Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:14:59.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incorporating turnover in estimates of protein retention efficiency for different body tissues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2007

C. Z. Roux
C. Z. Roux*
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, Republic of South Africa
*
*Corresponding author: Professor C. Z. Roux, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Formulated in terms of protein synthesis (PS) and protein retention (PR), a definition of turnover-related protein retention efficiency (kP) allows the expression kP=[1+(PS/PR)/6]−1, 6 representing the ratio of the energy equivalent of protein to the cost of synthesis. By combining plausible hormonal and cellular control mechanisms of protein (P) growth, it is possible to derive (PS/PR)=[Q{(P/α)−(4/9)Y−1}]−1+1, allowing the calculation of kP by substitution. The symbol α represents the limit value of protein growth, while the term 4/9 derives from the power in the relationship between the concentration of growth factor-related activator in the nucleus and cell volume (cv). Y is the power in the relationship between cv and total tissue protein, and Q represents the proportion of growth factor-activated nuclei in a tissue. The proportion Q can be estimated from simple functions of intake rates or blood growth factor concentrations. Estimates of Y are derived from histological considerations or calculated from experimental observations; Y=1 for multinucleated skeletal muscle fibres and Y=1/3, 1/2, 1/6 on average for mononucleated cell tissues, skin or bone and viscera, respectively. To apply kP to the whole body, an average value of Y=1/2 can be taken. Experimental observations on tissue protein synthesis and breakdown rates yield direct estimates of kP in satisfactory agreement with comparable theoretical predictions.

Keywords

Protein turnoverProtein retention efficiencyBody tissues
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , February 2006 , pp. 246 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2006

References

Agricultural Research Council The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. 1981Google Scholar
Baldwin, RL & Black, JLSimulation of the Effects of Nutritional and Physiological Status on the Growth of Mammalian Tissues. Animal Res. Lab. Tech. Paper No.6. Clayton South, Victoria, Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization. 1979Google Scholar
Bergen, WG & Merkel, RA Protein accretion. In Growth Regulation in Farm Animals. AM, Pearson and Dutson, TRLondon: Elsevier Applied Science. 1991 169–198Google Scholar
Blaxter, KLEnergy Metabolism in Animals and Man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1989Google Scholar
Conde, RD & Scornick, OAFaster synthesis and slower degradation of liver protein during developmental growth. Biochem J 1977 166 115 –121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czech, MSignal transmission by the insulin-like growth factors. Cell 1989 59 235–238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, SR, Barry, TN & Hughson, GA (1981) Protein synthesis in tissues of growing lambs. Br J Nutr 46 409–419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiMarco, ON, Baldwin, RL & Calvert, CCSimulation of DNA, protein and fat accretion in growing steers. Agric Syst 1989 29 21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmunds, BK, Buttery, PJ & Fisher, CProtein and energy metabolism in the growing pig. In Energy Metabolism, pp. 124–133. [Mount, LE, editor]. London: Butterworths. 1980Google Scholar
Enesco, M & Leblond, CPIncrease in cell number as a factor in the growth of the organs and tissues of the young male rat. J Embryol Exp Morph 1962 10 530–562Google Scholar
Goldspink, GProspectives for the manipulation of muscle growth. InGrowth Regulation in Farm Animals pp. 557–588. (AM, Pearson and TR, Dutson, London: Elsevier Applied Science. 1991Google Scholar
Goldspink, DF & Kelly, FJProtein turn-over and growth in the whole body, liver and kidney of the rat from the foetus to senility. Biochem J 1984 217 507–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldspink, DF, Lewis, SEM & Kelly, FJProtein synthesis during the developmental growth of the small and large intestine of the rat. Biochem J 1984 217 527–534CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knap, PWTime trends of Compertz growth parameters in meat-type pigs. Anim Sci 2000 70, 39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latchman, DSGene Regulation, 5th ed. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis. 2005Google Scholar
Levine, M & Tjian, RTranscription regulation and animal diversity. Nature 2003 424, 147–151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linzbach, AJThe muscle fibre constant and the law of growth of ventricles of the human heart. Virchows Arch 1950 318, 575–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobley, GE, Milne, V, Lovie, JM, Reeds, PJ & Pennie, KWhole body and tissue protein synthesis in cattle. Br J Nutr 1980 43, 491–502CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNurlan, MA, & Garlick, PJ (1980) Contribution of rat liver and gastrointestinal tract to whole body protein synthesis in the rat. Biochem J 178, 373–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, FPThe relationship between the dimensions of the fibres and the number of nuclei during normal growth of the skeletal muscle in the domestic fowl. Am J Anat 1968 122, 555–564CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oltjen, JW, Bywater, AL & Baldwin, RLSimulation of normal protein accretion in rats. J Nutr 1985 115, 45–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preedy, VR, McNurlan, MA & Garlick, PJProtein synthesis in skin and bone of the young rat. Br J Nutr 1983 49, 517–523CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roux, CZGrowth equations for skeletal muscle derived from the cytonuclear ratio and growth constraining supplementary functions. Anim Sci 1999 68, 129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roux, CZIncorporating turn-over in whole body protein retention efficiency in pigs. Anim Sci 2005a 80, 71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roux, CZIncorporating turn-over in whole body protein retention efficiency in cattle and sheep. Anim Sci 2005b 80, 345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Se`ve, B, Balle`vre, O, Ganier, P, Noblet, J, Prugnaud, J & Obled, CRecombinant porcine somatotropin and dietary protein enhance protein synthesis in growing pigs. J Nutr 1993 123, 529–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, OMetabolism of proteins and amino acids In Protein Metabolism in Farm Animals, pp. 367–403(HD, Bock, BO, Eggum, AG, Low and T, Zebrowska editors]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1989Google Scholar
Southon, S, Livesey, G, Gee, JM & Johnson, ITDifferences in intestinal protein synthesis and cellular proliferation inwell-nourished rats consuming conventional laboratory diets. Br J Nutr 1985 53, 87–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swatland, HJStructure and Development of Meat Animals. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall. 1984Google Scholar
Teissier, GSur le rapport nucle'oplasmatique des cellules de mammife`res Compt rend soc boil 1941 135, 662–666Google Scholar
van Milgen, JBernier, JFLecozler, Y, Dubois, S & Noblet, JMajor determinants of fasting heat production and energetic cost of activity in growing pigs of different body weight and breed/castration combination Br J Nutr 1998 79 509–517CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Bertalanffy, LPrinciples and theory of growth. InFundamental Aspects of Normal and Malignant Growth pp. 137–259.(WW, Nowinski, editor]. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1960Google Scholar
Winick, M & Noble, A (1965) Quantitative changes in DNA, RNA and protein during prenatal and postnatal growth in the rat. Dev Biol 12, 451–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed