Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:47:58.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Letters to the Editors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

W. C. Willett ,
S. A. Bingham ,
M. Plummer  and
N. E. Day
W. C. Willett
Affiliation:
Department of NutritionHarvard School of Public Health665 Huntingdon Avenue Boston, MA USA
S. A. Bingham
Affiliation:
Dunn Clinical Nutrition CentreHills Road CambridgeCB2 2DH
M. Plummer
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Health University of CambridgeRobinson WayCambridge CB2 2SR
N. E. Day
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Health University of CambridgeRobinson WayCambridge CB2 2SR
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editors
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , July 1995 , pp. 141 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1995

References

Bingham, S. A., Gill, C., Welch, A., Day, K., Cassidy, A., Khaw, K. T., Sneyd, M. J., Key, T. J. A., Roe, L. & Day, N. E. (1994). Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records. British Journal of Nutrition 72, 619–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed