Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T19:30:07.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of disodium malate on microbial growth and fermentation in rumen-simulation technique fermenters receiving medium- and high-concentrate diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2007

J. A. Gómez ,
M. L. Tejido  and
M. D. Carro
J. A. Gómez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal I, Universidad de León, 24071, León, Spain
M. L. Tejido
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal I, Universidad de León, 24071, León, Spain
M. D. Carro*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal I, Universidad de León, 24071, León, Spain
*
*Corresponding author: Dr M. D. Carro, fax +34 987 291311, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two incubation trials were carried out with the rumen-simulation technique (RUSITEC). In each trial, four vessels received a diet of grass hay and concentrate (600 and 400 g/kg DM, respectively; diet F), and the other four were fed a diet composed of concentrate and barley straw (900 and 100 g/kg DM, respectively; Diet C). Vessels were given 20 g of the corresponding diet daily, and half of them were supplemented with disodium malate to achieve a final concentration of 6.55 mM. There were no effects (P>0·05) of malate either on pH or on the daily production of NH3-N, but malate treatment increased (P<0·05) DM, neutral detergent and acid detergent fibre disappearance after 48 h incubation. The daily production of propionate and butyrate increased (P<0·001), and the ratio CH4:volatile fatty acids decreased (P<0·001) by supplementing both diets with malate. Whereas adding malate to the F diet produced an increase in acetate production (P=0·011) and the growth of solid-associated micro-organisms (P=0·037), no effects (P>0·05) were observed for diet C. For both diets, there were no differences (P>0·05) between treatments in the daily flow of liquid-associated micro-organisms measured using 15N as a microbial marker. These results indicate that malate stimulated the in vitro fermentation of both diets by increasing the apparent disappearance of the diet and decreasing the ratio of CH4:volatile fatty acids, but a greater response was observed with diet F. If these results are confirmed in vivo, malate could be used as a feed additive for ruminants fed diets containing medium proportions of forage (i.e. dairy animals) and not only in animals fed high-concentrate diets, as has so far been proposed.

Keywords

MalateRumen fermentationMicrobial protein synthesisRUSITEC
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 93 , Issue 4 , April 2005 , pp. 479 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2005

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1995) Official Methods of Analysis 16th edn Arlington, VA AOACGoogle Scholar
Barrie, S & Workman, CT (1984) An automated analytical system for nutritional investigations using N-15 tracers. Spectrosc-In J 3, 439–447.Google Scholar
Callaway, TR & Martin, SA (1996) Effects of organic acid and monensin treatment on in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation of cracked corn. J Anim Sci 74, 1982–1989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callaway, TR & Martin, SA (1997) Effects of cellobiose and monensin on in vitro fermentation of organic acids by mixed ruminal bacteria. J Dairy Sci 80, 1126–1135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callaway, TR, Martin, SA, Wampler, JL, Hill, NS & Hill, GM (1997) Malate content of forage varieties commonly fed to cattle. J Dairy Sci 80, 1651–1655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carro, MD & Miller, EL (1999) Effect of supplementing a fibre basal diet with different nitrogen forms on ruminal fermentation and microbial growth in an in vitro semicontinuous culture system (RUSITEC). Br J Nutr 82, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carro, MD & Ranilla, MJ (2003a) Effect of the addition of malate on in vitro rumen fermentation of cereal grains. Br J Nutr 89, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carro, MD & Ranilla, MJ (2003b) Influence of different concentrations of disodium fumarate on methane production and fermentation of concentrate feeds by rumen microorganisms in vitro. Br J Nutr 90, 617–623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carro, MD, Lebzien, P & Rohr, K (1992) Influence of yeast culture on the in vitro fermentation (Rusitec) of diets containing variable portions of concentrates. Anim Feed Sci Technol 37, 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carro, MD, López, S, Valdés, C & Ovejero, FJ (1999) Effect of DL-malate on mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC). Anim Feed Sci Technol 79, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czerkawski, JW (1986) An Introduction to Rumen Studies Oxford Pergammon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czerkawski, JW & Breckenridge, G (1977) Design and development of a long-term rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). Br J Nutr 38, 371–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demeyer, DI & Henderickx, MK (1967) Competitive inhibition of in vitro methane production by mixed rumen bacteria. Arch Int Phys Bioch 75, 157–159.Google ScholarPubMed
Eun, J-S, Fellner, V & Gumpertz, ML (2004) Methane production by mixed ruminal cultures incubated in dual-flow fermenters. J Dairy Sci 87, 112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, S, Valdés, C, Newbold, CJ & Wallace, RJ (1999) Influence of sodium fumarate addition on rumen fermentation in vitro. Br J Nutr 81, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAllister, TA, Bae, HD, Jones, GA & Cheng, KJ (1994) Microbial attachment and feed digestion in the rumen. J Anim Sci 72, 3004–3018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDougall, EI (1948) Studies on ruminant saliva. I. The composition and output of sheep's saliva. Biochem J 43, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, SA (1998) Manipulation of ruminal fermentation with organic acids: a review. J Anim Sci 76, 3123–3132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, SA (2004) Effects of DL-malate on in vitro forage fiber digestion by mixed ruminal microorganisms. Curr Microbiol 48, 27–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, SA & Streeter, MN (1995) Effect of malate on in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation. J Anim Sci 73, 2141–2145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newbold, CJ, Wallace, RJ & McIntosh, FM (1996) Mode of action of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a feed additive for ruminants. Br J Nutr 76, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisbet, DJ & Martin, SA (1990) Effect of dicarboxylic acids and Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on lactate uptake by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. Appl Environ Microb 56, 3515–3518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisbet, DJ & Martin, SA (1993) Effects of fumarate, L-malate, and an Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on D-lactate utilization by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. Curr Microbiol 26, 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranilla, MJ & Carro, MD (2003) Diet and procedures to detach particle-associated microbes from ruminal digesta influence chemical composition of microbes and estimation of microbial growth in Rusitec fermenters. J Anim Sci 81, 537–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, JB (1998) The importance of pH in the regulation of ruminal acetate to propionate ratio and methane production in vitro. J Dairy Sci 81, 3222–3230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, JB, Van Soest, PJ (1984) In vitro ruminal fermentation of organic acids common in forage. Appl Environ Microb 47, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, CS (1977) Factors affecting cellulolytic activity of rumen contents. Appl Environ Microb 33, 497–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tejido, ML, Ranilla, MJ, García-Martinez, R & Carro, MD (2005) In vitro microbial growth and rumen fermentation of diets differing their forage:concentrate ratio as affected by the addition of disodium malate Anim Sci (In the press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB & Lewis, BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weatherburn, MW (1967) Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal Chem 39, 971–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar