Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:04:25.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual variation in fructose metabolism in man

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2009

G. C. Cook  and
Janice Jacobson
G. C. Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, The Royal Free Hospital, London, WC1
Janice Jacobson
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, The Royal Free Hospital, London, WC1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Constant intravenous (3 h) infusions of a fructose solution were given on a rate for body-weight basis (0·6 g/kg per h) to thirty patients who had no evidence of diabetes mellitus or liver disease. Concentrations of blood fructose, pyruvate and lactate formed a plateau during the last 1–1·5 h of the infusion period.

2. Although the numbers were small, the individual pyruvate and lactate concentrations at plateau varied greatly and assumed a bi-modal distribution, suggesting two distinct groups. The group to show a lower pyruvate and lactate rise (group A) contained more males of a lower age and more patients who had ischaemic cardiac disease than the other group (B); none of these differences was, however, statistically significant. The fructose concentrations at plateau were not significantly different between the groups. Serum triglyceride glycerol concentration during the infusions rose markedly in three patients in group A but in none in group B. Minor changes in concentration of blood glucose, insulin, inorganic phosphate and uric acid during the infusions were not significantly different between the groups and did not fall into a bi-modal pattern.

3. Constant intravenous (3 h) infusions of 0.15M-sodiurn lactate at the same infusion rate in eight of the patients (four from group A and four from group B) did not produce a significant difference in the blood lactate concentrations at plateau between patients from the two groups.

4. These results reflect qualitative differences in fructose metabolism in the patients studied. The difference in pyruvate and lactate production may be associated with total carbohydrate intake. However, the bi-modal distribution strongly suggests a genetically determined difference in metabolism between the two groups.

Type
Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , September 1971 , pp. 187 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1971

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. T. (1967). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 20, 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J. L., Atkinson, S. M. & Baron, D. N. (1970). J. clin. Path. 23, 509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bücher, T., Czok, R., Lamprecht, W. & Latzko, E. (1963). In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis p. 253 [Bergmeyer, H. U., editor]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cook, G. C. (1969). Clin. Sci. 37, 675.Google Scholar
Cook, G. C. (1970). Clin. Sci. 38, 687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1946). Statistical Methods for Research Workers 10th ed., p. 70. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Fiske, C. H. & Subbarow, U. (1925). J. biol. Chem. 66, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, D. S., Levy, R. I. & Lees, R. S. (1967). New Engl. J. Med. 276, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froesch, E. R. (1966). In The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease p. 124 [Stanbury, J. B.Wyngaarden, J. B. and Fredrickson, D. S., editors]. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Froesch, E. R. (1969). J. clin. Path. 22, Suppl. 2, p. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hales, C. N. & Randle, P. J. (1963). Biochem. J. 88, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, F., Lamprecht, W. & Kirsch, J. (1968). J. clin. Invest. 47, 1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, R. E., Krehl, W. A., Stone, D. B. & Lopez, A. (1967). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 20, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohorst, H. J. (1963). In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis p. 266 [Bergmeyer, H. U., editor]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, C. D. & Dawson, A. M. (1965). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 118, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotzsch, H. & Bergmeyer, H. U. (1963). In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis p. 156 [Bergmeyer, H. U., editor]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, I. (1968). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 21, 1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, V. (1959). Clinica chim. Acta 4, 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, V. & Samols, E. (1968). In Carbohydrate Metabolism and its Disorders Vol. 2, p. 344 [Dickens, F.Randle, P. J. and Whelan, W. J., editors]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Perheentupa, J. & Raivio, K. (1967). Lancet ii, 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, J. P. & van Slyke, D. D. (1946). Quantitative Clinical Chemistry: Interpretations Vol. 1, p. 204. London: Baillière, Tindall & Cox.Google Scholar
Pitts, F. N. Jr & McClure, J. N. Jr (1967). New Engl. J. Med. 277, 1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Praetorius, E. (1963). In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis p. 500 [Bergmeyer, H. U., editor]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Price-Evans, D. A. (1969). In The Scientific Basis of Medicine Annual Reviews p. 166. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Smith, L. H., Ettinger, R. H., Seligson, D. & Lightcap, S. (1953). J. clin. Invest. 32, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yudkin, J. (1967). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 20, 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakim, D. & Herman, R. H. (1968). Biochim. biophys. Acta 165, 374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zöllner, N., Heuckenkamp, P. U. & Nechwatal, W.M (1968). Klin. Wschr. 46, 1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar