Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:43:40.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of proanthocyanidin-rich bean hulls and level of dietary protein on energy metabolizability and nutrient digestibility by adult cockerels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. A. Longstaff ,
D. Feuerstein ,
J. M. McNab  and
C. McCorquodale
M. A. Longstaff
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh EH14 4AS
D. Feuerstein
Affiliation:
Institute KTZ-470, Garbenstrasse, 17, 7000 Stuttgart 70, West Germany
J. M. McNab
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
C. McCorquodale
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Cotyledons and hulls were prepared from twelve varieties of field beans (Vicia faba L.). Adult cockerels were tube-fed either beans, cotyledons or hull diets containing high or low levels of protein. Metabolizable energy coefficients and starch digestibility coefficients were determined for beans, cotyledons and hull diets. Lipid digestibility coefficients from hull diets were also determined. When cotyledons were fed there were no significant differences in the way in which adult cockerels metabolized energy or digested starch from the proanthocyanidin-free and proanthocyanidin-rich varieties (0·780, 0·908, 0·775 and 0·918 respectively). When beans were fed, however, both energy metabolizability and starch digestibility decreased due to the presence of hulls, with proanthocyanidin-rich hulls decreasing values the most to 0·660 and 0·819 respectively, and proanthocyanidin-free hulls decreasing values to a lesser extent to 0·709 and 0·886 respectively. Diets composed of proanthocyanidin-rich hulls depressed metabolizable energy and maize starch digestibility. Their effect on maize starch digestibility, however, was considerably less than that on bean starch. Lipid digestibility was enhanced by proanthocyanidins but only when the protein content of the diet was high. There was a significant correlation (P < 0·05) between the vanillin and anthocyanidin formation methods for the estimation of proanthocyanidins (r 0·779). There was also a highly significant regression of bean starch digestibility v. proanthocyanidin content of coloured-flowered bean hulls (P < 0·001). The regression of maize starch digestibility v. hull proanthocyanidins was also significant at P < 0·005.

Keywords

ProanthocyanidinsEnergy metabolismStarch digestionFat digestionCockerel
Type
Nutritional Effects of Biologically Active Components of Plants
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , July 1993 , pp. 355 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1993

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, A. C. (1985). Plots, Transformations and Regression. Oxford: Oxford Science Publications.Google Scholar
Butler, L. G., Price, M. L. & Brotherton, J. E. (1982). Vanillin assay for proanthocyanidins (condensed tannins): Modification of the solvent for estimation of the degree of polymerisation. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 30, 1087–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carre, B., Escartin, R., Melcion, J. P., Champ, M., Roux, G. & Leclercq, B. (1987). Effect of pelleting and associations with maize or wheat on the nutritive value of smooth pea (Pisum sarivutn) seeds in adult cockerels. British Poultry Science 28, 219–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conan, L. & Carre, B. (1989). Effect of autoclaving on metabolisable energy value of smooth pea seed (Pisutn sativum) in growing chicks. Animal Feed Science and Technology 26, 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Communities (1971). Determination of Crude Oils and Fats. Process A, Part 18, Animal Feedingstuffs, pp. 15–19. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Fleming, S. E. & Vose, J. R. (1979). Digestibility of raw and cooked starches from legume seeds using the laboratory rat. Journal of Nutrition 109, 2067–2075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, D. W. & Moseley, G. (1980). The effect of diets containing field beans of high and low polyphenolic content on the activity of digestive enzymes in the intestine of rats. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 225–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guillaume, P. J. (1978). Digestibilite des proteines, de l'amidon et des lipides de deux types de feverole (Vicia faba L.) crude en autoclave chez poussin. (Digestibility of protein, starch and lipid from two types of bean (Viciafaba L.) raw or autoclaved by young chicks). Archive für Geflugelkunde 42, 179–182.Google Scholar
Horigome, T., Kumar, R. & Okamoto, K. (1988). Effects of condensed tannins prepared from leaves of fodder plants on digestive enzymes in vitro and in the intestine of rats. British Journal of Nutrition 60, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson, G. & John, M. V. (1976). The automated determination of carbohydrate. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 27, 681–687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lever, M. (1972). A new reaction for colorimetric determination of carbohydrates. Analytical Biochemistry 47, 273–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindgren, E. (1975). The nutritive value of peas and beans for hens. Swedish Journal of Agricultura1 Research 5, 159–161.Google Scholar
Longstaff, M. & McNab, J. M. (1986). Influence of site and variety on starch, hemicellulose and cellulose composition of wheats and their digestibilities by adult cockerels. British Poultry Science 27, 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longstaff, M. & McNab, J. M. (1987). Digestion of starch and fibre carbohydrates in peas by adult cockerels. British Poultry Science 28, 261–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longstaff, M. & McNab, J. M. (1991 a). The inhibitory effects of hull polysaccharides and tannins of field beans (Vicia faba L.) on the digestion of amino acids, starch and lipid on digestive enzyme activities in young chicks. British Journal of Nutrition 65, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longstaff, M. & McNab, J. M. (1991 b). The effect of concentration of tannin-rich field bean hulls (Vicia faba L.) on activities of lipase and α-amylase in digesta and pancreas and on the digestion of lipid and starch by young chicks. British Journal of Nutrition 66, 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNab, J. M. & Blair, J. C. (1988). Modified assay for true and apparent metabolisable energy based on tube feeding. British Poultry Science 29, 697–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marquardt, R. R., Ward, A. T., Campbell, L. D. & Cransfield, P. E. (1977). Purification, identification and characterisation of a growth inhibitor in faba beans (Vicia faba L. var. minor). Journal of Nutrition 107, 1313–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitsan, Z. (1971). Vicia faba beans vs. soybean meal as a source of protein. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 22, 252–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, H. I., Hoff, J. E., Armstrong, G. S. & Hoff, L. A. (1980). Hydrophobic interaction in tannin-protein complexes. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 28, 394–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, L. J., Hrstich, L. N. & Chan, B. G. (1986). The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin. Phytochemistry 25, 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneeman, B. O. (1978). Effect of plant fiber on lipase, trypsin and chymotrypsin activity. Journal of Food Science 43, 634–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods, 6th ed., pp. 364–368. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Stanogias, G. & Pearce, G. R. (1985). The digestion of fibre by pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 53, 513–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tawflick, A. M. & Mardon, C. J. (1985). Automated analytical method for the determination of individual sugars in mixtures of glucose, fructose and sucrose. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 36, 621–627.Google Scholar
Yapar, Z. & Clandinin, D. R. (1972). Effect of tannins in rapeseed meal on its nutritional value for chicks. Poultry Science 51, 222–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuste, P., Longstaff, M. & McCorquodale, C. (1992). The effect of proanthocyanidin-rich hulls and proanthocyanidin extracts from bean (Vicia faba L.) hulls on nutrient digestibility and digestive enzyme activities in young chicks. British Journal of Nutrition 61, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuste, P., Longstaff, M. A., McNab, J. M. & McCorquodale, C. (1991). The digestibilities of semi purified starches from wheat, cassava, pea, bean and potato by adult cockerels and young chicks. Animal Feed Science and Technology 35, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar