Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:01:53.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Importance of palatability in determining the feed intake of sheep offered chopped and pelleted hay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. I. Van Niekerk ,
J. F. D. Greenhalgh  and
G. W. Reid
A. I. Van Niekerk
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
J. F. D. Greenhalgh
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
G. W. Reid
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. In the first of three experiments four sheep received chopped (C) and pelleted (P) hay by mouth (m) or rumen fistula (f) in the four combinations shown below. Feed eaten by mouth was offered ad lib. from 09·15 to 16·00 hours; feed was given by fistula at 09·00 hours in amounts equal to half of total intake (i.e. by mouth and by fistula) on the previous day. Daily dry-matter intake (g/kg metabolic live weight, W0·75) was as follows: treatment CmCf, 51·5; CmPf, 74·5; PmCf, 57·8; PmPf, 85·7. The corresponding dry-matter digestibility coefficients were 0·59, 0·56, 0·57 and 0·53.

2. The intention was that the difference in intake between CmPf and PmCf should provide a measure of palatability, since the animals digested the same composite diet but ate different components of it. For the comparison to be valid the two treatments had to promote equal rates of digestion, but measurements of rumen fill and of rate of passage of digesta suggested that Cf was digested more slowly than Cm.

3. In Expt 2, each form of hay was given entirely by mouth or partly by fistula. Daily dry-matter intake (g/kg W0·75) was as follows: Cm, 45·5; CmCf, 42·4; Pm, 80·4; PmPf, 79·2. In this experiment there was less evidence of Cf being digested more slowly and hence depressing intake.

4. The conclusion drawn from these two experiments is that fistula feeding in its present form is not a suitable technique for measuring the relative palatability of feeds differing considerably in physical structure. However, the technique might be improved if food given by rumen fistula to one animal was previously masticated by, and collected from the oesophageal fistula of, a second animal.

5. In Expt 3, the effects of sudden changes from a composite diet to either C or P, or from C to P or vice versa were measured in sheep receiving food by mouth only. The patterns of intake suggested that total intake might be partially determined by feed palatability.

Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , July 1973 , pp. 95 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1973

References

Bailey, C. B. & Balch, C. C. (1961). Br. J. Nutr. 15, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. & Wainman, F. W. (1956). Br. J. Nutr. 10, 69.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. & Freer, M. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 229.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. (1971). Revta cub. Cienc. agric. (Engl. ed.) 5, 155.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & Reid, G. W. (1967). Nature, Lond. 214, 744.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & Reid, G. W. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 26, 107.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & Wainman, F. W. (1972). Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 61.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J., Blaxter, K. L. & McDonald, I. (1967). Anim. Prod. 9, 463.Google Scholar
Waldo, D. R., Miller, R. W., Okamoto, M. & Moore, L. A. (1965). J. Dairy Sci. 48, 1473.Google Scholar
Weston, R. H. (1966). Aust. J. agric. Res. 17, 939.Google Scholar