Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:18:14.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Family food purchases and home food consumption: comparison of nutrient contents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. Nelson ,
P. A. Dyson  and
A. A. Paul
M. Nelson
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council, Dunn Nutrition Unit, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1XJ
P. A. Dyson
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council, Dunn Nutrition Unit, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1XJ
A. A. Paul
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council, Dunn Nutrition Unit, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1XJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Estimates of nutrient intakes based on food purchasing records modelled on the National Food Survey (NFS) were compared with nutrient intakes calculated from food consumption records based on a semi-weighed method, a combination of weighing and household measurement techniques. Of eighty-two families in Cambridge who completed the study, thirty-two were volunteers and fifty were from a random sample in which the co-operation rate was 73%.

2. The estimated energy and nutrient contents of the Cambridge food purchases were very similar to those reported by the NFS for families of similar composition and income. The energy intakes obtained by the semi-weighed method were compared with results from twenty-five studies of energy intake based on quantitative measurements of food consumption: there was no evidence to suggest that the semi-weighed method consistently under- or overestimated intakes in the Cambridge subjects.

3. Purchases adjusted to allow for waste and consumption of food by visitors contained significantly more energy, protein, carbohydrate, calcium, iron and dietary fibre than measured home food consumption. There was no significant difference in the nutrient content of purchases and consumption per 4.184 MJ (1000 kcal), with the exception of Fe and ascorbic acid.

4. Measured wastage of edible food in thirty-one families averaged 3.2% of purchases. Estimate of wastage in all eighty-two families was 3.8%, and consumption of food by visitors accounted for 3.0% of purchases.

5. The excess of purchases over measured home food energy intake is probably accounted for by a net increase in larder stocks rather than wastage, consumption of food by visitors, or under-recording of intakes.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , September 1985 , pp. 373 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1985

References

REFERENCES

Baines, A. H. J. & Hollingsworth, D. F. (1955). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 14, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, T. C., Oddy, D. J. & Yudkin, J. (1970). Occasional Paper no. 1. London: Queen Elizabeth College, University of London.Google Scholar
Bingham, S., McNeil, N. I. & Cummings, J. H. (1981). British Journal of Nutrition 45, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, S., Williams, D. R. R., Cole, T. J. & James, W. P. T. (1979). British Journal of Cancer 40, 456–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, A. E., Billewicz, W. Z. & Thomson, A. M. (1976). British Journal of Nutrition 35, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransby, E. R. & Wagner, G. (1945). British Medical Journal ii, 682–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, N. L., Smart, G. & Judson, H. (1983). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 42, 15A.Google Scholar
Cathcart, E. P. & Murray, A. M. T. (1931). Medical Research Council Special Report Series no. 151. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Central Statistical Office (1979). Social Trends no. 10. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Cook, J., Altman, D. G., Moore, D. M. C., Topp, S. G. & Holland, W. W. (1973). British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine 27, 91–99.Google Scholar
Darke, S. J., Disselduff, M. M. & Try, G. P. (1980). British Journal of Nutrition 44, 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1975). Report on Health and Social Subjects no. 10. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1979). Report on Health and Social Subjects no. 15. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1981). Report on Health and Social Subjects no. 21. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Derry, B. J. & Buss, D. H. (1984). British Medical Journal 288, 765–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowler, E. A. (1977). Journal of Human Nutrition 31, 171–180.Google Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A., Blake, E. C. & Brockway, J. M. (1957). British Journal of Nutrition 11, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A., Lonergan, M. E., Good, J. & Ewan, A. (1974). British Journal of Nutrition 32, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, J., James, J. & Coghill, N. F. (1972). Nutrition (London) 29, 25–32.Google Scholar
Garry, R. C., Passmore, R., Warnock, G. M. & Durnin, J. V. G. A. (1955). Medical Research Council Special Report Series no. 289. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. S. & Scythes, C. A. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 48, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, A. F., Rugg-Gunn, A. J., Appleton, D. R. & Eastoe, J. E. (1982). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 41, 144A.Google Scholar
Hagger, D. L. (1975). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 34, 119A.Google Scholar
Knox, E. G. (1972). British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine 26, 219–223Google Scholar
Lacey, J. H., Chadbund, C., Crisp, A. H., Whitehead, J. & Stordy, J. (1978). Journal of Human Nutrition 32, 419–426.Google Scholar
McKillop, F. M. & Durnin, J. V. G. A. (1982). Human Nutrition: Applied Nutrition 36A, 405–421.Google Scholar
McNaughton, J. W. & Cahn, A. J. (1970). British Journal of Nutrition 24, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmot, M. G., Adelstein, A. M., Robinson, N. & Rose, G. A. (1978). British Medical Journal ii, 1109–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, J. W. (1971). World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 13, 105–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, J. W. (1973). Health Trends 5, 37–39.Google Scholar
Medical Research Council (1924). Medical Research Council Special Report Series no. 87. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1955–1983). Household Food Consumption and Expenditure. Annual reports for the years 1953–1981. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ministry of Food (1951). The Urban Working-class Household Diet 1940–1949. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ministry of Food (1952–1954). Domestic Food Consumption and Expenditure: 1950–1952. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. & Mumford, P. (1977). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36, 47A.Google Scholar
Morgan, J., Mumford, P. & Evans, E. (1976). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 35, 74A–75A.Google Scholar
National Center for Health Statistics (1977). Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Advancedata HRA 77–1250. no. 6. Rockville, Md: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. (1983). A dietary survey method for measuring family food purchases and individual nutrient intakes concurrently, and its use in dietary surveillance. PhD Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. & Nettleton, P. A. (1980). Journal of Human Nutrition 34, 325–348.Google Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1971). Classification of Occupations. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Orr, J. B. (1936). Food, Health and Income. Report on a Survey of Adequacy of Diet in Relation to Income. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Paton, D. N. & Findlay, L. (1926). Medical Research Council Special Report Series no. 101. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Paul, A. A. & Southgate, D. A. T. (1978). McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Platt, B. S., Gray, P. G., Parr, E., Baines, A. H. J., Clayton, S., Hobson, E. A., Hollingsworth, D. F., Berry, W. T. C. & Washington, E. (1964). British Journal of Nutrition 18, 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruck, N. (1974). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 33, 17A–18A.Google Scholar
Shaper, A. G. & Marr, J. W. (1977). British Medical Journal 1, 867–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stordy, B. J. (1972). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 31, 81A–83A.Google Scholar
Thomson, M., Logan, R. L., Sharman, M., Lockerbie, L., Riemersma, R. A. & Oliver, M. F. (1982). Human Nutrition: Applied Nutrition 36A, 272–280.Google Scholar
United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare (1972). Ten-State Nutrition Survey 1968–1970. DHEW Publication no. (HMS) 72–8130.Google Scholar
Waley, S. (1978). Private Household and Institutional Population Tables. Cambridge: Cambridgeshire County Planning Department.Google Scholar
Wenlock, R. W. & Buss, D. H. (1977). Journal of Human Nutrition 31, 405–411.Google Scholar
Wenlock, R. W., Buss, D. H., Derry, B. J. & Dixon, E. J. (1980). British Journal of Nutrition 43, 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, R. G., Paul, A. A. & Cole, T. J. (1981). Journal of Human Nutrition 35, 339–348.Google Scholar
Wiles, S. J., Nettleton, P. A., Black, A. E. & Paul, A. A. (1980). Journal of Human Nutrition 34, 189–223.Google Scholar
Yarnell, J. W. G., Fehily, A. M., Milbank, J. E., Sweetnam, P. M. & Walker, C. L. (1983). Human Nutrition: Applied Nutrition 37A, 103–112.Google Scholar