Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:28:35.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation of nitrogen balance in dairy cows and steers nourished by intragastric infusion

Effects of submaintenance energy input with or without protein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

E. R. Ørskov
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
N. A. MacLeod
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
S. T. M. Fahmy
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
L. Istasse
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
F. D. DeB. Hovell
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Two dairy cows were maintained by intragastric infusion of volatile fatty acids and casein. Except when fasting, the casein-nitrogen was held constant, while total gross energy supply was varied from zero during fasting to 650 kJ/kg body-weight (W)0·75.

2. One cow was estimated to attain zero N balance at an energy intake of 255 kJ/kg W0·75 and the other at 307 kJ/kg W0·75, which was calculated to be substantially below the estimated energy required for zero energy balance.

3. When the cows were later given an N-free infusion for a period preceding the trial, N balance occurred at 98 kJ/kg W0·75 for one cow and 115 kJ/kg W0·75 for the other.

4. Four steers were similarly nourished by intragastric infusion and the energy nutrient increased from 0 at fasting to 450 kJ/kg W0·75. The protein was held constant at 1 g N/kg W0·75 except at fasting. The energy level at which N balance occurred was 154 (SE 38) kJ/kg W0·75 or approximately equal to the energy content of the protein. The practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). In The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Andrews, R. & Ørskov, E. R. (1970). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 1926.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1962). British Journal of Nutrition 16, 615626.Google Scholar
Burton, J. H., Anderson, M. & Reid, J. T. (1974). British Journal of Nutrition 32, 515527.Google Scholar
Calloway, D. H. & Spector, H. (1954). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2, 405412.Google Scholar
Close, W. H., Mount, L. E. & Brown, D. (1978). British Journal of Nutrition 40, 423431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, I., Mathieson, J. & Boyne, A. W. (1970). Analyst, London 95, 181193.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. F. & Croft, M. (1977). British Journal of Nutrition 38, 479488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graystone, J. E. (1968). In Human Growth [Cheek, D. B., editor]. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Hawk, P. B., Oser, B. L. & Summerson, W. H. (editors) (1947). Practical Physiological Chemistry, 12th ed., p. 506. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Hovell, F. D. DeB., MacLeod, N. A., Stirton, R. A. & Ørskov, E. R. (1982). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 41, 27A.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, P. E. (editor) (1958). In Dyrefysiologi: Den Kgl Veterinaer og Landbohojskole, p. 267. Copenhagen: De Studerendes Raad.Google Scholar
Keenan, D. M., McManus, W. R. & Freer, M. (1969). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 139147.Google Scholar
MacLeod, N. A., Corrigall, W., Stirton, R. A. & Ørskov, E. R. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 47, 547552.Google Scholar
Marsh, W. H., Fingerhut, B. & Miller, H. (1965). Clinical Chemistry 11, 624627.Google Scholar
Morris, S. & Roy, S. C. (1939). Biochemical Journal 33 (ii), 12171230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & Fraser, C. (1973). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 32, 68A.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & Grubb, D. A. (1979). Animal Production 29, 371377.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Grubb, D. A., Smith, J. S., Webster, A. J. F. & Corrigall, W. (1979 a). British Journal of Nutrition 41, 541551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Grubb, D. A., Wenham, G. & Corrigall, W. (1979 b). British Journal of Nutrition 41, 553558.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & MacLeod, N. A. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 47, 625636.Google Scholar
Palmer, W. W., Means, J. H. & Gamble, J. L. (1914). Journal of Biological Chemistry 19, 239244.Google Scholar
Storm, E. & Ørskov, E. R. (1982). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 41, 78A.Google Scholar
Technicon Instrument Co. Ltd. (1965). Technicon Methodology Sheet NIIA, Basingstoke: Technicon Instrument Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Technicon Instrument Co. Ltd. (1967). Technicon Methodology Sheet NIC. Basingstoke: Technicon Instrument Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. (1980). In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 469484 [Ruckebusch, Y. and Thivend, P., editors]. Lancaster: MTP Press Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar