Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:24:02.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fat-free body mass from skinfold thickness: a close relationship with total body nitrogen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

G. L. Hill
Affiliation:
University Departments of Surgery and Medical Physics, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Great George Street, Leeds 1
J. A. Bradley
Affiliation:
University Departments of Surgery and Medical Physics, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Great George Street, Leeds 1
J. P. Collins
Affiliation:
University Departments of Surgery and Medical Physics, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Great George Street, Leeds 1
I. McCarthy
Affiliation:
University Departments of Surgery and Medical Physics, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Great George Street, Leeds 1
C. B. Oxby
Affiliation:
University Departments of Surgery and Medical Physics, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Great George Street, Leeds 1
L. Burkinshaw
Affiliation:
University Departments of Surgery and Medical Physics, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Great George Street, Leeds 1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fat-free body mass is an important component of body composition which is of particular interest to nutritionists and related workers. Fat-free mass has been determined from the simple measurement of skinfold thickness and it has been demonstrated that there is a close correlation with total body nitrogen even though the test subjects had a wide range of nutritional status.

Type
Short Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1978

References

REFERENCES

Burkinshaw, L., Marshall, P. H., Oldroyd, B. & Oxby, C. B. (1972). Assessment of Radioactive Contamination in Man, p. 165. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A. & Womersley, J. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 32, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, G. B., Gallup, J. & Hursh, J. B. (1961). Science, N.Y. 133, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keys, A. & Brozek, J. (1953). Physiol. Rev. 33, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxby, C. B., Appleby, D. B., Brooks, K., Burkinshaw, L., Krupowicz, D. W., McCarthy, I. D., Oldroyd, B., Ellis, R. E., Collins, J. P. & Hill, G. L. (1978). Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Weiner, J. S. & Lurie, J. A. (1969). Human Biology: A guide to field methods. I.B.P. Handbook no. 9. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. (1965). Human Body Composition, p. 31. Oxford: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar