Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:56:18.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Iron absorption from a malted cocoa drink fortified with ferric orthophosphate using the stable isotope 58Fe as an extrinsic label

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Susan J. Fairweather-Tait ,
Margaret J. Minski  and
D. P. Richardson
Susan J. Fairweather-Tait
Affiliation:
ARC Food Research Institute, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UA
Margaret J. Minski
Affiliation:
The Reactor Centre, Imperial College, Silwood Park, Sunninghill, Ascot, Berks SL5 7PY
D. P. Richardson
Affiliation:
The Lord Zuckerman Research Centre, Cadbury Schweppes Group Research, The University, Whiteknights, Reading, Berks RG6 2LA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The potential use of an extrinsic label to measure iron absorption from a ferric orthophosphate-fortified malted cocoa drink was examined by measuring the solubility of the FePO4 in 0·1 M-hydrochloric acid.

2. The validity of using the stable isotope 58Fe as an extrinsic label was tested by comparing Fe absorption by rats from wheat flour extrinsically-labelled with 58Fe or 59Fe.

3. Fe absorption from a malted cocoa drink (20 g powder made up with hot water) fortified with FePO4 (0·5 mg Fe/g powder) was measured in human subjects using 58Fe as an extrinsic label. Absorption was calculated by measuring unabsorbed 58Fe in faeces. Absorptions of Fe from the drink fortified with either FePO4 or ferrous sulphate were compared. The effect of the addition of ascorbic acid to the drink (1 mg/g powder) on Fe availability was also examined.

4. The effect of fasting on Fe absorption from the drink was determined in rats by giving the drink to fasting animals or shortly after they had consumed a small meal.

5. The FePO4 was totally soluble in 0·1 M-HCl and there were no differences in absorption between 58Fe- and 59Fe-labelled wheat flour. In the human experiment the proportion of Fe absorbed from the drink plus FePO4 and ascorbic acid was (mean with SE) 0·25 (0·02), from the drink plus FePO4 0·24 (0·02) and from the drink plus FeSO4 0·23 (0·03). Fasting had a significant effect on Fe availability; rats given the drink shortly after a small meal absorbed less than half as much Fe as those given the drink on a fasted stomach.

6. It was concluded that the FePO4 used to fortify the malted cocoa drink was as well absorbed as FeSO4 but that the high levels of absorption were a reflection of the fasting condition of the subjects. The level of ascorbic acid was not great enough to enhance the availability of the FePO4 any further.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , July 1983 , pp. 51 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

REFERENCES

Brise, H. (1962). Acta Medica Scandinavica Supplement 376 59, 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brise, H. & Hallberg, L. (1962). Acta Medica Scandinavica, Supplement 376 59, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S. & Booth, G. H. (1975). New England Journal of Medicine 30th Oct., 897–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, J. C., Pla, G. W., Harrison, B. N. & Clark, G. A. (1974). Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 57, 513–516.Google Scholar
Fritz, J. C., Pla, G. W., Harrison, B. N. & Clark, G. A. (1975). Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 58, 902–905.Google Scholar
Harrison, B. N., Pla, G. W., Clark, G. A.& Fritz, J. C. (1976). Cereal Chemistry 53, 78–84.Google Scholar
Horwitz, W. (editor) (1975). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, p. 829. Washington DC: Association Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Jacobs, P., Bothwell, T. & Charlton, R. W. (1964). Journal of Applied Physiology 19, 187–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janghorbani, M., Ting, B. T. G. & Young, V. R. (1980). Journal of Nutrition 110, 2190–2197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcoff, J. & Favour, C. B. (1944). American Journal of Physiology 141, 695–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsen, E. R. (1974). Journal of Nutrition 104, 1490–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, A. A. & Southgate, D. A. T. (1978). McCance & Widdowson's ‘The Composition of Foods’, MRC Special Report no. 297. London: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Pla, G. W., Harrison, B. N. & Fritz, J. C. (1973). Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 56, 1369–1373.Google Scholar
Rees, J. M.& Monsen, E. R. (1973). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 21, 913–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Report of the Working Group on Fortification of Salt with Iron (1982). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 35, 1442–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayers, M. H., Lynch, S. R., Charlton, R. W., Bothwell, T. H., Walker, R. B.& Mayet, F. (1974 a). British Journal of Haematology 28, 483–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayers, M. H., Lynch, S. R., Charlton, R. W., Bothwell, T. H., Walder, R. B. & Mayet, F. (1974 b). British Journal of Nutrition 31, 367–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snednecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1973). Statistical Methods, 6th ed., p. 100. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar