Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:04:22.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of level of grain intake on protein digestion in the intestine of cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2007

T. S. Neudoerffer ,
P. A. Leadbeater ,
F. D Horney  and
H. S Bayley
T. S. Neudoerffer
Affiliation:
Departments of Nutrition and Clinical Studies, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
P. A. Leadbeater
Affiliation:
Departments of Nutrition and Clinical Studies, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
F. D Horney
Affiliation:
Departments of Nutrition and Clinical Studies, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
H. S Bayley
Affiliation:
Departments of Nutrition and Clinical Studies, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Protein digestion in the gastro-intestinal tract of cattle receiving diets with either low or high content of maize was investigated. Digesta obtained from the duodenum and ileum were separated into three fractions; soluble, microbial and particulate, and the amino acid composition of the three fractions and that of the total digesta were determined. The proportion of particulate material digested in the intestine was less from the high-maize than from the low-maize diet, but more of the particulate fraction entered the duodenum from the high-maize than from the low-maize diet, so the absolute amount of particulate fraction which was digested was greater for the high-maize diet.

2. More protein was digested in the rumen from the low-maize diet (high-roughage) than from the other diet. Total digestion of protein from the low-maize diet was also higher.

3. Although more protein from the high-maize than from the low-maize diet reached the duodenum, the protein from the low-maize diet was more digestible in the intestine, so the total amount of dietary protein digested in the intestine was the same for both rations.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , May 1971 , pp. 343 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1971

References

Annison, E. F., Chalmers, M. I., Marshall, S. B. M. & Synge, R. L. M. (1954). J. agric. Sci., camb. 44, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, W. G., Purser, D. B. & Clive, J. H. (1968). J. Anim. Sci. 27, 1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, E. M. W., Ellinger, G. M. & Phillipson, A. T. (1966). Proc. R. soc. B 166, 63.Google Scholar
Czerkawski, J. W. (1967). Br. J. Nutr. 21, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, K. A., Hemsley, J. A. & Reis, P. J. (1967). Aust. J. Sci. 30, 215.Google Scholar
Gibbons, L. N. & Grandison, G. S. (1966). Nematologica 12, 642.Google Scholar
Hogan, J. P. & Weston, R. H. (1967). Aust. J. agric. Res. 18, 973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. N. B. (1969). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 28, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, G. O. & Palter, R. (1967). Cereal Chem. 44, 512.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. R. & Emery, R. S. (1962). J. dairy Sci. 45, 765.Google Scholar
McDonald, I. W. (1948). Biochem. J. 42, 584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasset, E. S. & Ju, J. S. (1961). J. Nutr. 74, 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neudoerffer, R. S., Mclaughlin, D. R. & Horney, F. D. (1970). J. Anim. sci. 31, 1042.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J. W. G. & Sutton, J. D. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, A. T. (1964). In Mammalian protein metabolism Vol.I, p.71 [Munro, H. N and Allison, J. B., editors]. New york: Academic press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. H. (1959). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 52, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snook, J. T. & Meyer, J. H. (1964). In The role of the gastrointestinal tract in protein metabolism p. 96. [Munro, H. N., editor].Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar