Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T23:18:09.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genistein protects against polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-induced oxidative DNA damage in non-cancerous breast cells MCF-10A

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2008

Hau Y. Leung
Affiliation:
Food and Nutritional Sciences Programme, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong
Lai Hang Yung
Affiliation:
Molecular Biotechnology Programme, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong
Ching Ho Poon
Affiliation:
Molecular Biotechnology Programme, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong
Guoli Shi
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Greenebaum Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD21201, USA
A.-Lien Lu
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Greenebaum Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD21201, USA
Lai K. Leung*
Affiliation:
Food and Nutritional Sciences Programme, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong Department of Biochemistry, Room 507C, MMW Building, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Lai K. Leung, fax +852 26037732, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) are established cancer initiators that can be found in our food and environment. Some dietary phytochemicals are strong inhibitors of PAH-induced mutagenesis. The soya isoflavone genistein has been shown previously in our laboratory to be an inhibitor of PAH metabolite binding to DNA. In the present study, we investigated the effect of genistein on oxidative DNA damage induced by PAH in the non-tumorigenic breast cell line MCF10A. 7,12-Dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene (DMBA) can induce expressions of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 which are known to be responsive to PAH. These enzymes, in turn, will metabolise the PAH into their ultimate carcinogenic forms. Genistein can significantly suppress the expressions within 5 μm. The comet assay indicated that DMBA introduced DNA damage to these cells, and co-treatment with genistein at 5 or 10 μm could alleviate the damage. In addition to the chelation of DMBA metabolites to DNA, flow cytometry results revealed that oxidation was also a factor of DNA damage. The oxidative DNA damage could be removed by co-treating with 10 μm-genistein. Because no increased oxidative DNA repair was observed, suppression on the cytochrome enzymes appeared to be the underlying mechanism.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) are commonly found in our environment, and they can be isolated from diesel exhaust, barbequed meat, tobacco smoke, overheated cooking oil, etc(1). PAH are metabolised and transformed into DNA-attacking electrophiles in the body. The significance of these environmental toxicants in breast cancer can be inferred from the increased presence of PAH–DNA adducts in human breast tumours(Reference Li, Wang, Dhingra and Hittelman2).

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1 and CYP1B1 enzymes are responsible for the biotransformation of procarcinogens to genotoxic moieties PAH(Reference Dertinger, Lantum, Silverstone and Gasiewicz3, Reference Safe4). The importance of these CYP1 enzymes in PAH-induced carcinogenesis is implicated in two gene-knockout mouse results; benzo[a]pyrene cannot induce CYP1A1 or cancer in aryl hydrocarbon receptor-null mice(Reference Shimizu, Nakatsuru, Ichinose, Takahashi, Kume, Mimura, Fujii-Kuriyama and Ishikawa5), and lower cancer incidence was observed in 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-treated CYP1B1 knockout mice(Reference Buters, Sakai, Richter, Pineau, Alexander, Savas, Doehmer, Ward, Jefcoate and Gonzalez6).

The significance of the family of CYP1 enzymes in human breast cancer is not clear. Both tumour and normal tissues of the breast express CYP1A1 and CYP1B1(Reference Spink, Fasco, Gierthy and Spink7Reference Iscan, Klaavuniemi, Coban, Kapucuoglu, Pelkonen and Raunio9). The inhibition of CYP1 enzymes appears to be beneficial in the prevention of DMBA–DNA adduct formation in vivo (Reference MacDonald, Ciolino and Yeh10) and in vitro (Reference Kleiner, Vulimiri, Reed, Uberecken and DiGiovanni11). Polymorphisms with higher activity of CYP1A1 appear to be a risk factor for breast cancer in African-Americans(Reference Taioli12); so are the polymorphisms of CYP1B1 in Asian women(Reference Zheng, Xie, Jin, Cheng, Dai, Wen, Shu and Gao13).

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in women. Asian countries have lower breast cancer incidences than the West; however, no difference in breast cancer incidence is found between Asian descendents and other women in America(Reference Ziegler, Hoover and Pike14). These observations suggest that environment may play a part in the aetiology of breast cancer, and soya consumption has been one of the major leads of investigation.

Because MCF-10A cells are non-tumorigenic, they are a better model than MCF-7 cells for chemopreventive study. In the present study, the effect of genistein on oxidative DNA damage induced by DMBA was investigated in these non-cancerous cells. It was postulated that genistein could protect against PAH-induced DNA damage.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

3H-labelled 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene was obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech UK Limited (Buckinghamshire, UK). Other reagents, if not stated, were purchased from Sigma Chemicals (St Louis, MO, USA).

Cell culture

MCF-10A cells (American Tissue Culture Collection, Rockville, MD, USA) were routinely cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 media (Sigma Chemicals), supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Rockville, MD, USA) and antibiotics (50 U/ml penicillin, 50 μg/ml streptomycin), and incubated at 37°C and 5 % CO2. At 3 d before the experiment, the cultures were switched to RPMI-1640 phenol red-free media (Sigma Chemicals) and 5 % charcoal-dextran-treated fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA). Sub-confluent cell cultures were treated with DMBA and various concentrations of isoflavone with dimethylsulfoxide as the carrier solvent. The final concentration of the solvent was 0·1 % (v/v), and the control cultures received dimethylsulfoxide only.

Measurement of 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene–DNA adduct formation

The assay was performed as previously described(Reference Chan and Leung15) and was performed in a six-well plate. Into each well 5 × 105 cells were placed and allowed to attach for 24 h. Then they were treated with [3H]DMBA (0·1 μg/ml). After 16 h, cells were washed with cold PBS, trypsinised and pelleted. Cells were incubated on ice in nuclei-separating buffer (10 mm-2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-propane-1,3-diol (Tris)-HCl (pH 7·5), 320 mm-sucrose, 5 mm-magnesium chloride and 1 % Triton X-100) to separate the nuclei which were then separated from cell debris by centrifugation at 4000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The nuclei were lysed by 400 μl nuclei lysis buffer (1 % SDS in 0·5 m-Tris, 20 μm-EDTA and 10 mm-NaCl, pH 9) and then treated with 20 μl proteinase K (20 mg/ml) for 2 h at 48°C. After that the samples were cooled at room temperature and residual proteins were salted out by the addition of 150 μl saturated NaCl. The samples were then subjected to centrifugation at 10 000 g for 30 min at 4°C. Genomic DNA was isolated from the supernatant fraction by ethanol precipitation and re-dissolved in autoclaved distilled water. DNA samples having an optical density 260 nm:280 nm ratio larger than 1·9 are used for scintillation counting. Samples were mixed with 4 ml cocktail in a vial and were subjected to scintillation counting.

Comet assay

A CometAssay™ Kit was ordered from Trevigen (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Cells were placed in a six-well plate and allowed to attach for 24 h. After treatment of drugs, cells were washed with PBS, trypsinised and pelleted. The cell pellet was re-suspended in PBS. Cells at 2 × 105 cells/ml were combined with molten low-melting agarose at 42°C at 1:10. Of the above mixture, 75 μl was pipetted and spread onto a CometSlide. The slide was placed at 4°C in the dark for 30 min for better adherence and then immersed in pre-chilled lysis solution and kept at 4°C in the dark for 60 min. The slides were left in alkaline solution for 60 min at room temperature in the dark before electrophoresis. Alkaline electrophoresis was performed at 4°C in the dark. Alkaline solution was poured to just cover the samples. The electrophoresis was performed for 30 min at 25 V. The slides were rinsed with double-distilled water after electrophoresis and immersed in 70 % ethanol for 5 min. The slides were dried in air and then stained with 50 μl SYBR green. After staining, DNA samples are viewed by using a Nikon TE2000 microscope with relevant filters.

Quantitative real-time PCR

MCF-10A cells were seeded in a six-well plate for 1 d before treatment. The medium was removed, and cells were cultured in the presence of DMBA and genistein. After 24 h treatment, total RNA was extracted from the cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The concentration and purity of RNA were determined by absorbance at 260/280 nm. First, DNA strands were synthesised from 3 mg total RNA using oligo-dT primers and Moloney murine leukaemia virus RT (USB Corporation, Cleveland, OH, USA). Target fragments were quantified by real-time PCR, and a DNA Engine Opticon II (MJ Research, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was employed for this assay. Taqman/VIC minor groove binder probes and primers for CYP1A1, CYP1B1 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Assay-on-Demand™) and real-time PCR Taqman Universal PCR Master Mix were all obtained from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA). PCR reactions were set up as described in the protocol, which was validated by the manufacturer. Signals obtained for GAPDH were used as a reference housekeeping gene to normalise the amount of total RNA amplified in each reaction. Relative gene expression data were analysed using the 2− ΔΔCT method(Reference Livak and Schmittgen16).

Ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase activity in intact cells

The assay method was performed as previously described(Reference Ciolino and Yeh17). In brief, MCF-10A cells in ninety-six-well plates were treated with 2·5 μm-DMBA and various concentrations of phytochemicals. The medium was then removed and the cells were washed twice by 100 μl PBS. Ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activities, which are indicative of CYP1 enzyme activities, were then carried out. To each well was added 100 μl of 5 μm-ethoxyresorufin in PBS with 1·5 mm-salicyclamide, which was followed by incubation at 37°C for 15 min. The reaction was stopped by 100 μl of ice-cold methanol, and the resorufin generated was measured by a FLUOstar Galaxy microplate reader (BMG Labtechnologies Inc., Durham, NC, USA) with excitation of 544 nm and emission at 590 nm.

Oxidative DNA damage assay

A fluorometric OxyDNA Assay Kit was obtained from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA). MCF-10A cells were cultured in a six-well plate. After drug treatment, the cells were trypsinised, washed and suspended in Falcon culture tubes. The cells were fixed with 1 ml of 70 % ethanol and stored at 4°C overnight. After fixing, the cells were washed twice and re-suspended in blocking solution for 1 h at 37°C. The cells were then incubated in fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugate solution in the dark for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were collected and re-suspended in fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) fluid. The amount of oxidised DNA was then determined by FACSORT flow cytometry with a FITC filter, and 10 000 cells were enumerated for each run.

Preparation of oligonucleotide substrates

The 19-mer oligonucleotide substrates required for activity assays were synthesised and purified as previously described(Reference Lu, Yuen and Cillo18). The sequences are as follows:

  • Chang179, 5′-GCAGAAGGCOAATTCCTCG-3′;

  • Chang68C, 5′-CCGAGGAATTCGCCTTCTG-3′,

where O represents 8-oxo-guanine (8-oxoG) and the bases at the matched sites are underlined.

Heteroduplexes containing C/8-oxoG were constructed by annealing Chang68C with Chang179. One pmol of annealed duplexes was labelled at the 3′ or 5′ end as described by Lu(Reference Lu and Vaughan19) and Lu et al. (Reference Lu, Tsai-Wu and Cillo20). After being filled in with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I, the resulting blunt-end duplex DNA was 20 bp in length.

Assay of oxidative DNA repair activity

Oxidative DNA repair measured as C/8-oxoG-DNA glycosylase activity was performed according to Hazra et al. (Reference Hazra, Izumi, Maidt, Floyd and Mitra21). A 25 μl DNA binding reaction contained 20 μg protein, 25 mm-HEPES (pH 7·6), 50 mm-KCl, 2·5 mm-EDTA, 2 mm-dithiothreitol, 2·5 % glycerol and 3·6 fmol of C/8-oxoG-containing labelled DNA. The reactions were incubated at 37°C for 1 h, terminated by phenol–chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Samples were dissolved in 3 μl of sequencing dye. After being heated at 90°C for 3 min, samples were resolved on a 14 % polyacrylamide–8·3 m-urea sequencing gel and analysed by autoradiograph.

Statistical analysis

A Prism® 3.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) software package was utilised for statistical analysis. The results of the present study were compared by ANOVA and Bonferroni's method for multiple comparisons. The level of significance was set at P < 0·05.

Results

7,12-Dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene-induced cytochrome P450 1A1 and 1B1 mRNA expressions suppression by genistein

The expression of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 was induced by DMBA by about 116-fold and 6-fold respectively. At 1 μm, genistein significantly reduced DMBA-induced CYP1A1 expression by 60 % (Fig. 1), while 5 μm-genistein reduced DMBA-induced CYP1B1 expression by 30 % (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1 Effect of genistein on 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1 expression. MCF-10A cells were treated with 2·5 μm-DMBA and genistein and cultured for 24 h. mRNA expression of CYP1A1 was quantified by real-time PCR. Values are means (n 3), with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. One-way ANOVA revealed that means are significantly (P < 0·05) different, and a post hoc ranking test indicated that b>c>a.

Fig. 2 Effect of genistein on 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1B1 expression. MCF-10A cells were treated with 2·5 μm-DMBA and genistein and cultured for 24 h. mRNA expression of CYP1B1 was quantified by real-time PCR. Values are means (n 3), with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. One-way ANOVA revealed that means are significantly (P < 0·05) different, and a post hoc ranking test indicated that b>c>a.

Reduction of 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene-induced ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase activities by genistein

DMBA induced EROD activity by 3- or 4-fold. Figure 3 shows that 1 μm-genistein reduced DMBA-induced EROD activity by about 50 %. At 5 and 10 μm, genistein further reduced DMBA-induced EROD activity by about 65 and 75 % respectively.

Fig. 3 Ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activity in cells treated with genistein and 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene (DMBA). MCF-10A cells were seeded in ninety-six-well culture plates and treated with 2·5 μm-DMBA and genistein. After a 24 h treatment, the cells were assayed for EROD activity. Values are means (n 3), with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. One-way ANOVA revealed that means are significantly (P < 0·05) different, and a post hoc ranking test indicated that b>c>a.

Reduction of binding of 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene–DNA in MCF-10A cells by genistein

DMBA could intercalate DNA and causes DNA damage. Figure 4 shows that genistein could also reduce DMBA–DNA adduct in MCF-10A cells. At 1 and 5 μm, genistein could reduce DNA adduct formation by about 35 %, while 10 μm-genistein could reduce the formation by 45 %.

Fig. 4 Genistein decreased 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene (DMBA)–DNA binding. MCF-10A cells were seeded in six-well culture plates and treated with genistein and 3H-labelled DMBA. After a 24 h treatment, genomic DNA was extracted and the DMBA–DNA lesions were determined by scintillation counting. Values are means (n 3), with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. One-way ANOVA revealed that means are significantly (P < 0·05) different, and a post hoc ranking test indicated that a>b.

DNA strand break generated by 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene in MCF-10A cells moderated by genistein

Cells treated with DMBA or co-treated with 0·1 or 1 μm of the phytochemical showed comparable percentages of intact cells which were significantly lower than control (Fig. 5). The percentage of intact cells in DMBA co-treated with 5 or 10 μm-genistein was similar to control.

Fig. 5 Comet-forming activity in cells treated with 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene (DMBA) and genistein. MCF-10A cells were seeded in six-well culture plates and treated with 2·5 μm-DMBA and genistein. After a 72 h treatment, cells were disaggregated with trypsin/EDTA before incorporation into the comet assay as described in Materials and methods. Cells with a fragmented DNA tail were regarded as damaged cells while those which did not possess a tail were regarded as intact cells. Values are means (n 3), with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. One-way ANOVA revealed that means are significantly (P < 0·05) different, and a post hoc ranking test indicated that a>b.

Alleviation of 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene-induced oxidative DNA damage by genistein

Flow cytometry showed that a right shift of fluorescence occurred upon 2·5 μm-DMBA treatment (Fig. 6(A)). This result indicated that the treatment increased the amount of 8-oxoG in DNA. The co-treatment with 0·1 and 1 μm-genistein had little effect on the shifted fluorescence (Fig. 6(B) and (C)). However, 10 μm-genistein could bring the shifted florescence back to the control state (Fig. 6(D)). Moreover, various treatments in the study did not seem to affect the cell cycle.

Fig. 6 Oxidative DNA damage in 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene (DMBA) and genistein-co-treated MCF-10A cells. MCF-10A cells were seeded in six-well culture plates and treated with 2·5 μm-DMBA and genistein for 24 h (A). Cells were disaggregated with trypsin/EDTA, fixed and processed for flow cytometry. Control cells (—) with oxidised DNA conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) are shaded grey. The conjugated profile of cells treated with DMBA (…) shifted to the right. Concentrations of 0·1 (B), 1 (C) and 10 (D) μm-genistein (- - -) were co-adminstrated in the cultures. The geometric means of control, DMBA treatment, DMBA–0·1 μm-genistein co-treatment, DMBA–1 μm genistein co-treatment and DMBA–10 μm-genistein co-treatment are 69, 79, 82, 84 and 68 units of light intensity, respectively.

Effect of 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene and co-treatment with genistein on oxidative DNA repair

Glycosylase activity is crucial in repairing DNA damage. In the DMBA treatment group, there was no indication of increased activity in 8-oxoG glycosylase compared with control. In addition, administration of genistein at the dosages ranging from 0·1 to 10 μm did not elevate the repairing capacity (data not shown). Therefore, the reduced 8-oxoG in the co-treatment with genistein as shown above was not the result of increased repair capacity.

Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated that genistein could reduce oxidative DNA damage induced by DMBA. Although the system for repairing 8-oxoG was not induced, the suppression on CYP1 expressions might reduce the free radical generation and decrease the cellular oxidative stress.

Genistein has been a controversial figure in serving as a chemopreventive agent of the breast. It is well established that the phyto-oestrogen induces oestrogen receptor-positive breast cell proliferation. In addition, its metabolite, orobol or 5,7,3′,4′-tetrahydroxyisoflavone, can produce oxidative DNA damage(Reference Murata, Midorikawa, Koh, Umezawa and Kawanishi22). Genistein is considered as a pro-oxidant in this regard. In the present study, we employed a non-cancerous cell system to verify the phyto-oestrogen's effect on DNA damage. The same phytocompound was not only able to block oxidative DNA damage caused by DMBA, but it could also reduce DNA strand break. This sharp contrast can be explained by the nature of the model systems. The former study measured 8-oxoG in calf thymus DNA generated from incubating with orobol, NADH and Cu (II). Genistein can also act on oestrogen receptors and apoptosis in breast cancer cells as reviewed by Leung et al. (Reference Leung, Yuen, Leung and Wang23).

The comet assay, which quantifies total cellular DNA damage, revealed that genistein offered a protective effect on DNA integrity against DMBA assault in the present study. As reviewed by Xue & Warshawsky(Reference Xue and Warshawsky24), PAH may induce multifaceted DNA damage. It can be metabolised into isomers of diol-epoxide and radical cations. These diol-epoxides and radical cations of PAH may bind to DNA and form adducts. In addition, PAH-o-quinone and reactive oxygen species may also be generated in an alternative metabolic pathway. The cytochrome p450 enzymes, CYP1A1, 1B1 and 1A2, are responsible in generating those proximate carcinogens. Nevertheless, CYP1A1 and 1B1 are predominantly expressed in extrahepatic tissues, including the breast. Similar to a previous study performed in MCF-7 cells(Reference Chan and Leung15), genistein in the present investigation could suppress the expression of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 induced by DMBA in the non-tumorigenic MCF-10A cells. As the initial steps of diol-epoxide metabolism required CYP1 enzymes, decreased CYP1 expression could produce a lesser amount of diol-epoxides. Subsequent PAH-o-quinone formation and the associated reactive oxygen species generation could also be reduced.

Animal studies have elicited conflicting results on the protective roles of genistein against breast cancer. Pubertal administration of genistein reduced breast cancer incidence in rats(Reference Hilakivi-Clarke, Onojafe, Raygada, Cho, Skaar, Russo and Clarke25, Reference Lamartiniere, Cotroneo, Fritz, Wang, Mentor-Marcel and Elgavish26), while soya given after weaning has been proven to be ineffective on carcinogenesis induced by DMBA(Reference Appelt and Reicks27). Gallo et al. (Reference Gallo, Giacomelli and Cantelmo28) have shown that genistein reduces the percentage of poorly differentiated tumours. In a recent study, genistein is effective in delaying the latency of mammary tumour development in a spontaneous carcinogenesis model(Reference Jin and MacDonald29). In contrast, genistein has been demonstrated to increase DMBA-induced mammary tumours in oestrogen receptor-α-intact mice and encourages the proliferation of MCF-7 tumours in athymic mice(Reference Ju, Allred, Allred, Karko, Doerge and Helferich30) and Sprague–Dawley rats(Reference Allred, Allred, Ju, Clausen, Doerge, Schantz, Korol, Wallig and Helferich31). A recent report has demonstrated that administration of genistein or daidzein alone does not result in significant mutagenic or carcinogenic changes in mammary tissues in ovariectomised or ovary-intact rats; however, administering genistein and daidzein in a mixture reduced DMBA-induced mutagenicity and carcinogenicity in mammary tissues significantly(Reference Manjanatha, Shelton, Bishop, Lyn-Cook and Aidoo32). These reports have shown inconsistent results but the genistein exposure at different stage in the life cycle or carcinogenesis appears to be a critical factor.

In summary, we first demonstrated that oxidative DNA damage induced by PAH was prevented by the soya isoflavone genistein in a non-cancerous breast cell line in the present study. These findings reinforce the notion that the soya isoflavone may block the initiation steps in breast carcinogenesis.

Acknowledgements

All authors contributed to the research work of the present study, and funding of the study was provided by the Chinese University of Hong Kong. There are no conflicts of interest for the present study.

References

1International Agency for Research on Cancer (1983) Polynuclear aromatic compounds, part 1. Chemical, environmental and experimental data. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans, vol. 32. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer.Google Scholar
2Li, D, Wang, M, Dhingra, K & Hittelman, WN (1996) Aromatic DNA adducts in adjacent tissues of breast cancer patients: clues to breast cancer etiology. Cancer Res 56, 287293.Google ScholarPubMed
3Dertinger, SD, Lantum, HB, Silverstone, AE & Gasiewicz, TA (2000) Effect of 30-methoxy-40-nitroflavone on benzo[a]pyrene toxicity. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Biochem Pharmacol 60, 189196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Safe, S (2001) Molecular biology of the Ah receptor and its role in carcinogenesis. Toxicol Lett 120, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Shimizu, Y, Nakatsuru, Y, Ichinose, M, Takahashi, Y, Kume, H, Mimura, J, Fujii-Kuriyama, Y & Ishikawa, T (2000) Benzo[a]-pyrene carcinogenicity is lost in mice lacking the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. PNAS 97, 779782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Buters, JT, Sakai, S, Richter, T, Pineau, T, Alexander, DL, Savas, U, Doehmer, J, Ward, JM, Jefcoate, CR & Gonzalez, FJ (1999) Cytochrome P450 CYP1B1 determines susceptibility to 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced lymphomas. PNAS 96, 19771982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Spink, BC, Fasco, MJ, Gierthy, JF & Spink, DC (1998) 12-O-Tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate upregulates the Ah receptor and differentially alters CYP1B1 and CYP1A1 expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. J Cell Biochem 70, 289296.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Spink, DC, Spink, BC, Cao, JQ, DePasquale, JA, Pentecost, BT, Fasco, MJ, Li, Y & Sutter, TR (1998) Differential expression of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 in human breast epithelial cells and breast tumor cells. Carcinogenesis 19, 291298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Iscan, M, Klaavuniemi, T, Coban, T, Kapucuoglu, N, Pelkonen, O & Raunio, H (2001) The expression of cytochrome P450 enzymes in human breast tumours and normal breast tissue. Breast Cancer Res Treat 70, 4754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10MacDonald, CJ, Ciolino, HP & Yeh, GC (2001) Dibenzoylmethane modulates aryl hydrocarbon receptor function and expression of cytochromes P50 1A1, 1A2, and 1B1. Cancer Res 61, 39193924.Google ScholarPubMed
11Kleiner, HE, Vulimiri, SV, Reed, MJ, Uberecken, A & DiGiovanni, J (2002) Role of cytochrome P450 1A1 and 1B1 in the metabolic activation of 7,12-dimethylbenz-[a]anthracene and the effects of naturally occurring furanocoumarins on skin tumor initiation. Chem Res Toxicol 15, 226235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Taioli, E (1999) International collaborative study on genetic susceptibility to environmental carcinogens. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8, 727728.Google Scholar
13Zheng, W, Xie, DW, Jin, F, Cheng, JR, Dai, Q, Wen, WQ, Shu, XO & Gao, YT (2000) Genetic polymorphism of P450 1B1 and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9, 147150.Google ScholarPubMed
14Ziegler, RG, Hoover, RN, Pike, MC, et al. (1993) Migration patterns and breast cancer risk in Asian-American women. J Natl Cancer Inst 85, 18191827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Chan, HY & Leung, LK (2003) A potential protective mechanism of soya isoflavones against 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene tumour initiation. Br J Nutr 90, 457465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Livak, KJ & Schmittgen, TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta C(T)) method. Methods 25, 402408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Ciolino, HP & Yeh, GC (1999) Inhibition of aryl hydrocarbon induced cytochrome P-450 1A1 enzyme activity and CYP1A1 expression by resveratrol. Mol Pharmacol 56, 760767.Google ScholarPubMed
18Lu, A-L, Yuen, DS & Cillo, J (1996) Catalytic mechanism and DNA substrate recognition of Escherichia coli MutY protein. J Biol Chem 271, 2413824143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Lu, A-L (2000) Repair of A/G and A/8-oxoG mismatches by MutY adenine DNA glycosylase. In DNA Repair Protocols, pp. 316 [Vaughan, P, editor]. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Lu, A-L, Tsai-Wu, JJ & Cillo, J (1995) DNA determinants and substrate specificities of Escherichia coli MutY. J Biol Chem 270, 2358223588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Hazra, TK, Izumi, T, Maidt, L, Floyd, RA & Mitra, S (1998) The presence of two distinct 8-oxo-guanine repair enzymes in human cells: their potential complementary roles in preventing mutation. Nucleic Acids Res 26, 51165122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Murata, M, Midorikawa, K, Koh, M, Umezawa, K & Kawanishi, S (2004) Genistein and daidzein induce cell proliferation and their metabolites cause oxidative DNA damage in relation to isoflavone-induced cancer of oestrogen-sensitive organs. Biochemistry 43, 25692577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Leung, LK, Yuen, YM, Leung, HY & Wang, Y (2005) Dietary soya isoflavones and breast carcinogenesis: a perspective from a cell-culture model. Nutr Res Rev 18, 202211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Xue, W & Warshawsky, D (2005) Metabolic activation of polycyclic and heterocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and DNA damage: a review. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 206, 7393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Hilakivi-Clarke, L, Onojafe, I, Raygada, M, Cho, E, Skaar, T, Russo, I & Clarke, R (1999) Prepubertal exposure to zearalenone or genistein reduces mammary tumorigenesis. Br J Cancer 80, 16821688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Lamartiniere, CA, Cotroneo, MS, Fritz, WA, Wang, J, Mentor-Marcel, R & Elgavish, A (2002) Genistein chemoprevention: timing and mechanisms of action in murine mammary and prostate. J Nutr 132, 552S558S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Appelt, LC & Reicks, MM (1999) Soy induces phase II enzymes but does not inhibit dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced carcinogenesis in female rats. J Nutr 129, 18201826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Gallo, D, Giacomelli, S, Cantelmo, F, et al. (2001) Chemoprevention of DMBA-induced mammary cancer in rats by dietary soy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 69, 153164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Jin, Z & MacDonald, RS (2002) Soy isoflavones increase latency of spontaneous mammary tumour in mice. J Nutr 132, 31863190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Ju, YH, Allred, CD, Allred, KF, Karko, KL, Doerge, DR & Helferich, WG (2001) Physiological concentrations of dietary genistein dose-dependently stimulate growth of estrogen-dependent human breast cancer (MCF-7) tumors implanted in athymic nude mice. J Nutr 131, 29572962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Allred, CD, Allred, KF, Ju, YH, Clausen, LM, Doerge, DR, Schantz, SL, Korol, DL, Wallig, MA & Helferich, WG (2004) Dietary genistein results in larger MNU-induced, oestrogen-dependent mammary tumors following ovariectomy of Sprague–Dawley rats. Carcinogenesis 25, 211218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Manjanatha, MG, Shelton, S, Bishop, ME, Lyn-Cook, LE & Aidoo, A (2006) Dietary effects of soy isoflavones daidzein and genistein on 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]-anthracene-induced mammary mutagenesis and carcinogenesis in ovariectomized Big Blue transgenic rats. Carcinogenesis 27, 25552564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Effect of genistein on 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1 expression. MCF-10A cells were treated with 2·5 μm-DMBA and genistein and cultured for 24 h. mRNA expression of CYP1A1 was quantified by real-time PCR. Values are means (n 3), with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. One-way ANOVA revealed that means are significantly (P < 0·05) different, and a post hoc ranking test indicated that b>c>a.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Effect of genistein on 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1B1 expression. MCF-10A cells were treated with 2·5 μm-DMBA and genistein and cultured for 24 h. mRNA expression of CYP1B1 was quantified by real-time PCR. Values are means (n 3), with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. One-way ANOVA revealed that means are significantly (P < 0·05) different, and a post hoc ranking test indicated that b>c>a.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activity in cells treated with genistein and 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene (DMBA). MCF-10A cells were seeded in ninety-six-well culture plates and treated with 2·5 μm-DMBA and genistein. After a 24 h treatment, the cells were assayed for EROD activity. Values are means (n 3), with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. One-way ANOVA revealed that means are significantly (P < 0·05) different, and a post hoc ranking test indicated that b>c>a.

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Genistein decreased 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene (DMBA)–DNA binding. MCF-10A cells were seeded in six-well culture plates and treated with genistein and 3H-labelled DMBA. After a 24 h treatment, genomic DNA was extracted and the DMBA–DNA lesions were determined by scintillation counting. Values are means (n 3), with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. One-way ANOVA revealed that means are significantly (P < 0·05) different, and a post hoc ranking test indicated that a>b.

Figure 4

Fig. 5 Comet-forming activity in cells treated with 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene (DMBA) and genistein. MCF-10A cells were seeded in six-well culture plates and treated with 2·5 μm-DMBA and genistein. After a 72 h treatment, cells were disaggregated with trypsin/EDTA before incorporation into the comet assay as described in Materials and methods. Cells with a fragmented DNA tail were regarded as damaged cells while those which did not possess a tail were regarded as intact cells. Values are means (n 3), with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. One-way ANOVA revealed that means are significantly (P < 0·05) different, and a post hoc ranking test indicated that a>b.

Figure 5

Fig. 6 Oxidative DNA damage in 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene (DMBA) and genistein-co-treated MCF-10A cells. MCF-10A cells were seeded in six-well culture plates and treated with 2·5 μm-DMBA and genistein for 24 h (A). Cells were disaggregated with trypsin/EDTA, fixed and processed for flow cytometry. Control cells (—) with oxidised DNA conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) are shaded grey. The conjugated profile of cells treated with DMBA (…) shifted to the right. Concentrations of 0·1 (B), 1 (C) and 10 (D) μm-genistein (- - -) were co-adminstrated in the cultures. The geometric means of control, DMBA treatment, DMBA–0·1 μm-genistein co-treatment, DMBA–1 μm genistein co-treatment and DMBA–10 μm-genistein co-treatment are 69, 79, 82, 84 and 68 units of light intensity, respectively.