Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:50:26.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The intake and excretion of calorific constituents of milk by babies*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

D. A. T. Southgate  and
Irene M. Barrett
D. A. T. Southgate
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Cambridge
Irene M. Barrett
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The intake and excretion of energy, total nitrogen, fat and carbohydrate by twenty baby boys aged about a fortnight were measured over 3 days. 2. Ten of the babies received breast milk which had been expressed from their mothers, the remaining ten received one of two preparations based on dried cow's milk, with either lactose or sucrose added. 3. The intake of energy, protein and carbohydrate was greater in the ten babies receiving the cow's milk preparations. 4. The urinary excretion and retention of N was greater in the babies fed on the cow's milk preparations. 5. The absolute excretion of N in the faeces was simiIar whatever the diet, but the excretion of fat was less and the excretion of carbohydrate greater for babies having breast milk. 6. The calorie:N ratio in the urine was 5.8 kcal/g urinary N in those receiving breast milk and 4.8 kcal/g N in those fed on the cow's milk preparations. The value for the adult is 7.9. 7. Calorie conversion factors have been calculated which are more appropriate for milk diets for babies than the factors of Atwater which were designed for mixed diets for adults.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , May 1966 , pp. 363 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1966

References

REFERENCES

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1950). Official Methods of Analysis, 7th ed., p. 503. Washington, DC: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Atwater, W. O. (1900). 12th Rep. Storrs agric. Exp. Stn.Google Scholar
Atwater, W. O. (1903). 15th Rep. Storrs agric. Exp. Stn.Google Scholar
Barbero, G. J., Runge, G., Fischer, D., Crawford, M. N., Torres, F. E. & György, P. (1952). J. Pediat. 40, 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, S. R. & Franke, E. (1922). J. biol. Chem. 52, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Graham, N. McC. (1955). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 14, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. H. (1959). Analyt. Chem. 31, 1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chibnall, A. C., Rees, M. W. & Williams, E. F. (1943). Biochem. J. 37, 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehnert, J. (1960). Z. Kinderheilk. 83, 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delcourt, R. (1959). Revue belge Path. Méd. exp. 27, 50.Google Scholar
Feldheim, G. (1958). Ernährungsforschung, 8, 193.Google Scholar
Gunther, M. & Stanier, J. E. (1951). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 275, p. 379,Google Scholar
Hawk, P. B., Oser, B. L. & Summerson, W. H. (1954). Practical Physiological Chemistry, 13th ed. London: J. and A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Holt, L. E. Jr., Tidwell, H. C., Kirk, C. M., Cross, D. M. & Neale, S. (1935). J. Pediat. 6, 427.Google Scholar
Holzel, A. (1964). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 23, 123.Google Scholar
Keys, A. (1945). J. Nutr. 29, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, L. A. (1944). J. Nutr. 28, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, R. A. & Widdowson, E. M. (1947). J. Hyg., Camb., 45, 59.Google Scholar
McCance, R. A. & Widdowson, E. M. (1957). Lancet, ii, 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, A. L. & Watt, B. K. (1955). Agric. Handbook, US. Dep. Agric. no. 74.Google Scholar
Morey, N. B. (1936–1937). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 6, 1.Google Scholar
Ocklitz, H. W. & Reinmuth, B. (1959). Z. Kinderheilk. 82, 321.Google Scholar
Partridge, S. M. (1949). Nature, Lond., 164, 443.Google Scholar
Rubner, M. & Heubner, O. (1898). Z. Biol. 36, 1.Google Scholar
Schreier, K. (1958). Z. Kinderheilk, 81, 442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, J. E. (1961). Br. J. Nutr. 15, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somogyi, M. (1945). J. biol. Chem. 160, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Lieberman, L. & Szekely, S. (1898). Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 72, 336.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. (1955). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 14, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. (1961). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 297, p. 153.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. (1965). Lancet, ii, 1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. & Spray, C. M. (1951). Archs. Dis. Childh. 26, 205.Google Scholar