Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:34:52.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of feed intake and starvation on the magnitude of Na+,K+-ATPase(EC 3.6.1.3)-dependent respiration in duodenal mucosa of sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

B. W. McBride  and
L. P. Milligan
B. W. McBride
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, The University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6G 2P5
L. P. Milligan
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, The University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6G 2P5
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Oxygen consumption and Na+,K+-ATPase(EC 3.6.1.3)-dependent (ouabain-sensitive) and -independent respiration were measured for duodenal mucosa biopsies from 10-month-old sheep given two levels of digestible energy (DE) intake (7.6–7.7 and 14.8 MJ lucerne (Medicago sativa) pellets/d) and following 48 h of starvation.

2. The mucosal biopsies were determined to be structurally intact and free of adherent bacteria on histological and scanning-electron-microscope examinations.

3. The use of D-glucose as a substrate during incubations did not elevate (P > 0.05) the respiration indices of the biopsies over those measured during acetate incubations.

4. Glucose uptake did not (P > 0.05) influence the Na+,K+-ATPase-dependent respiration of the mucosal biopsies.

5. Na+,K+-ATPase-dependent respiration accounted for 50% of the total O2, consumption of the mucosal biopsies of sheep given the lower level of DE.

6. Total O2, consumption of the duodenalmucosa was not (P > 0.05) increased when sheep were given the higher level of DE but Na+,K+-ATPase-dependent respiration of the mucosa was elevated (P < 0.01) by 37% during this period.

7. When sheep were starved for 48 h, total O2, consumption of the mucosal biopsies was not (P > 0.05) affected, however, Na+,K+-ATPase-dependent respiration of the biopsies dropped (P < 0.01) by 45%.

8. Na+,K+-ATPase-dependknt respiration accounted for 61.3% of the O2, uptakes of mucosa from the sheep given the higher level of DE and 28.3% of the 02, uptake of mucosa from fasted sheep.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , May 1985 , pp. 605 - 614
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1985

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, T. F. (1951). Transactions of the New York Academy of science 13, 130–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asano, Y., Liberman, U. A. & Edelman, I. S. (1976). Journal of Clinical Investigation 57, 368–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balaban, R. S., Mandel, L. T., Soltoff, S. & Storey, J. M (1980). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 77, 447–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, R. M. C., Elliott, D. C., Elliott, W. H. & Jones, K. M. (1969). Data for Biochemical Research. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Edelstone, D. I. & Holzman, I. R. (1981). American Journal of Physiology 240, G297–G304.Google Scholar
Flier, J. S., Usher, P. & Deluise, M. (1981). Diabetes 30, 975–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, V. A. & Milligan, L. P. (1980 a). General Pharmacology 11, 323–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, V. A. & Milligan, L. P. (1980 b). Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 95, 608–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, V. A. & Milligan, L. P. (1982 a). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 62, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, V. A. & Milligan, L. P. (1982 b). British Journal of Nutrition 48, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, V. A. & Milligan, L. P. (1982 c). In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, European Association of Animal Production, publication no. 29 pp. 66–69 [Ekern, A. and Sundstøl, F. editors]. EAAP.Google Scholar
Himms-Hagan, J. (1976). Annual Review of Physiology 38, 315–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail-Beigi, F., Bissell, D. M. & Edelman, I. S. (1979). Journal of General Physiology 73, 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail-Beigi, F. & Edelman, I. S. (1970). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 67, 1071–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail-Beigi, F. & Edelman, I. S. (1971). Journal of General Physiology 57, 710–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellner, O. (1926). The Scientific Feeding of Animals [Goodwin, W., translater]. London: Ducksworth.Google Scholar
Levin, R. J. & Syme, G. (1975).Journal of Physiology (London) 245, 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, U. A., Asano, Y., Lo, C.-S. & Edelman, I. S. (1979). Biophysical Journal 27, 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, W. D. & Burch, G. E. (1953). Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 41, 351–362.Google Scholar
McBride, B. W., Berzins, R., Milligan, L. P. & Turner, B. V. (1983). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 63, 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, L. T. & Balaban, R. S. (1981). American Journal of Physiology 240, F357–F371.Google Scholar
Perera, D. R., Weinstein, W. M. & Ruben, C. E. (1975). Human Pathology 6, 157–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quigley, J. P. & Gotterer, G. S. (1969). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 173, 456–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharrer, E. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 49–59 [McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. New England: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Steel, R.G.D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
Umbreit, W. W., Burris, R. H. & Stauffer, J. F. (1964). Manometric Techniques, p. 5. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, R. W., Golan, T. L. & Scharschmidt, B. F. (1983). American Journal of Physiology 244, G523–531.Google Scholar
Vaughan, G. L. & Cook, J. S. (1972). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 69, 2627–2631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. (1980). In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 469–484 [Ruckebusch, Y. and Thivend, P., editors]. Lancaster: MTP Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. (1981). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 40, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. & White, F. (1973). British Journal of Nutrition 29, 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weekes, T. E. C. (1973). Observations on the metabolic role of rumen epithelium. PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Young, B. A., Kerrigan, B. & Christopherson, R. J. (1975). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 55, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar