Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:38:50.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hydrolysis of the phytate of wheat flour during breadmaking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

D. G. H. Daniels  and
N. Fisher
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Differences in the extent of breakdown of phytate in wholemeal and white flours prepared from three wheats when the flours were made into bread using the three main UK commercial breadmaking processes were investigated.

2. The extent of breakdown (31–46% for wholemeal breads, 88–99% for white breads) was not proportional to the relative processing times involved (1–4 h). The importance of destruction of phytate in the oven is stressed.

3. The phytase (myo-inositol hexaphosphate phosphohydrolase. EC 3.1.3.8) activities of the wholemeal flours and of the yeast were determined. Re-examination of some information in the literature enabled the relative importance of these activities, and of the various stages of breadmaking, in determining the extent of hydrolysis of phytate to be assessed.

4. Average values for the molar ratio, phytate: zinc, of 22:1 and 0.8:1 were calculated for wholemeal and white breads respectively. The nutritional significance of these results is discussed.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , July 1981 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1981

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, G. (1963). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 14, 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous, (1967). Nutr. Rev. 25, 218.Google Scholar
Anonymous, (1973). Wld Hlth Org. tech. Rep. Ser. 532, 13.Google Scholar
Anonymous, (1979). Nutr. Rev. 37, 365.Google Scholar
Bell, B. M., Chamberlain, N., Collins, T. H., Daniels, D. G. H. & Fisher, N. (1979). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 30, 1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J. H. (1978). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 31, 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, N. T. (1978). J. Plant Foods, 3, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, N. T. (1979 a). Bull. Br. Nutr. Fdn. 5, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, N. T. (1979 b). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 38, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, N. T., Hristic, V. & Flett, A. A. (1977). Nutr. Rep. int. 15, 207.Google Scholar
Davies, N. T. & Olpin, S. E. (1979). Br. J. Nutr. 41, 591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lange, D. J., Joubert, C. P. & du Preez, S. F. M. (1961). Proc. Nutr. Soc. Southern Africa, 2, 69.Google Scholar
Food Standards Committee (1974). Second Report on Bread and Flour. London: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Harland, B. F. & Harland, J. (1980). Cereal Chem. 57, 226.Google Scholar
Harland, B. F. & Prosky, L. (1979). Cereal Foods World, 24, 387.Google Scholar
McCance, R. A. & Widdowson, E. M. (1942). J. Physiol., Lond. 101, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food (1976). Fertilisers and Feedingstuffs (Amendment) Regulations 1976. London: HM Stationery Office, Schedule 5, Method 7.Google Scholar
Morris, E. R. & Ellis, R. (1976). J. Nutr. 106, 753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, A. A. & Southgate, D. A. T. (1978). McCance & Widdowson's ‘The Composition of Foods’ 4th revised ed. London: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Peers, F. G. (1953). Biochem. J. 53, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, W. J. S. & Moran, T. (1942). J. Soc. chem. Ind. 61, 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhold, J. G. (1975). J. Am. Diet. Ass. 66, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, T. G. (1965). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 24, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. (1941). Nature, Lond. 148, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zook, E. G., Greene, F. E. & Morris, E. R. (1970). Cereal Chem. 47, 720.Google Scholar