Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:56:43.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Iron absorption from a cereal-based meal containing cane sugar fortified with ascorbic acid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

D. Derman
Affiliation:
South African MRC Iron and Red Cell Metabolism Unit, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
M. Sayers
Affiliation:
South African MRC Iron and Red Cell Metabolism Unit, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
S. R. Lynch
Affiliation:
South African MRC Iron and Red Cell Metabolism Unit, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
R. W. Charlton
Affiliation:
South African MRC Iron and Red Cell Metabolism Unit, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
T. H. Bothwell
Affiliation:
South African MRC Iron and Red Cell Metabolism Unit, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Fatima Mayet
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Natal, Durban, South Africa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The feasibility of improving iron nutrition by fortifying cane sugar with ascorbic acid was studied.

2. The absorption of Fe added to maize-weal porridge was measured in 116 volunteer multiparous Indian women using the radio-Fe erythrocyte utilization method. The meals were fed with and without tea or coffee and with and without varying amounts of ascorbic acid.

3. The mean absorption of Fe from maize-meal porridge was very low (3.8 %), being even further reduced (2.1 %) when tea was drunk with the meal.

4. The addition of 50 or 100 mg ascorbic acid to maize-meal porridge caused approximately a 10-fold increase in Fe absorption. The increase was much less when tea was present, being 2-fold and 5-fold with 50 and 100 mg ascorbic acid respectively. The inhibitory effect of tea on Fe absorption could, however, be overcome by giving larger doses of ascorbic acid (250 and 500 mg).

5. When contaminating Fe (2.5 mg) in the form of labelled rust (Fe2O3) or ferric hydroxide was added to maize-meal porridge it was poorly absorbed (mean values were 0.01 % and 1.5 % respectively). The addition of 100 mg ascorbic acid increased the mean Fe absorption rates to 0.5 % and 6.7 % with Fe2O3 and Fe(OH)3 respectively. Fe(OH)3 was found to be absorbed about half as well as the intrinsic Fe present in maize-meal porridge.

6. It is concluded that ascorbic acid is capable of improving Fe absorption from a cereal source. It can partially overcome the inhibitory effect of tea and might be expected to facilitate the absorption of at least some forms of Fe that may contaminate food.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1977

References

REFERENCES

Apte, S. V. & Iyengar, L. (1970). Am. J. din. Nutr. 23, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björn-Rasmussen, E., Hallberg, L. & Walker, R. B. (1972). Am. J. din. Nutr. 25, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bothwell, T. H. & Finch, C. A. (1962). Iron Metabolism, 1st ed., pp. 18, 26. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Bothwell, T. H. & Mallett, B. (1955). Biochem. J. 59, 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, D. G. & Campbell, J. A. (1957). Br. J. Nutr. 11, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee on Iron Deficiency (1968). J. Am. med. Ass. 203, 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, J. D., Layrisse, M., Martine-Torres, C., Walker, R., Monsen, E. & Finch, C. A. (1972). J. clin. Invest. 51, 805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disler, P. B., Lynch, S. R., Charlton, R. W., Bothwell, T. H., Walker, R. B. & Mayet, F. (1975). Br. J. Nutr. 34, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disler, P. B., Lynch, S. R., Charlton, R. W., Torrance, J. D., Bothwell, T. H., Walker, R. B. & Mayet, F. (1974). Gut 16, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elwood, P. C. (1968). Rep. Publ. Hlth med. Supj., Lond. no. 117.Google Scholar
Hegsted, D. M., Finch, C. A. & Kinney, T. D. (1949). J. Exp. Med. 90, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, V., Gottlieb, C. W., Lau, K. S., Gevirtz, N. R., Sharney, L. & Wasserman, L. R. (1967). J. nucl. Med. 8, 529.Google Scholar
International Commission for Radiation Protection (1960). Report of Committee II on Permissible Dose of Internal Radiation 1959. I.C.R.P. Publication no. 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A., Miller, F., Worwood, M., Beamish, M. R. & Wardrop, C. A. (1972). Br. med. J. 4, 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. H., Zoukis, M., Hart, W. L. & Dern, R. J. (1964). J. Lab. clin. Med. 63, 885.Google Scholar
Kuhn, I. N., Monsen, E. R., Cook, J. D. & Finch, C. A. (1968). J. Lab. din. Med. 71, 715.Google Scholar
Lorber, L. (1927). Biochem. Z. 181, 391.Google Scholar
Martinez-Torres, C. & Layrisse, M. (1973). Clin. Haemat. 2, 339.Google Scholar
Mayet, F. G. H., Adams, E. B., Moodley, T., Kleber, E. E. & Cooper, S. K. (1972). S. Afr. med. J. 46,1427.Google Scholar
Miles, L. E. M., Lipschitz, D. A., Bieber, C. P. & Cook, J. P. (1974). Analyt. Biochem. 61, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, T., Apt., L. & Ross, J. F. (1971). Gastroenterology 61, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramalingaswami, R. & Patwardhan, V. N. (1949). Indian J. med. Res. 37, 51.Google Scholar
Sayers, M. H., Lynch, S. R., Charlton, R. W., Bothwell, T. H., Walker, R. B. & Mayet, F. (1974 a). Br. J. Nutr. 31, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayers, M. H., Lynch, S. R., Charlton, R. W., Bothwell, T. H., Walker, R. B. & Mayet, F. (1974 b). Br. J. Haemat. 28, 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayers, M. H., Lynch, S. R., Jacobs, P., Charlton, R. W., Bothwell, T. H., Walker, R. B. & Mayet, F. (1973). Br. J. Haemat. 24, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soni, B. L. & Sharma, D. C. (1974). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 27, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, A. I. (1960). Quantitative Inorganic Analysis, 2nd ed., p. 407. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Whittemore, D. O. & Langmuir, D. (1975). Ground Water 13, 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar