c.1430A>C) causes an amino acid exchange from glutamic acid to alanine (p.Glu477Ala). The association analysis revealed no influence of the six synonymous substitutions on Zn values, but the non-synonymous nucleotide exchange significantly increased Zn concentration in the pancreas and apparent Zn absorption of the piglets in week 2 of the feeding trial. The parentage of the piglets and the genotyping results in sample set two suggest a breed-specific presence of the A allele in Piétrain for this amino acid substitution. These results indicate that genotype influences the Zn absorption abilities of individual animals, which should be taken into consideration in animal breeding as well as for the selection of experimental animals.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Zn is an essential trace element which is involved in several metabolic pathways. About 2800 proteins of the human proteome contain Zn and up to 10 % of the human coding DNA encodes for Zn-containing proteins(Reference Andreini, Banci and Bertini1). The functional information available until now suggests that a major part of these proteins is involved in the regulation of gene expression(Reference Andreini, Banci and Bertini1). Furthermore, Zn plays an important role as a catalytic centre of several metalloenzymes and as a structural part in protein formations such as the Zn finger(Reference Cousins, Ziegler and Filer2).

Plants, especially cereals, often contain significant amounts of phytic acid, a Zn-complexing agent. Therefore, Zn from plant feedstuff is often poorly available to monogastric animals and humans. Due to this, diets for livestock animals normally need to be supplemented for Zn(Reference McDowell3).

On the other hand, Zn can cause environmental problems if its emission via manure is too high(Reference Jondreville, Revy and Dourmad4). Therefore, the European Commission has limited the Zn concentration in livestock diets to 150 mg Zn/kg diet (Regulation (EC) No. 1334/2003). Among livestock animals, growing piglets have with 100 mg Zn/kg the highest requirement for Zn if it is calculated per kg feed intake(Reference McDowell3, 5, 6). This high requirement does not leave much room for safety margins in view of the European Union regulation. Accordingly, there is a general agreement that these animals need a highly available source of Zn. Much research has been done to investigate the bioavailability of several organic bound Zn sources for piglets(Reference Hill, Peo and Lewis7Reference Hollis, Carter and Cline14), but these studies do not deliver consistent indications that organic binding can significantly improve Zn absorption.

To the best of our knowledge, no research has investigated the influence of genes and their variants on Zn absorption in livestock animals. Moreover, it might also be worthwhile investigating animal-related factors of Zn absorption, such as the genetic variability of the genes encoding for Zn transporter proteins.

There are two different families of Zn transporter proteins: the ZnT and the Zip family. Transporters of the ZnT family facilitate Zn transport from the cytoplasm into cell organelles or the extra-cellular space, whereas transporters of the Zip family transport Zn from the extra-cellular space or cell organelles into the cytoplasm(Reference Lichten and Cousins15). The gene of one transporter of the Zip family, the Zn transporter Zip4 gene (Zip4), also known as SLC39A4, was discovered in the context of acrodermatitis enteropathica, a severe, autosomal recessive inherited Zn deficiency in humans(Reference Kury, Dreno and Bezieau16, Reference Wang, Zhou and Kuo17). Therefore, Zip4 is known to play a major role in intestinal Zn absorption. It is expressed in tissues related to Zn absorption and re-absorption such as the gastrointestinal tract(Reference Kury, Dreno and Bezieau16, Reference Wang, Zhou and Kuo17), kidneys(Reference Kury, Dreno and Bezieau16) and the visceral yolk sac(Reference Dufner-Beattie, Wang and Kuo18).

In humans, several mutations of SLC39A4 are known that lead to severe Zn deficiency syndromes, which might be lethal if untreated(Reference Schmitt, Kury and Giraud19). Among livestock animals, there are similar inherited Zn deficiencies known for cattle(Reference Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan and Bartlett20) and goats(Reference Krametter-Froetscher, Hauser and Baumgartner21). The inherited Zn deficiency in cattle was also shown to be related to mutations in SLC39A4 (Reference Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan and Bartlett20). Besides these described forms of severe inherited Zn deficiency, no further information on the genetic factors influencing the efficiency of Zn absorption exists, nor have there been any sequence variants described in porcine Zn transporter genes until now.

The porcine gene coding for the Zip4 Zn transporter (Zip4-like) is located on chromosome 4, from position 490 789 to 495 010 (GenBank accession no. NC_010446). Like the human Zip4 (Reference Wang, Zhou and Kuo17), the porcine Zip4-like consists of twelve exons and eleven introns. The sequence of the porcine mRNA transcript is also available (GenBank accession no. XM_001925360), whereas no genetic variation is recorded in the dbSNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP, last accessed on 11 August 2011), nor has such a variation been published elsewhere for this pig gene.

Therefore, the aim of the present study was (i) to analyse the sequence variability of the porcine Zip4-like gene and (ii) to test for association of identified sequence variants with average daily gain, apparent Zn absorption, plasma Zn concentration and Zn concentration in the liver and pancreas measured in a previous feeding trial.

Materials and methods

Animals and samples

This study used two different sample sets. Sample set one included mRNA extracted from intestinal tissue originating from thirty-five piglets (barrows) of a previous feeding trial (F Siebert and J Pallauf, unpublished results), which primarily investigated the bioavailability of different Zn sources. This sample set was used to screen the Zip4-like mRNA for sequence variants and to test their possible influence on Zn absorption.

Sample set two was used to check one of the identified polymorphisms in the Zip4-like coding region for its presence in different pig breeds and wild boars. For this purpose, the second sample set consisted of forty-six samples of genomic DNA from sperm or tissue (muscle or testicular tissue) from the domestic pig breeds Piétrain (Pi) (n 9, including five boars siring the piglets of the feeding trial), Deutsche Landrasse (DL) (n 9), and Deutsches Edelschwein (DE) (n 5); the commercial crossings Pi × (DE × DL) (n 8); Pi × Duroc (n 5); Pi × (Duroc × DE) (n 1), and from wild pigs (Sus scrofa scrofa, n 9). With the exception of three wild sows, all animals were boars. All animals of sample set two, except the wild boars and the boars siring the piglets of the feeding trial, were kept on the research and teaching unit ‘Oberer Hardthof’ of the Justus-Liebig University, Giessen.

Phenotyping

During the previous feeding trial, thirty-five Pi × DAN-Breed hybrid weaned, castrated male piglets with an average age of 27 d and 6·46 (sem 0·56) kg mean live weight were used. The animals were acquired from a commercial farm and were the offspring of five different boars. Animals were allocated to one of four experimental groups and received a diet based on maize and soyabean meal (20·2 mg native Zn/kg diet) supplemented with 50 mg Zn from one of four different Zn sources (glycine Zn chelate hydrate, Zn methionine hydroxyl analogue chelate, Zn acetate dehydrate and ZnSO4.7H2O) for 28 d. Animals were kept in stainless steel metabolism cages to facilitate total quantitative collection of urine and faeces during two metabolism periods, one in week 2 and one in week 4 of the trial. During the collection periods, faeces and urine were collected twice daily, weighed, and the aliquots were stored at − 20°C. Feed intake was recorded daily and the animals were weighed weekly. Blood samples were taken on day 0, day 14 and day 28. At the end of the trial, the animals were killed by exsanguination after stunning and samples of the liver and pancreas for Zn analysis and samples of the small intestine for DNA and mRNA extraction were taken. All samples were cooled on dry ice immediately after sampling and were stored at − 70°C before analyses. The animal trial was reported to the veterinary office of the Regional Council Giessen (V54-19 c 20/15 c GI19/3 Nr. A 18/2009).

Diets were dried at 103°C overnight and ashed at 550°C in a muffle furnace. Faecal samples were freeze-dried and ground before ashing at 550°C. Ash was solved in 3 m-HNO3, filtered and diluted by a factor of 10. Organ samples were wet-ashed by incubation with concentrated HNO3. After incubation, the solution was filtered and diluted with aqua bidest., to an acid concentration of 2·8 m. Directly before measurement, 2·5 ml of each urine sample were mixed with 1·8 ml 69 % HNO3 and 5·7 ml aqua bidest., and centrifuged to remove suspended particles.

Zn in faeces, organs and diet was measured by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (Unicam 701 Emission Spectrometer; Unicam Limited). Zn in urine and bone was measured by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS; Thermo S2 AA System, Thermo Electron Corporation). To ensure the quality of measurement, reference probes were measured after every ten samples. Apparent Zn absorption was calculated as Zn intake during sampling periods minus excretion via faeces, expressed as percentage of intake.

Extraction of mRNA, complementary DNA synthesis and extraction of DNA

Extraction of total mRNA from the intestinal mucosal tissue was done with a modified protocol of the acid guanidinum thiocyanate phenol chloroform extraction(Reference Chomczynski and Sacchi22). The volume of the reagents was downscaled by 40 % compared to the original protocol (for economic reasons) and 100 mg of each tissue were used. Concentration and purity of the mRNA were determined photometrically and RNA integrity was checked by a denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis(Reference Chomczynski and Sacchi22). After this, the RNA samples were treated with DNAse and copied to complementary DNA (cDNA) with the Revert Aid kit (MBI Fermentas), according to the manufacturer's protocol.

DNA was extracted from the liver and testicles with the Invisorb DNA Tissue HTS96 Kit (Invitek GmbH) following the kit protocol.

PCR amplification and sequencing of Zip4-like complementary DNA and genomic DNA fragments

For PCR amplification of the complete coding region of the porcine Zip4-like cDNA covered with four fragments, and for amplification of a part of the genomic sequence from intron eight to intron nine, reaction mixes with final concentrations of 1 ×  GoTaq FlexiBuffer, 0·2 mm-dNTP, 2 mm-MgCl2, 0·67 mm-forward primer, 0·67 mm-reverse primer and 1 U GoTaq polymerase (Promega) were used. After denaturation at 94°C for 1·5 min, thirty-five amplification cycles were performed including denaturation at 94°C for 15 s, annealing at a fragment-specific temperature for 20 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, followed by a final 5 min extension at 72°C. Fragment-specific PCR details are given in Table 1.

Table 1 Details of PCR amplification and sequencing of Zip4-like gene fragments

cDNA, complementary DNA.

* Roman numerals: exons; arabic numerals: introns.

Partially amplified.

Amplified PCR products were purified with the MSB® Spin PCRapace system (Invitek GmbH) and sequenced using the Big Dye Terminator version 1.1 cycle sequencing kit and the forward PCR primer. Sequencing reactions were run on a 3130 Genetic Analyzer, following the manufacturer's recommendations for sequencing kit and instrument (Applied Biosystems). If the results were unclear, sequencing was repeated with the reverse PCR primer. Sequences were analysed by visual evaluation of resulting chromatograms supported by ChromasPro version 1.33 (Technelysium Private Limited).

Sequence analysis

For identification of sequence variants, multiple alignments of the Zip4-like cDNA sequences obtained from the thirty-five animals of sample set one and the GenBank sequence XM_001925360 (S. scrofa Zn transporter Zip4-like (LOC100156896) mRNA) as a reference were generated using the ChromasPro software version 1.33 (Technelysium Private Limited).

The same software was used to genotype one of the identified polymorphisms in the Zip4-like coding region in sequences from sample set two by comparing these with the GenBank sequence NC_010446 (S. scrofa breed mixed chromosome 4, Sscrofa9.2).

For alignments of Zip4-like cDNA and translated protein sequences with sequences from other species (GenBank accession numbers: Bos taurus: NM_001046067; Homo sapiens: NM_017767.2; Pongo abelii: XM_002819543; Rattus norwegicus: NM_001101021; Mus musculus: NM_028064.2; Canis familiaris: XM_539217.2), the ‘ClustalW’ function of Chromas Pro was used.

SIFT Blink analysis (http://sift.jcvi.org/www/SIFT_BLink_submit.html) was used to assess whether an identified amino acid exchange might be deleterious for protein function(Reference Kumar, Henikoff and Ng23). Additionally, the BLOSUM62 matrix was consulted to determine whether this amino acid substitution is to be regarded as conservative or non-conservative(Reference Henikoff and Henikoff24). Finally, the possible effect of an identified amino acid exchange on the predicted protein secondary structure was tested with the Profile network from HeiDelberg (PHD) method (http://npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page = /NPSA/npsa_phd.html)(Reference Rost and Sander25).

Statistical analysis

All nucleotide substitutions identified in sample set one were analysed for potential influence on the piglet production data, Zn plasma concentration as well as apparent Zn digestibility by the GLM procedure of the SPSS 19 statistical software (IBM Corporation). The statistical model included genotype and diet fed as fixed effects. Where it improved the model, the interaction of genotype and diet was included in the model. We used the model

$$\begin{eqnarray} y _{ ijk } = \mu + diet_{ i } + genotype_{ j } + diet_{ i }\times genotype_{ j } + e _{ ijk }, \end{eqnarray}$$

where y ijk=the dependent variable (e.g. average daily gain, Zn concentration in plasma, liver and pancreas, apparent Zn absorption), dieti= the diet fed in the feeding trial, genotypej= the genotype of each tested SNP (e.g. SNP 1430: cc and ac) and e ijk= the error term. All variables were normally distributed.

Results

The sequence analysis of the complete porcine Zip4-like cDNA in the thirty-five animals of sample set one, derived from the feeding trial, revealed the presence of seven nucleotide substitutions compared to the reference sequence (Table 2). The length of the sequenced region was 2038 bp in total.

Table 2 Identified nucleotide substitutions in the porcine Zip4-like coding region and frequencies in sample set one

* Nucleotide substitutions and their numbering referring to GenBank sequence XM_001925360. Position +1 corresponds to the first nucleotide of the ATG translation initiation codon according to the Zip4 protein sequence (XP_001925395.2).

The nucleotide substitutions are spread quite evenly from exon IV to IX and were not identified in a homozygous form in the samples. The frequencies of the substituted alleles compared to the reference sequence varied from 0·01 to 0·74 (Table 2). In this study, six of the nucleotide substitutions were synonymous, whereas a substitution of A with C in exon IX (XM_001925360 c.1430A>C) causes an amino acid exchange from glutamic acid to alanine (p.Glu477Ala). Remarkably, C is the major allele and had by far the highest frequency (0·74) compared to the other identified nucleotide substitutions in our samples, while A was the allele of the used GenBank reference sequence (XM_001925360).

The association analysis revealed a significant influence of the identified non-synonymous nucleotide substitution XM_001925360 c.1430A>C on two of the investigated traits (Table 3). The least square means of Zn concentration in the pancreas and of apparent Zn absorption (week 2) were significantly higher for animals with the AC genotype compared to the CC genotype. R 2 for apparent Zn absorption is 0·48 and for Zn concentration in the pancreas 0·36, respectively, which indicates that a considerable part of the variation is explained by the different genotypes.

Table 3 Influence different genotypes of the Zip4-like nucleotide substitution (XM_001925360, c.1430A>C) on average daily gain (ADG), zinc concentration in plasma, liver and pancreas and apparent zinc absorption in piglets (Least squares mean (lsm) with their standard errors)

P values for significance of genotype, Zn source and their interaction.

The other nucleotide substitutions did not have a significant effect on the analysed traits (Table 3). The results from the bioinformatical analysis with the SIFT Blink procedure for the porcine amino acid sequence XP_001925395.2 implied that the amino acid exchange p.Glu477Ala would not be deleterious for protein function. Nevertheless, the BLOSUM62 matrix revealed a negative score ( − 1) and therefore indicated this amino acid exchange as rather deleterious. Furthermore, the PHD method predicted an alpha helix structure for the amino acid residues at positions 473–475 when glutamic acid is present at position 477, instead of a random coil structure when alanine is present. However, this change is predicted for only three positions within a random coil stretch over approximately sixty positions, and the prediction accuracy is lower than 83 % for positions 473 and 474.

Sequencing exon IX in sample set two showed that three of the five Pi sires of the piglets in sample set one had the heterozygous AC genotype and the other two sires the CC genotype of variant XM_001925360 c.1430A>C. Additionally, we identified two other Pi pigs that were heterozygous AC. All other pigs of sample set two, including the nine wild boars, were homozygous CC. Furthermore, the alignment with exon IX of other species revealed that nucleotide C is found in most species which therefore have the same amino acid (alanine) in this position of the Zip4 peptide chain (Fig. 1). Only the rat showed threonine in this position (GenBank accession no. NM_001101021).

Fig. 1 Alignment of the mRNA and protein sequences for exon IX of the Zip4 transporter in different species (GenBank accession numbers: Sus scrofa 2: XM_001925360; Bos taurus: NM_001046067; Homo sapiens: NM_017767.2; Pongo abelii: XM_002819543; Rattus norwegicus (Rattus norw.): NM_001101021; Mus musculus: NM_028064.2; Canis familiaris (Canis fam.): XM_539217.2). The shaded areas indicate homologue regions. Sus scrofa 1: sequence obtained in this study. The underlined letter indicates the nucleotide substitution in this sequence compared to the reference sequence Sus scrofa 2: XM_001925360. (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn)

Discussion

In the present study, seven nucleotide substitutions were identified in the porcine Zip4-like coding region compared to the porcine GenBank sequence XM_001925360. One of these nucleotide substitutions (c.1430A>C) was non-synonymous and the association analysis revealed a significant influence on apparent Zn absorption in the first metabolism period and on pancreatic Zn concentration. The absence of significant associations of the other identified sequence variants with the analysed traits was not unexpected as an influence of synonymous nucleotide substitutions in coding regions on the gene function is less likely, although not impossible, e. g. when located in binding sites for splicing enzymes.

The database of genetic variation of the National Center of Biotechnology (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp, last accessed on 11 August 2011) did not contain any SNP for the porcine Zip4-like gene. To our knowledge, there has not been any other study investigating the genetic variation in the porcine Zip4 transporter.

The fact that there is a significant difference between the genotypes CC and AC in apparent Zn absorption in the first metabolism period (second week of the trial) but not in the second period (fourth week of the trial) might be caused by the different Zn requirement of the piglets. Even though the Zn concentration in the diet was constantly at 70 mg/kg during the whole feeding trial, the Zn requirements of the piglets decreased from 100 mg/kg during the first metabolism period to 80 mg/kg during the second period(5, 6). Therefore, the relative Zn supply increased from the first to the second metabolism period. From other species it is known that Zip4 expression is up-regulated during Zn deficiency(Reference Weaver, Beattie and Kambe26). Therefore, the transporter-facilitated Zn uptake plays a predominant role in situations of suboptimal Zn supply.

However, when Zn supply is adequate, other uptake mechanisms such as intracellular uptake can influence the Zn absorption(Reference Dibley, Bowman and Russell27). Furthermore, in a situation of excess Zn supply, significant amounts of Zn are excreted via the enterocytes and pancreatic secretions into the intestine that will influence the results of apparent Zn absorption(Reference Pekas28).

Zn has important functions in the synthesis, storage and secretion of insulin and influences its conformational integrity(Reference Chausmer29). Therefore, the maintenance of an appropriate pancreatic Zn concentration in the pancreas is crucial for the organism. Additionally, the pancreas plays an important role in Zn metabolism(Reference McClain30). Significant amounts of Zn are excreted via the secretion of pancreatic juices into the gut and the concentration of Zn in the pancreatic juices is Zn dependent (summarised by Rofe et al. (Reference Rofe, Winters and Hinskens31)). This might explain why there is a genotype-dependent difference in Zn concentration in the pancreas but not in the liver or in the plasma Zn.

The nucleotide substitution XM_001925360 c.1430A>C, which leads to an amino acid substitution (p.Glu477Ala), showed a high frequency in the present sample. In none of the sample sets was there any animal with the homozygous genotype AA of c.1430A>C. In sample set one, eighteen of thirty-five animals had the heterozygote AC genotype. All piglets of this sample set were Pi × DAN-Breed hybrids. In sample set two, only five of forty-six animals were heterozygous for the SNP c.1430A>C. All five animals were purebred Pi pigs, and three of these were sires of the feeding trial piglets. Additionally, all nine genotyped wild boars had the CC genotype. All this led to the assumption that C might be the wild-type allele. Furthermore, the alignment of the porcine exon IX with other species in Fig. 1 shows that alanine is the predominant amino acid in this position across the analysed species. However, other amino acids such as threonine in the rat can also be found at that position.

Even though our sample sets are too small and do not include enough purebred and unrelated animals of each breed for definite conclusions, these results indicate that the A allele of the c.1430A>C substitution is notably more prevalent in Pi than in the other investigated breeds and in wild boars. Animals with the AC genotype showed a significantly better apparent Zn absorption in the first metabolism period compared with the animals of the CC genotype. From human studies it is known that, in situations with suboptimal Zn supply, the amount of Zn supply is closely related to growth rate in children(Reference Gibson, Hess and Hotz32). As pigs of the Pi breed have been selected intensively for a high growth rate, they might have been selected indirectly for improved Zn absorption. In several studies on quantitative trait loci for average daily growth rates and body weight at slaughter in modern European and Asian pig breeds as well as in wild-type pigs(Reference Nagamine, Haley and Sewalem33Reference Edwards, Ernst and Raney35), quantitative trait loci have been found in regions on the porcine chromosome 4 where the Zip4-like gene is located.

As the exact mechanism of Zn transport by the Zip4-transporter proteins in not known, it is not yet possible to determine whether the amino acid exchange (p.Glu477Ala) directly influences the biological function of the transporter. Alanine and glutamic acid are both strong alpha-helix creators(Reference Christen and Jaussi36), so their exchange may not have a strong effect on the secondary structure of the protein. Additionally, the results of the bioinformatical analysis with the SIFT Blink procedure, the BLOSUM62 matrix and the PHD method did not indicate a strong effect of the amino acid substitution p.Glu477Ala on protein structure and function. However, alanine has a neutral hydrophobic side chain while the side chain of glutamic acid is negatively charged, which might make a difference in the transport abilities of Zip4.

In humans, there are more than thirty different variants known to cause acrodermatitis enteropathica. They are spread evenly over the whole gene and include any type of mutation such as nonsense and missense mutations, deletions of different sizes, insertions with frameshifts and splice-site changes (reviewed by Schmitt et al. (Reference Schmitt, Kury and Giraud19)). They often appear in highly conserved regions of the gene, such as the transmembrane domains. However, these mutations lead to severely reduced Zn absorption, which causes clinical Zn deficiency symptoms that may be lethal if untreated. The p.Glu477Ala amino acid substitution lies in an area between the histidine-rich region and the fourth transmembrane domain (Fig. 2). This region might be less crucial for protein function than the transmembrane domains.

Fig. 2 Sequence alignment of the complete porcine and human Zip4 proteins (reference sequences: Sus scrofa: XP_001925395.2; Homo sapiens: NP_060237). The shaded amino acids are conserved between human and pig Zip4. The eight transmembrane domains (TMD) are indicated by a solid line above the sequences(Reference Dufner-Beattie, Wang and Kuo18). The histidine-rich region is indicated by italics, and the position of the nucleotide substitution p.Glu477Ala with a bold letter.

Even though it is not clear whether the amino acid substitution itself is responsible for the difference in apparent Zn absorption and pancreatic Zn concentration or if it is linked to another causal sequence variant, the polymorphism could be used as a marker to genotype experimental animals with regard to their Zn absorption abilities. This can be a powerful tool to reduce the inter-individual variance in experiments dealing with Zn absorption.

Furthermore, the approach of investigating the genetic aspect of Zn absorption efficiency offers interesting new possibilities in the field of animal breeding and nutrition. So far, research on Zn bioavailability has only investigated different dietary Zn sources. Our results show that in the conflict between providing an adequate Zn supply to the animal on the one hand and environmental issues on the other hand, it might be worthwhile considering the genetic compounds that influence Zn absorption. The estimated frequency of 0·26 for the A-allele in the crossbred animals of sample set one would be high enough to be considered in breeding programmes after associations with economic parameters are evaluated.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all involved persons for their participation in the present study. The contributions of the authors to the study were as follows: J. P. and F. S. conducted the feeding trial. G. E. initiated and participated with G. L. and F. S. in the genetic studies and manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the manuscript. For none of the authors are there conflicts of interest. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.

References

1Andreini, C, Banci, L, Bertini, I, et al. (2006) Counting the zinc-proteins encoded in the human genome. J Proteome Res 5, 196201.Google Scholar
2Cousins, RJ (1996) Zinc. In Present Knowledge in Nutrition, 7th ed., pp. 293306 [Ziegler, EE and Filer, LJ, editors]. Washington, DC: ILSI Press International Life Sciences Institute.Google Scholar
3McDowell, LR (2003) Minerals in Animal and Human Nutrition, 2nd ed.Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
4Jondreville, C, Revy, PS & Dourmad, JY (2003) Dietary means to better control the environmental impact of copper and zinc by pigs from weaning to slaughter. Livest Prod Sci 84, 147156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5National Research Council (1998) Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 10th ed.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
6Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie (2008) Recommendations for the Supply of Energy and Nutrients to Pigs. Frankfurt/Main: DLG-Verlag.Google Scholar
7Hill, DA, Peo, ERJ & Lewis, AJ (1987) Influence of picolinic acid on the uptake of 65 zinc-amino acid complexes by the everted rat gut. J Anim Sci 65, 173178.Google Scholar
8Wedekind, KJ, Lewis, AJ, Giesemann, MA, et al. (1994) Bioavailability of zinc from inorganic and organic sources for pigs fed corn-soybean meal diets. J Anim Sci 72, 26812689.Google Scholar
9Schell, TC & Kornegay, ET (1996) Zinc concentration in tissues and performance of weanling pigs fed pharmacological levels of zinc from ZnO, Zn-methionine, Zn-lysine, or ZnSO4. J Anim Sci 74, 15841593.Google Scholar
10Case, CL & Carlson, MS (2002) Effect of feeding organic and inorganic sources of additional zinc on growth performance and zinc balance in nursery pigs. J Anim Sci 80, 19171924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Revy, PS, Jondreville, C, Dourmad, JY, et al. (2002) Bioavailability of two sources of zinc in weanling pigs. Anim Res 51, 315326.Google Scholar
12Carlson, MS, Boren, CA, Wu, C, et al. (2004) Evaluation of various inclusion rates of organic zinc either as polysaccharide or proteinate complex on the growth performance, plasma, and excretion of nursery pigs. J Anim Sci 82, 13591366.Google Scholar
13Buff, CE, Bollinger, DW, Ellersieck, MR, et al. (2005) Comparison of growth performance and zinc absorption, retention, and excretion in weanling pigs fed diets supplemented with zinc-polysaccharide or zinc oxide. J Anim Sci 83, 23802386.Google Scholar
14Hollis, GR, Carter, SD, Cline, TR, et al. (2005) Effects of replacing pharmacological levels of dietary zinc oxide with lower dietary levels of various organic zinc sources for weanling pigs. J Anim Sci 83, 21232129.Google Scholar
15Lichten, LA & Cousins, RJ (2009) Mammalian zinc transporters: nutritional and physiologic regulation. Annu Rev Nutr 29, 153176.Google Scholar
16Kury, S, Dreno, B, Bezieau, S, et al. (2002) Identification of SLC39A4, a gene involved in acrodermatitis enteropathica. Nat Genet 31, 239240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Wang, K, Zhou, B, Kuo, YM, et al. (2002) A novel member of a zinc transporter family is defective in acrodermatitis enteropathica. Am J Hum Genet 71, 6673.Google Scholar
18Dufner-Beattie, J, Wang, FD, Kuo, YM, et al. (2003) The acrodermatitis enteropathica gene ZIP4 encodes a tissue-specific, zinc-regulated zinc transporter in mice. Biol Chem 278, 3347433481.Google Scholar
19Schmitt, S, Kury, S, Giraud, M, et al. (2009) An update on mutations of the SLC39A4 gene in acrodermatitis enteropathica. Human Mutat 30, 926933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan, V & Bartlett, E (2006) Identification of a unique splice site variant in SLC39A4 in bovine hereditary zinc deficiency, lethal trait A46: an animal model of acrodermatitis enteropathica. Genomics 88, 521526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Krametter-Froetscher, R, Hauser, S & Baumgartner, W (2005) Zinc-responsive dermatosis in goats suggestive of hereditary malabsorption: two field cases. Vet Dermatol 16, 269275.Google Scholar
22Chomczynski, P & Sacchi, N (1987) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinum thiocyanate phenol chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162, 156159.Google Scholar
23Kumar, P, Henikoff, S & Ng, PC (2009) Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 4, 10731082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Henikoff, S & Henikoff, JG (1992) Amino-acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89, 1091510919.Google Scholar
25Rost, B & Sander, C (1993) Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70 % accuracy. J Mol Biol 232, 584599.Google Scholar
26Weaver, BP, Beattie, JD, Kambe, T, et al. (2007) Novel zinc-responsive post-transcriptional mechanisms reciprocally regulate expression of the mouse Slc39a4 and Slc39a5 zinc transporters (Zip4 and Zp5). Biol Chem 388, 13011312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Dibley, MJ (2001) Zinc. In Present Knowledge in Nutrition, 8th ed., pp. 329–343 [Bowman, BA and Russell, RM, editors]. Washington, DC: ILSI Press International Life Sciences Institute.Google Scholar
28Pekas, JC (1966) Zinc 65 metabolism – gastrointestinal secretion by pig. Am J Physiol 211, 407413.Google Scholar
29Chausmer, AB (1998) Zinc, insulin and diabetes. J Am Coll Nutr 17, 109115.Google Scholar
30McClain, CJ (1990) The pancreas and zinc homeostasis. J Lab Clin Med 116, 275276.Google Scholar
31Rofe, AM, Winters, N, Hinskens, B, et al. (1999) The role of the pancreas in intestinal zinc secretion in metallothionein-null mice. Pancreas 19, 6975.Google Scholar
32Gibson, RS, Hess, SY, Hotz, C, et al. (2008) Indicators of zinc status at the population level: a review of the evidence. Br J Nutr 99, S14S23.Google Scholar
33Nagamine, Y, Haley, CS, Sewalem, A, et al. (2003) Quantitative trait loci variation for growth and obesity between and within lines of pigs (Sus scrofa). Genetics 164, 629635.Google Scholar
34Liu, G, Kim, J, Jonas, E, et al. (2008) Combined line-cross and half-sib QTL analysis in Duroc–Pietrain population. Mamm Genome 19, 429438.Google Scholar
35Edwards, DB, Ernst, CW, Raney, NE, et al. (2008) Quantitative trait locus mapping in an F2 Duroc × Pietrain resource population: II. Carcass and meat quality traits. J Anim Sci 86, 254266.Google Scholar
36Christen, P & Jaussi, R (2005) Biochemie. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Details of PCR amplification and sequencing of Zip4-like gene fragments

Figure 1

Table 2 Identified nucleotide substitutions in the porcine Zip4-like coding region and frequencies in sample set one

Figure 2

Table 3 Influence different genotypes of the Zip4-like nucleotide substitution (XM_001925360, c.1430A>C) on average daily gain (ADG), zinc concentration in plasma, liver and pancreas and apparent zinc absorption in piglets (Least squares mean (lsm) with their standard errors)

Figure 3

Fig. 1 Alignment of the mRNA and protein sequences for exon IX of the Zip4 transporter in different species (GenBank accession numbers: Sus scrofa 2: XM_001925360; Bos taurus: NM_001046067; Homo sapiens: NM_017767.2; Pongo abelii: XM_002819543; Rattus norwegicus (Rattus norw.): NM_001101021; Mus musculus: NM_028064.2; Canis familiaris (Canis fam.): XM_539217.2). The shaded areas indicate homologue regions. Sus scrofa 1: sequence obtained in this study. The underlined letter indicates the nucleotide substitution in this sequence compared to the reference sequence Sus scrofa 2: XM_001925360. (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn)

Figure 4

Fig. 2 Sequence alignment of the complete porcine and human Zip4 proteins (reference sequences: Sus scrofa: XP_001925395.2; Homo sapiens: NP_060237). The shaded amino acids are conserved between human and pig Zip4. The eight transmembrane domains (TMD) are indicated by a solid line above the sequences(18). The histidine-rich region is indicated by italics, and the position of the nucleotide substitution p.Glu477Ala with a bold letter.