Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:09:21.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Increase in the ileal absorption rate of sodium taurocholate in germ-free or conventional rats given an amylomaize-starch diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

M. Riottot  and
E. Sacquet
M. Riottot
Affiliation:
Laboratoire des Animaux sans Germes du CNRS, CNRZ, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
E. Sacquet
Affiliation:
Laboratoire des Animaux sans Germes du CNRS, CNRZ, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Twenty germ-free and twenty conventional male Fischer 344 rats, 3 months old, were fed ad lib. diets based either on normal or on amylomaize starch for 1 month. The absorption rate of sodium taurocholate. 25 mmol/l, was determined in vivo in jejunal or ileal segments. Each determination included five rats.

2. Jejunal absorption rate was not modified either by the amylomaize-based diet or by the digestive microflora.

3. Ileal absorption rate was slightly higher in germ-free than in conventional rats.

4. Ileal absorption rate was largely increased by the amylomaize-based diet. This increase was slightly larger in germ-free rats than in conventional rats.

5. It is suggested that dietary amylomaize starch has an action on the active absorption process of bile acid.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , March 1985 , pp. 307 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1985

References

Abrams, G. D. & Bishop, J. E. (1967). Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 126, 301–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrieux, C., Gueguen, L. & Sacquet, E. (1980). Reproduction, Nutrition, Developpement 20, 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, S., Glover, D. V., Sugimoto, Y. & Fuwa, H. (1982). Nutrition Reports Intertnational 26, 175–181.Google Scholar
Hofmann, A. F. (1964). In New Biochemical Separations, pp. 362–385 [Morris, L. J. and James, A. T., editors]. Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Kay, R. M. & Truswell, A. S. (1980). In Medical Aspects of Dietary Fiber, pp. 153–174 [Spiller, G. A. and Kay, R. M., editors]. New York: Plenum Medical.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lack, L. & Weiner, I. M. (1973). In The Bile Acids, pp. 33–54 [Nair, P. P. and Kritchevsky, D., editors]. New York: Plenum Press.Google ScholarPubMed
McClintock, C. & Shiau, Y. F. (1983). American Journal of Physiology 7, G507–G514.Google Scholar
Mathé, D. & Chevallier, F. (1981). Nutrition Reports International 23, 689–695.Google Scholar
Nervi, F. O., Gonzalez, A. & Valdivieso, V. D. (1974). Metabolism 23, 495–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riottot, M., Sacquet, E. & Leprince, C. (1984). Digestion 29, 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riottot, M., Sacquet, E., Leprince, C. & Vila, J. P. (1980). Annales de Biologie Animale, de Biochimie et de Biophysique 20, 163–171.Google Scholar
Riottot, M., Sacquet, E., Mejean, C. & Leprince, C. (1975). Nutrition Reports International 12, 1–7.Google Scholar
Riottot, M., Sacquet, E., Mejean, C. & Leprince, C. (1977). Nutrition Reports International 15, 421–427.Google Scholar
Sacquet, E., Garnier, H. & Raibaud, P. (1970). Compte Rendu de la Société de Biologie 164, 532–536.Google Scholar
Sacquet, E., Leprince, C. & Riottot, M. (1979). Annales de Biologie Animale, de Biochimie et de Biophysique 19, 1677–1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacquet, E., Leprince, C. & Riottot, M. (1983). Reproduction, Nutrition, Developpement 23, 783–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacquet, E., Mejean, C., Leprince, C., Riottot, M. & Raibaud, P. (1977). Annales de Nutrition et d' Alimentation 30, 603–617.Google Scholar
Schiff, E. R., Small, N. C. & Dietschy, J. M. (1972). Journal of Clinical Investigation 51, 1351–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklan, D., Budowski, P. & Hunwitz, S. (1976). Lipids 11, 467–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1957). Methodes Statistiques, 6th ed. Paris: Acta.Google Scholar
Vlahcevic, Z. R., Bell, C. E. Jr., Buhac, I., Farrar, J. T. & Swell, L. (1970). Gastroenterology 59, 165–173. 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wostmann, B. S. (1973). Journal of Nutrition 103, 982–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wostmann, B. S., Bruckner-Kardoss, E., Beaver, Y., Chang, L. & Madsen, D. (1976). Journal of Nutrition 106, 1782–1790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar