Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:01:21.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immune response in mice to ingested soya protein: antibody production, oral tolerance and maternal transfer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Hanne R. Christensen ,
Susanne Brix  and
Hanne Frøkiær
Hanne R. Christensen*
Affiliation:
BioCentrum-DTU, Biochemistry and Nutrition, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Susanne Brix
Affiliation:
BioCentrum-DTU, Biochemistry and Nutrition, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Hanne Frøkiær
Affiliation:
BioCentrum-DTU, Biochemistry and Nutrition, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Hanne R. Christensen, fax +45 45 88 63 07, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

While allergic reactions to soya are increasingly investigated, the normal immune response to ingested soya is scarcely described. In the present study, we wanted to characterise the soya-specific immune response in healthy mice ingesting soya protein. Mice fed a soya-containing diet (F0) and mice of the first (F1) and second (F2) offspring generation bred on a soya protein-free diet were used either directly or were transferred between the soya-containing and soya protein-free diet during pregnancy or neonatal life. The mice were compared as to levels of naturally occurring specific antibodies analysed by ELISA, and to the presence of oral tolerance detected as a suppressed antibody and cell-proliferation response upon immunisation with soya protein. F0 mice generated soya-specific antibodies, while oral tolerance to the same soya proteins was also clearly induced. When F0 dams were transferred to soya protein-free feed before mating, the F1 and F2 offspring generations showed no significantly different response, indicating that soya-specific immune components were not maternally transmitted. However, the ingestion of dietary soya protein by F1 mice during late pregnancy and lactation caused a lasting antibody response in the offspring, but in this case in the absence of oral tolerance. This indicates that, under certain conditions, factors involved in spontaneous antibody production can be transmitted from mother to offspring. Understanding the immune response to soya protein ingested under healthy conditions is important in the assessment of adverse effects of soya protein and in the use of animal allergy models. The present results add to this understanding.

Keywords

Soya proteinOral immunogenicityAntibodies to dietary antigensOral tolerance
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 91 , Issue 5 , May 2004 , pp. 725 - 732
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2004

References

Ahmed, T, Sumazaki, R, Nagai, Y, Shibasaki, M & Takita, H (1997) Immune response to food antigens: kinetics of food-specific antibodies in the normal population. Acta Paediatr Jpn 39, 322–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arvola, M, Gustafsson, E, Svensson, L, Jansson, L, Holmdahl, R, Heyman, B, Okabe, M & Mattsson, R (2000) Immunoglobulin-secreting cells of maternal origin can be detected in B cell-deficient mice. Biol Reprod 63, 1817–1824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atherton, KT, Dearman, RJ & Kimber, I (2002) Protein allergenicity in mice - a potential approach for hazard identification. Ann N Y Acad Sci 964, 163–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, M, Miller, BG, Telemo, E, Stokes, CR & Bourne, FJ (1993) Specific immunological unresponsiveness following active primary responses to proteins in the weaning diet of piglets. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 101, 266–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkholt, V & Jensen, AL (1989) Amino-acid analysis - determination of cystein plus half-cystein in proteins after hydrochloric-acid hydrolysis with a disulfide compound as additive. Anal Biochem 177, 318–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, RMR, Johnson, PM, Blears, J, Harvey, MM & Finn, R (1988) Human-serum antibodies reactive with dietary proteins - antigenic specificity. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 87, 189–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bednar-Tantscher, E, Mudde, GC & Rot, A (2001) Maternal antigen stimulation downregulates via mother's milk the specific immune responses in young mice. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 126, 300–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, HR, Bruun, SW & Frøkiær, H (2003) Antigenic specificity of serum antibodies in mice fed soy protein. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 132, 58–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coombs, RRA, Kieffer, M, Fraser, DR & Frazier, PJ (1983) Naturally developing antibodies to wheat gliadin fractions and to other cereal antigens in rabbits, rats and guinea-pigs on normal laboratory diets. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 70, 200–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faria, AMC, Maron, R, Ficker, SM, Slavin, AJ, Spahn, T & Weiner, HL (2003) Oral tolerance induced by continuous feeding: enhanced up-regulation of transforming growth factor-beta/interleukin-10 and suppression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Autoimm 20, 135–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, A & Weiner, HL (1994) Induction of anergy or active suppression following oral tolerance is determined by antigen dosage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91, 6688–6692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregerson, DS, Obritsch, WF & Donoso, LA (1993) Oral tolerance in experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis - distinct mechanisms of resistance are induced by low-dose vs high-dose feeding protocols. J Immunol 151, 5751–5761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, LA, Korotkova, M, Lundin, S, Haversen, L, Silfverdal, SA, Mattsby-Baltzer, I, Strandvik, B & Telemo, E (2003) The transfer of immunity from mother to child. Imm Mechn Dis 987, 199–206.Google ScholarPubMed
Helm, RM, Cockrell, G, Connaughton, C, Sampson, HA, Bannon, GA, Beilinson, V, Livingstone, D, Nielsen, NC & Burks, AW (2000) A soybean G2 glycinin allergen - 1. Identification and characterization. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 123, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herian, AM, Taylor, SL & Bush, RK (1993) Allergenic reactivity of various soybean products as determined by RAST inhibition. J Food Sci 58, 385–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiemori, M, Bando, N, Ogawa, T, Shimada, H, Tsuji, H, Yamanishi, R & Terao, J (2000) Occurrence of IgE antibody-recognizing N-linked glycan moiety of a soybean allergen, Gly m Bd 28K. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 122, 238–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husby, S (2000) Normal immune responses to ingested foods. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 30, S13–S19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husby, S, Jensenius, JC & Svehag, SE (1986) Passage of undegraded dietary antigen into the blood of healthy adults - further characterization of the kinetics of uptake and the size distribution of the antigen. Scand J Immunol 24, 447–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hvatum, M, Scott, H & Brandtzaeg, P (1992) Serum subclass antibodies to a variety of food antigens in patients with celiac disease. Gut 33, 632–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjaer, TMR & Frokiaer, H (2002) Induction of oral tolerance with micro-doses of ovomucoid depends on the length of the feeding period. Scand J Immunol 55, 359–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knippels, LM, Penninks, AH & Houben, GF (1998 a) Continued expression of anti-soy protein antibodies in rats bred on a soy protein-free diet for one generation: the importance of dietary control in oral sensitization research. J Allergy Clin Immunol 101, 815–820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knippels, LM, Penninks, AH, Spanhaak, S & Houben, GF (1998 b) Oral sensitization to food proteins: a Brown Norway rat model. Clin Exp Allergy 28, 368–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knippels, LMJ & Penninks, AH (2002) Assessment of protein allergenicity – studies in Brown Norway rats. Ann N Y Acad Sci 964, 151–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreira, MA, Hermodson, MA, Larkins, BA & Nielsen, NC (1979) Partial characterization of the acidic and basic polypeptides of glycinin. J Biol Chem 254, 9921–9926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mowat, AM (1987) The regulation of immune responses to dietary protein antigens. Immunol Today 8, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordlee, JA, Taylor, SL, Townsend, JA, Thomas, LA & Bush, RK (1996) Identification of a Brazil-nut allergen in transgenic soybeans. N Engl J Med 334, 688–692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strobel, S & Mowat, AM (1998) Immune responses to dietary antigens: oral tolerance. Immunol Today 19, 173–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szepfalusi, Z, Loibichler, C, Pichler, J, Reisenberger, K, Ebner, C & Urbanek, R (2000 a) Direct evidence for transplacental allergen transfer. Pediatr Res 48, 404–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szepfalusi, Z, Pichler, J, Elsasser, S, Van Duren, K, Ebner, C, Bernaschek, G & Urbanek, R (2000 b) Transplacental priming of the human immune system with environmental allergens can occur early in gestation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 106, 530–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, AD, Stokes, CR & Bourne, FJ (1989) Effect of age on absorption and immune responses to weaning or introduction of novel dietary antigens in pigs. Res Vet Sci 46, 180–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed