Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:38:50.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Human milk oligosaccharides are differentially metabolised in neonatal rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2013

Evelyn Jantscher-Krenn
Affiliation:
Division of Neonatal Medicine and Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, 200 West Arbor Drive, MC 8450, San Diego, CA92103-8450, USA
Carolin Marx
Affiliation:
Division of Neonatal Medicine and Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, 200 West Arbor Drive, MC 8450, San Diego, CA92103-8450, USA
Lars Bode*
Affiliation:
Division of Neonatal Medicine and Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, 200 West Arbor Drive, MC 8450, San Diego, CA92103-8450, USA
*
*Corresponding author: L. Bode, fax +1 619 543 7537, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) are complex glycans that are highly abundant in human milk, but not in infant formula. Accumulating data, mostly from in vitro and animal studies, indicate that HMO benefit the breast-fed infant in multiple ways and in different target organs. In vitro incubation studies suggest that HMO can resist the low pH in the infant's stomach and enzymatic degradation in the small intestine and reach the colon in the same composition as in the mother's milk. The oligosaccharide composition in faeces of breast-fed infants is, however, very different from that in the mother's milk, raising questions on when, where and how HMO are metabolised between ingestion and excretion. To answer some of these questions, we established a pulse-chase model in neonatal rats and analysed HMO profiles to track their composition over time in five consecutive equal-length intestinal segments as well as in serum and urine. The relative abundance of individual HMO changed significantly within the first 2 h after feeding and already in the segments of the small intestine prior to reaching the colon. Only 3′-sialyllactose, the major oligosaccharide in rat milk, and hardly any other HMO appeared in the serum and the urine of HMO-fed rats, indicating a selective absorption of rat milk-specific oligosaccharides. The present results challenge the paradigm that HMO reach the colon and other target organs in the same composition as originally secreted with the mother's milk. The present results also raise questions on whether rats and other animals represent suitable models to study the effects of HMO.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012 

With every feeding, breast-fed infants ingest high amounts of unconjugated, complex glycans called human milk oligosaccharides (HMO). A volume of 1 litre of mature human milk contains between 10 and 20 g of HMO, and the concentrations in colostrum can be even higher (reviewed in Bode(Reference Bode1, Reference Bode2), Kunz et al. (Reference Kunz, Rudloff and Baier3)). A large body of evidence indicates that HMO benefit the breast-fed infant in multiple ways that reach from protection against infections(Reference Bode2Reference Newburg, Ruiz-Palacios and Morrow4) and augmentation of gut maturation(Reference Kuntz, Kunz and Rudloff5, Reference Kuntz, Rudloff and Kunz6) to enhancement of brain development(Reference Wang7) and protection from necrotising enterocolitis(Reference Jantscher-Krenn, Zherebtsov and Nissan8). Most of the supporting data stem from studies that isolate HMO from human milk and then directly assess their effects in in vitro or ex vivo models. This approach, however, is based on the assumption that HMO reach the target organs and tissues in the same composition as originally excreted with the milk, which may not be the case.

HMO consist of glucose, galactose (Gal), N-acetylglucosamine, fucose and sialic acid. All HMO carry lactose (Galβ1–4 glucose) at the reducing end and can be elongated with up to fifteen heteromeric Gal/N-acetylglucosamine disaccharides. Lactose or the linear or branched oligosaccharides can be further fucosylated and/or sialylated in various different linkages, leading to a diverse pool of complex oligosaccharides(Reference Bode1, Reference Kunz, Rudloff and Baier3, Reference Kobata9). More than 100 different HMO have been characterised so far(Reference Kobata9), but not each and every woman produces the entire set of HMO, which depends highly on genetic and, potentially, environmental factors and changes over the course of lactation. At least some of their beneficial effects are highly structure-dependent and are ablated or abolished when HMO are partially degraded or structurally modified(Reference Jantscher-Krenn, Zherebtsov and Nissan8, Reference Bode, Kunz and Muhly-Reinholz10Reference Ruiz-Palacios, Cervantes and Ramos14).

On the one hand, in vitro studies show that HMO resist a low pH that resembles conditions in the infant's stomach, and that HMO are only minimally degraded by the pancreatic and brush-border enzymes that model the infant's proximal small intestine(Reference Engfer, Stahl and Finke15, Reference Gnoth, Kunz and Kinne-Saffran16). On the other hand, in vitro data and most recent in vivo studies in mice strongly suggest that certain bacteria in the infant's intestine are capable of metabolising HMO(Reference Asakuma, Hatakeyama and Urashima17Reference Marcobal, Barboza and Sonnenburg20). Comprehensive analysis of infant faeces confirmed partial HMO degradation and bioconversion in the infant's gastrointestinal tract, resulting in profiles remarkably different from the HMO profiles in their mother's milk(Reference Albrecht, Schols and van den Heuvel21Reference Albrecht, Schols and van Zoeren23). When and where along the digestive tract HMO are degraded and modified remain unknown.

Active and passive mechanisms facilitate the transport of HMO across monolayers of human intestinal epithelial cells(Reference Gnoth, Rudloff and Kunz24). In addition, elegant 13C-labelling studies show that HMO appear in the urine of breast-fed infants(Reference Rudloff, Obermeier and Borsch25, Reference Rudloff, Pohlentz and Borsch26). The combined in vitro and in vivo data suggest that approximately 1 % of the ingested HMO are absorbed, reach the systemic circulation and are excreted with the urine. The HMO composition in the urine, however, is not identical to that of the corresponding milk.

Animal models are being used increasingly to investigate the potential biological effects of HMO(Reference Jantscher-Krenn, Zherebtsov and Nissan8, Reference Ruiz-Palacios, Cervantes and Ramos14, Reference Marcobal, Barboza and Sonnenburg20, Reference Fuhrer, Sprenger and Kurakevich27), but little is known about their kinetics of absorption and metabolism. Here, we used an in vivo pulse-chase digestion model in neonatal rats and monitored the HMO composition over time in five consecutive equal-length intestinal segments between the pylorus and the anus, as well as in the blood and urine. In the same model, we also determined the absorption and metabolism of galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) that are commonly added to infant formula in an attempt to mimic some of the beneficial effects of HMO. So far, the common notion had been that both HMO and GOS reach the colon intact, where they serve as prebiotics and are metabolised by certain bacteria(Reference Kunz, Rudloff and Baier3, Reference Newburg, Ruiz-Palacios and Morrow4, Reference German, Freeman and Lebrilla28). Our data suggest that the structural composition of HMO already changes in proximal parts of the intestine and that the structures originally found in human milk or infant formula may in fact not always reach the target organs or tissues as originally anticipated.

Materials and methods

Human milk oligosaccharide standards and galacto-oligosaccharides

2′-Fucosyllactose (2′FL), 3-fucosyllactose, 3′-sialyllactose (3′SL), 6′-sialyllactose, lacto-N-tetraose and lacto-N-fucopentaose 1 (LNFP1) were purchased from V-Labs, Inc. GOS syrup (Vivinal®, DM 75 %) was kindly provided by Friesland Campina Domo. Apart from 59 % GOS, the product also contains 21 % lactose, 19 % glucose and 1 % Gal.

Isolation of human milk oligosaccharides

Healthy lactating women were recruited at the UCSD Medical Center, San Diego, CA, and human milk was collected after written informed consent was obtained, and the research was approved by the University's Institute Review Board. Oligosaccharides were isolated from the pooled human milk, as previously reported(Reference Jantscher-Krenn, Zherebtsov and Nissan8, Reference Jantscher-Krenn, Lauwaet and Bliss12). Briefly, following delipidation, proteins were precipitated from the aqueous phase by addition of ice-cold ethanol and subsequent centrifugation. Ethanol was evaporated from the HMO-containing supernatant under vacuum. Lactose and salts were removed by size-exclusion chromatography over a BioRad P2 column (100 cm × 16 mm; Bio-Rad) using a semi-automated fast protein liquid chromatography system.

Animals

Institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed, and all experimental procedures involving animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of California, San Diego, CA. Time-pregnant Sprague–Dawley rats were purchased from Harlan. After birth, pups were housed with the dam. On the third day of life, pups were separated from the dam and fasted for 12 h overnight in a humidified incubator at 34°C. Control animals stayed with the dam (dam-fed, DF). A group of pups was killed immediately after the fasting period and served as fasted baseline control. Other pups were orally adminstered with 300 μl formula alone (FF), formula with HMO (FF+HMO, 15 mg/ml) or formula with GOS (FF+GOS, 8 mg/ml). Oral administration was performed with a twenty-four gauge L-Cath Peel Away System PICC catheter (Becton Dickinson Infusion Therapy Systems, Inc.)(Reference Jantscher-Krenn, Zherebtsov and Nissan8, Reference Barlow and Santulli29). A 2 cm mark on the catheter ensured that all catheters were inserted and placed correctly. Slight resistance prior to reaching the 2 cm mark indicated that the catheter was wrongfully placed into the trachea instead of the oesophagus. In that case, the catheter was removed and insertion repeated. Once the catheter was placed correctly, 300 μl formula was slowly injected through an attached syringe. Afterwards, the catheter was removed slowly. Rat formula contained 15 g Similac 60/40 (Ross Pediatrics) and 75 ml Esbilac (Pet-Ag, Inc.). Pups were euthanised at different times post-feeding (n 3 for each time point). Blood was collected from the decapitation site. Urine was aspirated from the bladder. Entire intestines (from the pyloric opening to the anal opening) were removed. Since it was difficult to consistently and reliably differentiate anatomical sites (duodenum, jejunum, ileum, caecum and colon) at the third day of life, entire intestines were cut in five equal-length sections. Sections 1–3 represent the small intestine with the duodenum and jejunum. Section 4 represents distal parts of the jejunum and ileum. Section 5 represents mostly the colon. For some experiments, luminal content from the different sections was directly aspirated with a 10 μl pipette tip, flash frozen and stored at − 80°C (n 3 for each time point). A volume of 0·5 μl luminal content was sufficient for HPLC analysis, which allowed for sampling without compromising the integrity of the intestinal wall and guaranteed that our luminal content sample was free of intestinal tissue. For most other experiments, entire intestinal tissue sections that included the luminal content were placed in a tube with 500 μl water and immediately heated for 5 min at 100°C to inactivate intestinal and intracellular enzymes. After sonication and centrifugation, supernatants were stored at − 80°C.

Isolation and purification of human milk oligosaccharides and galacto-oligosaccharides from animal specimens

To isolate pre-labelled HMO or unlabelled HMO, intestinal tissue samples were centrifuged twice at 6800 g to remove tissue debris and lipids. Intestinal tissue (500 μl) or serum (50 μl diluted in 400 μl water) samples were cleaned up using the chloroform–methanol method, as previously described for isolation of glycans from milk samples(Reference Jantscher-Krenn, Zherebtsov and Nissan8, Reference Jantscher-Krenn, Lauwaet and Bliss12) with the following modifications. A volume of 1 ml chloroform was added to the samples and centrifuged at 1300 g for 15 min. The aqueous phase was transferred into fresh microtubes and centrifuged again after the addition of 800 μl chloroform–methanol. Following transfer to a fresh tube, 300 μl water were added to the aqueous phase to precipitate more proteins. Samples were centrifuged again and the supernatant was further cleaned up using C18 and carbograph spin columns, as previously described(Reference Jantscher-Krenn, Zherebtsov and Nissan8, Reference Jantscher-Krenn, Lauwaet and Bliss12). Luminal contents were diluted in the ratio 1:4000 with water, and subjected to C18 and carbograph spin columns. Urine samples (50 μl) were also cleaned up using C18 and carbograph spin columns without prior chloroform–methanol extraction.

Profiling of human milk oligosaccharides and galacto-oligosaccharides by HPLC with fluorescence detection

Recovered, dried HMO and GOS from the intestinal samples were fluorescently labelled with 2-aminobenzamide (2AB), as previously described(Reference Jantscher-Krenn, Zherebtsov and Nissan8, Reference Jantscher-Krenn, Lauwaet and Bliss12). The 2AB-glycans were separated by HPLC with fluorescence detection on an amide-80 column (4·6 mm inner diameter × 25 cm, 5 μm; Tosoh Bioscience), with a linear gradient of a 50 mm-ammonium formate/acetonitrile buffer system. Separation was performed at 25°C and monitored by a fluorescence detector at 360 nm excitation and 425 nm emission. Standard retention times and MS analysis were used to annotate HPLC peaks. The amount of each individual HMO was calculated based on pre-determined response factors. Relative abundance of each of the individual HMO was determined by setting the sum of the thirteen major HMO as 100 % total HMO.

Analysis of human milk oligosaccharides by MS

HPLC peak-fraction samples were analysed by MS on a Thermo LCQ Duo Ion trap mass spectrometer equipped with a Nano-ESI-source. MS was conducted in positive ion mode and sodiated ions were detected with m/z values increased by 120 Da corresponding to the 2AB label. All mass spectra were acquired over approximately 30 s in a mass/charge range of 300 to 2000 Da.

Analysis of human milk oligosaccharides by enzymatic digest

To confirm the identity of individual peaks in urine, 2AB-labelled samples were either treated with α2-3,6,8,9-neuraminidase (Sigma) or α1-2-fucosidase according to the manufacturer's instructions (both Sigma). Enzyme-treated and untreated samples were run in parallel and analysed by HPLC with fluorescence detection as described above.

Statistical analysis

Relative abundance of oligosaccharides in the different intestinal segments and at different time points were calculated as means and standard deviations, with n 3 rat pups per time point. Differences in the relative abundance of each oligosaccharide between different intestinal segments at a given time or between different time points in the same segment were calculated by one-way ANOVA (Prism 5 for Mac OS X; GraphPad Software). P values < 0·05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Human milk oligosaccharides can be detected in rat intestines, serum and urine without interference from other dietary or endogenous oligosaccharides and without degradation during sample processing

Prior to determining the fate of HMO during intestinal passage, we established a method to measure HMO composition in different intestinal sections at different time points. The method needed to distinguish HMO from other exogenous dietary oligosaccharides present in rat milk or formula, as well as from endogenous oligosaccharides, e.g. on intestinal epithelial cells. The method also needed to ensure that HMO are not degraded by intracellular glycosidases that may be released during tissue disruption in the sample collection process.

First, we assessed whether HMO can be distinguished from endogenous oligosaccharides and whether HMO are degraded or modified during tissue processing. Fasted rat pups received an HMO feed (15 mg/ml) and their intestines were collected 2 h later. In one group, we took samples of only the luminal content from each of the five intestinal segments and analysed the oligosaccharide composition. In the other group, we took the entire tissue for each of the five segments, heat-inactivated potential glycosidases and analysed the glycan composition. For all five intestinal segments, the HPLC oligosaccharide profiles were very similar between luminal aspirates (Fig. 1(A) and Supplementary Fig. S1, available online) and whole tissue lysates (Fig. 1(B) and Supplmentary Fig. S1, available online). These results showed that endogenous intestinal tissue oligosaccharides do not contaminate our HPLC results and that HMO are not degraded during tissue disruption in the sample collection process. Since the collection and handling of samples from the narrow lumen of neonatal intestines were challenging, we chose to use whole tissue lysates in all following experiments.

Fig. 1 Human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) can be detected in rat intestines without interference from other dietary or endogenous oligosaccharides and without degradation during sample processing. Representative HPLC chromatograms of oligosaccharides isolated from intestinal segments. Oligosaccharide composition in the third intestinal segment is not different whether (A) luminal aspirates alone or (B) entire tissue lysates are analysed (Supplementary Fig. S1 (available online) shows representative chromatograms from other intestinal sections). (C) 3′-Sialyllactose (*) is the major oligosaccharide in the intestines of dam-fed pups, (D) almost absent from the first four segments of fasted pups, (E) but still present in the fifth and most distal intestinal segment in fasted pups. (F) HMO are not present in the intestines of pups that received formula alone, without the addition of HMO. Peaks are annotated as follows: (1) 2′-fucosyllactose; (2) 3-fucosyllactose; (3) lacto-N-tetraose, (4) lacto-N-neotetraose; (5) lacto-N-fucopentaose 1; (6) lacto-N-fucopentaose 2; (7) lacto-N-sialyltetraose b, (8) lacto-N-sialyltetraose c; (9) lacto-N-difucohexaose; (10) disialyllacto-N-tetraose; (11) fucosyllacto-N-hexaose. † Unidentified peak.

Next, we assessed whether HMO can be distinguished from other exogenous oligosaccharides present in rat milk or formula. Again, we used 3-d-old rats and separated them into four groups. One group of pups was not fasted and left with the dam until they were killed (DF). All other pups were separated from the dam and fasted for 12 h. One group was immediately killed after the fasting period. The remaining pups were orally administered with either FF or formula that contained HMO at 15 mg/ml (HMO pulse) and were killed 2 h later. All five intestinal segments in DF pups showed almost identical oligosaccharide profiles with a single prominent peak (Fig. 1(C)), which was identified as 3′SL based on HPLC standard retention time and MS analysis. 3′SL is the major oligosaccharide in rat milk(Reference Urashima, Saito and Nakamura30). Accordingly, in fasting pups 3′SL was almost absent from the first four intestinal segments (Fig. 1(D)), but still present in the fifth and most distal segment (Fig. 1(E)). These results show that the presence and composition of HMO along the intestine can be chased without interference by other dietary oligosaccharides as they are cleared from the first four intestinal segments during the 12 h fasting period prior to an HMO pulse. The fifth and most distal segment may, however, still contain some 3′SL from pre-fasting milk feeds.

FF contained hardly any oligosaccharides, which corresponds to the very low amount of complex oligosaccharides in bovine milk(Reference Tao, DePeters and Freeman31), the basis of the formula we used in the present study. As a consequence, only minor oligosaccharide peaks were detected in the intestinal segments of pups that received FF without the addition of HMO (Fig. 1(F)), indicating that the formula matrix itself does not contaminate the HMO pulse-chase experiments.

Oligosaccharide profiles from the intestinal segments of the pups that received HMO-containing formula (Figs. 1(A) and (B), Fig. 2) were entirely different from pups that were DF, fasted or received formula without HMO. Intestinal oligosaccharide profiles of HMO-fed pups partially resembled the profile of the pooled HMO that were initially added to the orally administered formula. Interestingly, LNFP1 was the main oligosaccharide in the intestinal samples (Fig. 2(D)), but not in the original HMO-containing formula (Fig. 2(A)), suggesting that the HMO composition changes in the intestine.

Fig. 2 Human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) composition changes over time and between intestinal segments. HPLC analysis shows that (A) 2′-fucosyllactose (2′FL, peak 1) is the major oligosaccharide in formula that is supplemented with HMO. The pie chart shows the relative abundance of 2′FL and (B) ten other HMO in the supplemented formula that was orally administered to 3-d-old pups. (C) The structural variety of six of these oligosaccharides is illustrated (●, glucose; , galactose; ■, N-acetyllactosamine; , fucose). (D) Representative HPLC analysis shows that the oligosaccharide composition in the third intestinal segment changes 2, 4 and 8 h after the rats are orally administered with HMO-containing formula. (E) The relative abundance of eleven oligosaccharides differs between the five different intestinal segments (left to right: proximal to distal) and over time (top to bottom) (n 3 pups for each time point). Peaks are annotated as follows: (1) 2′FL; (2) 3-fucosyllactose (3FL); (3) lacto-N-tetraose (LNT), (4) lacto-N-neotetraose (LNnT); (5) lacto-N-fucopentaose 1 (LNFP1); (6) lacto-N-fucopentaose 2 (LNFP2); (7) lacto-N-sialyltetraose b, (8) lacto-N-sialyltetraose c; (9) lacto-N-difucohexaose; (10) disialyllacto-N-tetraose; (11) fucosyllacto-N-hexaose. * 3′-Sialyllactose; † unidentified peak.

In an additional set of experiments, we administered one group of pups with formula that contained HMO and then labelled the oligosaccharides with 2AB after isolation and purification from the intestinal segments, as described earlier (post-labelling). In parallel, another group of pups was administered with formula that contained HMO that were already labelled with 2AB (pre-labelling). After isolation and purification from the intestinal segments, oligosaccharides were directly subjected to HPLC with fluorescence detection without additional 2AB-labelling. This way, only glycans comprising the reducing end of the administered HMO are detected, omitting possible non-reducing end HMO metabolites and endogenous oligosaccharides. HPLC profiles in the pre-labelled group were almost identical to those in the post-labelled group (Supplementary Figs. S2 and S3, available online). Again, LNFP 1 was the major oligosaccharide in the intestinal segments, but not in the originally administered HMO-containing formula, confirming our previous results.

Human milk oligosaccharide composition changes over time and between intestinal segments

Already during method development and validation, we observed that the HMO compositions in the intestinal segments differed from the orally administered HMO. In the following studies, we aimed to identify when and where these changes occur. Following a 12 h fasting period, we orally administered 3-d-old pups with either FF or formula that contained HMO at 15 mg/ml (pulse, Fig. 2(A)–(C)) and then killed the animals 2, 4 or 8 h after the feed (chase). Fig. 2(D) shows how the HMO composition changes over time in the third intestinal segment, which contained some of the mid and distal jejunum, but not the colon. Subtle changes were apparent as early as 2 h after the feeding. After 8 h, low-molecular HMO like 2′FL or lacto-N-tetraose were almost gone, while higher-molecular HMO, like LNFP1, became the most dominant HMO. To rule out that retention times of unknown metabolites coincided with those of HMO standards, the identity of all major peaks was confirmed by MS.

We calculated the relative abundance of all major HMO in the different intestinal segments and at different time points (Table 1 and Fig. 2(E)), but excluded 3′SL as some of it was carried over from pre-fasting milk feeds. As expected, at 2 h after feeding, oligosaccharide profiles of the most distal intestinal sections did not resemble HMO, but rat milk with its characteristic 3′SL peak, and the data were omitted from the analysis. Most intriguingly and against previous beliefs, changes in the oligosaccharide profiles already occurred in the third intestinal segment, which represents mostly the distal jejunum, but not the colon. The relative abundance of 2′FL decreased from the orally administered 36·5 to 19·3 (sd 11·4) and 8·4 (sd 6·9) % after 4 and 8 h, respectively. Lacto-N-tetraose dropped from the original 19·1 to 3·7 (sd 1·4) % at 4 h and to 3·9 (sd 2·2) % at 8 h. Its structural isomer lacto-N-neotetraose dropped from 3·7 to 1·2 (sd 0·4) % at 4 h and to 0·8 (sd 0·4) % at 8 h. In contrast, the relative abundance of the fucosylated HMO LNFP1 increased from 17·9 to 50·4 (sd 7·9) % at 4 h and to 63·9 (sd 10·5) % at 8 h. Its isomer LNFP2 also increased over time. The relative abundance of the sialylated HMO lacto-N-sialyltetraose b increased from 3·9 % in the HMO-containing formula to 8·2 (sd 2·1) % at 4 h and to 6·4 (sd 0·7) % at 8 h. Its isomer lacto-N-sialyltetraose c, however, dropped from 5·7 % in the formula to 0·5 (sd 0·3) % at 4 h and to 0·7 (sd 0·6) % at 8 h. We did not observe any significant changes in the relative abundance of disialyllacto-N-tetraose or fucosyllacto-N-hexaose between different intestinal segments or within the same segment at different time points.

Table 1 Relative abundance of selected oligosaccharides in human milk oligosaccharide (HMO)-containing formula and in the five different intestinal segments (I to V, proximal to distal) at 2, 4 and 8 h after feeding (n 3 rats per time point) (Mean values with their standard errors)

2′FL, 2′-fucosyllactose; 3FL, 3-fucosyllactose; LNT, lacto-N-tetraose; LNnT, lacto-N-neotetraose; LNFP1, lacto-N-fucopentaose 1; LNFP2, lacto-N-fucopentaose 2; LSTb, lacto-N-sialyltetraose b; LSTc, lacto-N-sialyltetraose c; LNDFH, lacto-N-difuco-hexaose; DSLNT, disialyllacto-N-tetraose; FLNH, fucosyllacto-N-hexaose.

It is noteworthy to mention that some of the compositional changes occurred already in the more proximal second segment. The relative abundance of 2′FL decreased from the initial 36·5 to 5·8 (sd 4·5) % at 8 h. Lacto-N-tetraose decreased from 19·1 to 2·8 (sd 1·4) % and lacto-N-neotetraose dropped from 3·7 to 0·7 (sd 0·5) %. At the same time, LNFP1 increased from 17·9 to 65·9 (sd 8·8) %. While lacto-N-sialyltetraose b increased from 3·9 to 6·7 (sd 2·1) %, its structural isomer lacto-N-sialyltetraose c decreased from 5·7 to 0·8 (sd 0·2) % in the very same second segment and within the same time frame.

Rat serum and urine contains 3′-sialyllactose, but hardly any other human milk oligosaccharides

Studies on human infants have shown that HMO are partially absorbed and excreted with the urine(Reference Rudloff, Obermeier and Borsch25, Reference Rudloff, Pohlentz and Borsch26). Thus, we examined whether the same applies for rat pups. Indeed, we detected a prominent 3′SL peak in both the serum and urine of DF pups (Fig. 3(A) and (B)). In pups that had fasted for 12 h, 3′SL was almost absent from the serum (Fig. 3(C)), but still present in the urine (Fig. 3(D)), although at lower concentrations than in the DF pups. When we administered the fasted pups with HMO-containing formula, 3′SL appeared in 1 h post-feeding serum, reached maximum levels between 4 and 6 h and was still detectable after 8 h (Fig. 3(E)). 3′SL also appeared in the 8 h urine sample (Fig. 3(F)).

Fig. 3 Rat serum and urine contains 3′-sialyllactose (3′SL), but hardly any other human milk oligosaccharides (HMO). Representative HPLC chromatograms show that 3′SL (*) appears in the (A) serum and (B) urine of dam-fed rats. (C) 3′SL disappears from the rat serum after a 12 h fasting period, (D) but is still present in urine. (E) Serum and (F) urine that were collected of rats 8 h after they received HMO-containing formula also contained 3′SL, but hardly any other oligosaccharides. The urine samples contained small amounts of 2′-fucosyllactose (2′FL, peak 1) and lacto-N-fucopentaose 1 (LNFP1, peak 5). (G) The presence of 3′SL in urine was confirmed by neuraminidase digestion. The 3′SL peak in the mock-treated sample (left) disappeared in the neuraminidase-treated sample (right). (H) The presence of 2′FL and LNFP1 in urine was confirmed by fucosidase digestion. The 2′FL and LNFP1 peaks in the mock-treated sample (left) disappeared after fucosidase treatment (right). † Unidentified peak.

While 3′SL was not the most abundant oligosaccharide in the HMO-containing formula (Fig. 2(A)), the serum and urine of HMO-fed pups almost exclusively contained 3′SL (Fig. 3(E) and (F)). We used MS (data not shown) as well as HPLC following neuraminidase digestion (Fig. 3(G)) and confirmed that the observed peak indeed represented 3′SL. Minor peaks appeared in the urine of HMO-fed pups (Fig. 3(F)) that were absent from the urine of pups that were DF, fasted or received formula without HMO. Standard retention times suggested that these peaks represented 2′FL and LNFP1, which we confirmed by MS as well as HPLC after fucosidase digestion (Fig. 3(H)). The dominance of 3′SL over other HMO in the serum and the urine of HMO-fed pups indicates an absorption mechanism that is specific for 3′SL.

Galacto-oligosaccharides are selectively digested in the small intestine and do not appear in the urine

GOS are added to some infant formula to mimic some of the benefits of HMO and, like HMO, are considered to be indigestible in the small intestine. When we administered fasted pups with GOS-containing formula at 8 mg/ml (Fig. 4(A)), GOS composition changed within the first 2 h and already in the third intestinal segment (Fig. 4(B)). After 4 h, different di- and trisaccharide peaks disappeared from the HPLC profile (Fig. 4(C)). After 8 h, disaccharides were almost absent and some of the tri- and tetrasaccharides had also disappeared, while others were still present (Fig. 4(D)). These results indicate a selective degradation of certain GOS while others remain intact.

Fig. 4 Galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) are selectively digested in the small intestine and do not appear in the urine. HPLC chromatograms of oligosaccharides in formula that was supplemented with (A) GOS and in the third intestinal segment (B) 2 h, (C) 4 h and (D) 8 h after rats were administered with the GOS-containing formula. HPLC chromatograms of oligosaccharides in the urine of pups that received either (E) GOS-supplemented formula or (F) formula alone. GOS peaks are marked with small letters for easier comparison between the different chromatograms, but exact structural composition represented by each peak is not known. GOS disaccharides elute before 40 min, trisaccharides elute between 40 and 60 min, tetrasaccharides elute between 60 and 80 min and oligosaccharides with five or more monomers elute after 80 min. * 3′-Sialyllactose.

Oligosaccharide profiles in 6 and 8 h urine from GOS-fed rats contained a dominant 3′SL peak (Fig. 4(E)) and closely resembled urine samples from pups that received FF without GOS (Fig. 4(F)). These results indicate that GOS are not excreted with the urine.

Discussion

HMO and GOS were previously considered to be indigestible in the small intestine and to reach the colon and other target organs in the same composition as originally secreted with the mother's milk. The present results now show that this assumption may be incorrect – at least for neonatal rats.

Changes in the composition of HMO occur as early as 2 h post-feeding and already within the second and third intestinal segment (Fig. 2 and Table 1). Due to the small size of 3-d-old rat pups, we were unable to separate their intestines by anatomical distinction as duodenum, jejunum, ileum or colon. Instead, we separated the intestines in five equal-length segments, with the second and third segments mostly spanning the jejunum, but not the colon. We therefore conclude that the composition of HMO and GOS already changes before they reach the colon.

Studies in tissue culture models suggest that HMO are anti-adhesive antimicrobials that serve as soluble decoy receptors and prevent the attachment of potential pathogens to the infant's intestinal epithelial surfaces, which is often an essential step for pathogens to cause disease(Reference Kunz, Rudloff and Baier3). In addition, HMO modulate proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis, as well as surface glycosylation in intestinal epithelial cells(Reference Kuntz, Kunz and Rudloff5, Reference Kuntz, Rudloff and Kunz6, Reference Angeloni, Ridet and Kusy32). These in vitro studies apply HMO to the cultured intestinal epithelial cells in the same composition as originally secreted with the mother's milk. The present results suggest that some of the in vitro-active HMO may, in fact, never reach the intestinal epithelium in the distal small intestine and colon in vivo.

The compositional changes are structure-specific as the relative abundance of the α1-2-fucosylated trisaccharides 2′FL decreases, but that of the α1-2-fucosylated pentasaccharide LNFP1 increases (Fig. 2 and Table 1). The same is true for sialylated HMO as the relative abundance of lacto-N-sialyltetraose b significantly increases and that of its isomer lacto-N-sialyltetraose c significantly decreases throughout the intestinal passage and over time. While we cannot annotate each individual GOS isomer in the HPLC chromatograms, it is clear that some GOS structures disappear and others resist degradation (Fig. 4). GOS are a heterogeneous group of oligosaccharides with different glycosidic linkages between the Gal monomers, and it is likely that some linkages can be cleaved during the intestinal passage while others resist. Due to the lack of an inert internal oligosaccharide reference standard, we cannot provide absolute HMO or GOS concentrations for each of the intestinal segments and time points, but it is evident from the present results that HMO and GOS undergo dramatic compositional changes. It remains, however, unknown whether these changes are caused by endogenous intestinal enzymes or by microbial enzymes. Studies in gnotobiotic animals may be able to answer this question.

The major challenge of the present study lies in the rat model itself. Differences in intestine anatomy, physiology and biochemistry between rats and human subjects make it difficult to predict whether the present results in rat pups translate to human neonates(Reference Kararli33). The most important difference in this particular context may be the microbial colonisation in proximal parts of the gastrointestinal tract. The amount of bacteria in the proximal small intestine and even in the stomach is several orders of magnitudes higher in rats than it is in human subjects(Reference Kararli33). In addition, the composition of intestinal bacterial communities is probably going to differ between laboratory rats and human neonates, which at least partially determines when, where and to what extent dietary oligosaccharides are metabolised.

The present results raise two fundamental questions: (1) are rats and other laboratory animals like mice or piglets suitable models to study the effects of HMO? and (2) are HMO indigestible in the small intestine of human neonates and do they reach the colon in the same composition as in mother's milk as originally assumed or do the present results translate – at least in part – from rats to human subjects and the HMO composition changes before reaching the colon? HMO resist a low pH as well as degradation through enzymes from the pancreas and brush-border membranes(Reference Engfer, Stahl and Finke15, Reference Gnoth, Kunz and Kinne-Saffran16), resembling some of the conditions in the infant's stomach and small intestine. The data, however, stem from in vitro incubation studies. There are currently no in vivo data on HMO composition in the small intestine of human infants. At the same time, recent studies show that the oligosaccharide composition in the faeces of breast-fed infants is different from that in the mother's milk(Reference Albrecht, Schols and van den Heuvel21Reference Albrecht, Schols and van Zoeren23). It remains unknown when, where and how these changes occur between the time of ingestion and the time of excretion.

Another striking observation in the present study is the selective absorption and urinary excretion of 3′SL. Human milk contains a variety of different oligosaccharides and so does the urine of breast-fed infants(Reference Rudloff, Obermeier and Borsch25, Reference Rudloff, Pohlentz and Borsch26, Reference Rudloff, Pohlentz and Diekmann34). Rat milk, however, contains mostly 3′SL(Reference Urashima, Saito and Nakamura30) and it appears that rat pups selectively absorb 3′SL even if high amounts of other oligosaccharides (HMO or GOS) are administered with the diet (Fig. 3). These results speak against the use of rats in studies that aim to investigate the effects of HMO in extra-intestinal target organs and tissues. Whether HMO absorption and urinary excretion in other animal models, like mice or piglets, more closely resemble those in human neonates needs to be further investigated.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512005727

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Caroline Nissan for her technical assistance with HMO purification and analysis. This project has been funded in part by the National Institutes of Health grant K99/R00 DK078668 (L. B.). E. J.-K., C. M. and L. B. have no conflicts of interest to declare. Authors' contributions were as follows: L. B. and E. J.-K. designed research; E. J.-K. and C. M. conducted research; E. J.-K and L. B. analysed data; E. J.-K and L. B. wrote the paper. L. B. had the primary responsibility for the final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

1Bode, L (2006) Recent advances on structure, metabolism, and function of human milk oligosaccharides. J Nutr 136, 21272130.Google Scholar
2Bode, L (2009) Human milk oligosaccharides: prebiotics and beyond. Nutr Rev 67, Suppl. 2, S183S191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Kunz, C, Rudloff, S, Baier, W, et al. (2000) Oligosaccharides in human milk: structural, functional, and metabolic aspects. Annu Rev Nutr 20, 699722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Newburg, DS, Ruiz-Palacios, GM & Morrow, AL (2005) Human milk glycans protect infants against enteric pathogens. Annu Rev Nutr 25, 3758.Google Scholar
5Kuntz, S, Kunz, C & Rudloff, S (2009) Oligosaccharides from human milk induce growth arrest via G2/M by influencing growth-related cell cycle genes in intestinal epithelial cells. Br J Nutr 101, 13061315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Kuntz, S, Rudloff, S & Kunz, C (2008) Oligosaccharides from human milk influence growth-related characteristics of intestinally transformed and non-transformed intestinal cells. Br J Nutr 99, 462471.Google Scholar
7Wang, B (2009) Sialic acid is an essential nutrient for brain development and cognition. Annu Rev Nutr 29, 177222.Google Scholar
8Jantscher-Krenn, E, Zherebtsov, M, Nissan, C, et al. (2012) The human milk oligosaccharide disialyllacto-N-tetraose prevents necrotising enterocolitis in neonatal rats. Gut 61, 14171425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Kobata, A (2010) Structures and application of oligosaccharides in human milk. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 86, 731747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Bode, L, Kunz, C, Muhly-Reinholz, M, et al. (2004) Inhibition of monocyte, lymphocyte, and neutrophil adhesion to endothelial cells by human milk oligosaccharides. Thromb Haemost 92, 14021410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Bode, L, Rudloff, S, Kunz, C, et al. (2004) Human milk oligosaccharides reduce platelet–neutrophil complex formation leading to a decrease in neutrophil beta 2 integrin expression. J Leukoc Biol 76, 820826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Jantscher-Krenn, E, Lauwaet, T, Bliss, LA, et al. (2012) Human milk oligosaccharides reduce Entamoeba histolytica attachment and cytotoxicity in vitro. Br J Nutr 108, 18391846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Morrow, AL, Ruiz-Palacios, GM, Altaye, M, et al. (2004) Human milk oligosaccharides are associated with protection against diarrhea in breast-fed infants. J Pediatr 145, 297303.Google Scholar
14Ruiz-Palacios, GM, Cervantes, LE, Ramos, P, et al. (2003) Campylobacter jejuni binds intestinal H(O) antigen (Fuc alpha 1, 2Gal beta 1, 4GlcNAc), and fucosyloligosaccharides of human milk inhibit its binding and infection. J Biol Chem 278, 1411214120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Engfer, MB, Stahl, B, Finke, B, et al. (2000) Human milk oligosaccharides are resistant to enzymatic hydrolysis in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Am J Clin Nutr 71, 15891596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Gnoth, MJ, Kunz, C, Kinne-Saffran, E, et al. (2000) Human milk oligosaccharides are minimally digested in vitro. J Nutr 130, 30143020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Asakuma, S, Hatakeyama, E, Urashima, T, et al. (2011) Physiology of consumption of human milk oligosaccharides by infant gut-associated bifidobacteria. J Biol Chem 286, 3458334592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18LoCascio, RG, Ninonuevo, MR, Freeman, SL, et al. (2007) Glycoprofiling of bifidobacterial consumption of human milk oligosaccharides demonstrates strain specific, preferential consumption of small chain glycans secreted in early human lactation. J Agric Food Chem 55, 89148919.Google Scholar
19Marcobal, A, Barboza, M, Froehlich, JW, et al. (2010) Consumption of human milk oligosaccharides by gut-related microbes. J Agric Food Chem 58, 53345340.Google Scholar
20Marcobal, A, Barboza, M, Sonnenburg, ED, et al. (2011) Bacteroides in the infant gut consume milk oligosaccharides via mucus-utilization pathways. Cell Host Microbe 10, 507514.Google Scholar
21Albrecht, S, Schols, HA, van den Heuvel, EG, et al. (2010) CE-LIF-MS n profiling of oligosaccharides in human milk and feces of breast-fed babies. Electrophoresis 31, 12641273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Albrecht, S, Schols, HA, van den Heuvel, EG, et al. (2011) Occurrence of oligosaccharides in feces of breast-fed babies in their first six months of life and the corresponding breast milk. Carbohydr Res 346, 25402550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Albrecht, S, Schols, HA, van Zoeren, D, et al. (2011) Oligosaccharides in feces of breast- and formula-fed babies. Carbohydr Res 346, 21732181.Google Scholar
24Gnoth, MJ, Rudloff, S, Kunz, C, et al. (2001) Investigations of the in vitro transport of human milk oligosaccharides by a Caco-2 monolayer using a novel high performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry technique. J Biol Chem 276, 3436334370.Google Scholar
25Rudloff, S, Obermeier, S, Borsch, C, et al. (2006) Incorporation of orally applied (13)C-galactose into milk lactose and oligosaccharides. Glycobiology 16, 477487.Google Scholar
26Rudloff, S, Pohlentz, G, Borsch, C, et al. (2012) Urinary excretion of in vivo 13C-labelled milk oligosaccharides in breastfed infants. Br J Nutr 107, 957963.Google Scholar
27Fuhrer, A, Sprenger, N, Kurakevich, E, et al. (2010) Milk sialyllactose influences colitis in mice through selective intestinal bacterial colonization. J Exp Med 207, 28432854.Google Scholar
28German, JB, Freeman, SL, Lebrilla, CB, et al. (2008) Human milk oligosaccharides: evolution, structures and bioselectivity as substrates for intestinal bacteria. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program 62, 205218, discussion 218–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Barlow, B & Santulli, TV (1975) Importance of multiple episodes of hypoxia or cold stress on the development of enterocolitis in an animal model. Surgery 77, 687690.Google Scholar
30Urashima, T, Saito, T, Nakamura, T, et al. (2001) Oligosaccharides of milk and colostrum in non-human mammals. Glycoconj J 18, 357371.Google Scholar
31Tao, N, DePeters, EJ, Freeman, S, et al. (2008) Bovine milk glycome. J Dairy Sci 91, 37683778.Google Scholar
32Angeloni, S, Ridet, JL, Kusy, N, et al. (2005) Glycoprofiling with micro-arrays of glycoconjugates and lectins. Glycobiology 15, 3141.Google Scholar
33Kararli, TT (1995) Comparison of the gastrointestinal anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry of humans and commonly used laboratory animals. Biopharm Drug Dispos 16, 351380.Google Scholar
34Rudloff, S, Pohlentz, G, Diekmann, L, et al. (1996) Urinary excretion of lactose and oligosaccharides in preterm infants fed human milk or infant formula. Acta Paediatr 85, 598603.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) can be detected in rat intestines without interference from other dietary or endogenous oligosaccharides and without degradation during sample processing. Representative HPLC chromatograms of oligosaccharides isolated from intestinal segments. Oligosaccharide composition in the third intestinal segment is not different whether (A) luminal aspirates alone or (B) entire tissue lysates are analysed (Supplementary Fig. S1 (available online) shows representative chromatograms from other intestinal sections). (C) 3′-Sialyllactose (*) is the major oligosaccharide in the intestines of dam-fed pups, (D) almost absent from the first four segments of fasted pups, (E) but still present in the fifth and most distal intestinal segment in fasted pups. (F) HMO are not present in the intestines of pups that received formula alone, without the addition of HMO. Peaks are annotated as follows: (1) 2′-fucosyllactose; (2) 3-fucosyllactose; (3) lacto-N-tetraose, (4) lacto-N-neotetraose; (5) lacto-N-fucopentaose 1; (6) lacto-N-fucopentaose 2; (7) lacto-N-sialyltetraose b, (8) lacto-N-sialyltetraose c; (9) lacto-N-difucohexaose; (10) disialyllacto-N-tetraose; (11) fucosyllacto-N-hexaose. † Unidentified peak.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) composition changes over time and between intestinal segments. HPLC analysis shows that (A) 2′-fucosyllactose (2′FL, peak 1) is the major oligosaccharide in formula that is supplemented with HMO. The pie chart shows the relative abundance of 2′FL and (B) ten other HMO in the supplemented formula that was orally administered to 3-d-old pups. (C) The structural variety of six of these oligosaccharides is illustrated (●, glucose; , galactose; ■, N-acetyllactosamine; , fucose). (D) Representative HPLC analysis shows that the oligosaccharide composition in the third intestinal segment changes 2, 4 and 8 h after the rats are orally administered with HMO-containing formula. (E) The relative abundance of eleven oligosaccharides differs between the five different intestinal segments (left to right: proximal to distal) and over time (top to bottom) (n 3 pups for each time point). Peaks are annotated as follows: (1) 2′FL; (2) 3-fucosyllactose (3FL); (3) lacto-N-tetraose (LNT), (4) lacto-N-neotetraose (LNnT); (5) lacto-N-fucopentaose 1 (LNFP1); (6) lacto-N-fucopentaose 2 (LNFP2); (7) lacto-N-sialyltetraose b, (8) lacto-N-sialyltetraose c; (9) lacto-N-difucohexaose; (10) disialyllacto-N-tetraose; (11) fucosyllacto-N-hexaose. * 3′-Sialyllactose; † unidentified peak.

Figure 2

Table 1 Relative abundance of selected oligosaccharides in human milk oligosaccharide (HMO)-containing formula and in the five different intestinal segments (I to V, proximal to distal) at 2, 4 and 8 h after feeding (n 3 rats per time point) (Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Rat serum and urine contains 3′-sialyllactose (3′SL), but hardly any other human milk oligosaccharides (HMO). Representative HPLC chromatograms show that 3′SL (*) appears in the (A) serum and (B) urine of dam-fed rats. (C) 3′SL disappears from the rat serum after a 12 h fasting period, (D) but is still present in urine. (E) Serum and (F) urine that were collected of rats 8 h after they received HMO-containing formula also contained 3′SL, but hardly any other oligosaccharides. The urine samples contained small amounts of 2′-fucosyllactose (2′FL, peak 1) and lacto-N-fucopentaose 1 (LNFP1, peak 5). (G) The presence of 3′SL in urine was confirmed by neuraminidase digestion. The 3′SL peak in the mock-treated sample (left) disappeared in the neuraminidase-treated sample (right). (H) The presence of 2′FL and LNFP1 in urine was confirmed by fucosidase digestion. The 2′FL and LNFP1 peaks in the mock-treated sample (left) disappeared after fucosidase treatment (right). † Unidentified peak.

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) are selectively digested in the small intestine and do not appear in the urine. HPLC chromatograms of oligosaccharides in formula that was supplemented with (A) GOS and in the third intestinal segment (B) 2 h, (C) 4 h and (D) 8 h after rats were administered with the GOS-containing formula. HPLC chromatograms of oligosaccharides in the urine of pups that received either (E) GOS-supplemented formula or (F) formula alone. GOS peaks are marked with small letters for easier comparison between the different chromatograms, but exact structural composition represented by each peak is not known. GOS disaccharides elute before 40 min, trisaccharides elute between 40 and 60 min, tetrasaccharides elute between 60 and 80 min and oligosaccharides with five or more monomers elute after 80 min. * 3′-Sialyllactose.

Supplementary material: Image

Jantscher-Krenn Supplementary Material

Representative HPLC chromatograms of oligosaccharides isolated from intestinal segments I, II and IV. Oligosaccharide composition in the different segments is not different whether luminal aspirates (A, C, E) or entire tissue lysates are analysed (B, D, F). Peaks are annotated as follows: 1. 2’-fucosyllactose (2’FL); 2. 3-fucosyllactose (3FL); 3. Lacto-N-tetraose (LNT), 4. Lacto-N-neotetraose; 5. Lacto-N-fucopentaose 1 (LNFP1); 6. Lacto-N-fucopentaose 2 (LNFP2); 7. Lacto-N-sialyltetraose b (LSTb), 8. Lacto-N-sialyltetraose c (LSTc); 9, Lacto-N-difucohexaose (LNDFH); 10. Disialyllacto-N-tetraose (DSLNT); 11. Fucosyllacto-N-hexaose (FLNH); * 3’-sialyllactose (3’SL); #unidentified peak

Download Jantscher-Krenn Supplementary Material(Image)
Image 18.8 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Jantscher-Krenn Supplementary Material

Representative HPLC chromatograms of oligosaccharides recovered from intestinal tissue segments 2 h after oral gavage. HMO were either pre-labelled with 2AB prior to administration (A, C, E, G) or labelled after tissue collection (B, D, F, H). Comparison of pre-labelled and post-labelled chromatograms allow discrimination of administered HMO from endogenous glycans. Pre- and post-labelled HMO profiles are very similar in all intestinal segments, with peak 5 increasing in relative abundance towards distal segments. Peaks are annotated as follows: 1. 2’-fucosyllactose (2’FL); 2. 3-fucosyllactose (3FL); 3. Lacto-N-tetraose (LNT), 4. Lacto-N-neotetraose; 5. Lacto-N-fucopentaose 1 (LNFP1); 6. Lacto-N-fucopentaose 2 (LNFP2); 7. Lacto-N-sialyltetraose b (LSTb), 8. Lacto-N-sialyltetraose c (LSTc); 9, Lacto-N-difucohexaose (LNDFH); 10. Disialyllacto-N-tetraose (DSLNT); 11. Fucosyllacto-N-hexaose (FLNH); * 3’-sialyllactose (3’SL); #unidentified peak

Download Jantscher-Krenn Supplementary Material(Image)
Image 20.4 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Jantscher-Krenn Supplementary Material

Representative HPLC chromatograms of oligosaccharides recovered from intestinal tissue segments 4 h after oral gavage. HMO were either pre-labelled with 2AB prior to administration (A, C, E, G, I) or labelled after tissue collection (B, D, F, H, J). Comparison of pre-labelled and post-labelled chromatograms allow discrimination of administered HMO from endogenous glycans. Pre- and post-labelled HMO profiles are very similar in all intestinal segments, with peak 5 increasing in relative abundance towards distal segments. Peaks are annotated as follows: 1. 2’-fucosyllactose (2’FL); 2. 3-fucosyllactose (3FL); 3. Lacto-N-tetraose (LNT), 4. Lacto-N-neotetraose; 5. Lacto-N-fucopentaose 1 (LNFP1); 6. Lacto-N-fucopentaose 2 (LNFP2); 7. Lacto-N-sialyltetraose b (LSTb), 8. Lacto-N-sialyltetraose c (LSTc); 9, Lacto-N-difucohexaose (LNDFH); 10. Disialyllacto-N-tetraose (DSLNT); 11. Fucosyllacto-N-hexaose (FLNH); * 3’-sialyllactose (3’SL); #unidentified peak

Download Jantscher-Krenn Supplementary Material(Image)
Image 25.1 MB