Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:26:47.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of the net energy value of glucose (cerelose) and maize starch in diets for rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

John W. Hilton ,
James L. Atkinson  and
Stanley J. Slinger
John W. Hilton
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
James L. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
Stanley J. Slinger
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Quadruplicate groups of rainbow trout (Sulmo gairdneri) (mean body-weight 24.9 g) were reared on six dietary treatments (practical-type diets) in a modified paired-feeding experiment for 12 weeks at 15° to determine the net energy (NE) value of starch and glucose to rainbow trout.

2. Three test diets were prepared to contain (g/kg): 0 supplemented carbohydrate (diet 1), 250 maize starch (diet 2) and 250 glucose (diet 3) and were given ad lib. to the trout with the feeding rate of the glucose- and starchfed groups being monitored after each feeding. The remaining three treatments involved controlled feeding of the trout with diet 1 at 75% of the feed intake of trout reared on diets 2 and 3, so as to provide the same levels of protein and lipids without carbohydrate, and with diet 2 at 100% of the feed intake of trout reared on diet 3.

3. The difference in the final carcass energy of the ad lib.-fed group and the respective controlled-fed group divided by the amount of dietary glucose or starch energy consumed by the trout is the NE value for that carbohydrate.

4. The determined NE value of glucose was 3.99 kJ/g and starch 2.17 kJ/g, which is 24.6 and 12.6% respectively of the gross energy values of these carbohydrates in rainbow trout.

5. The results indicate that digestible energy and calculated metabolizable energy values for carbohydrates in rainbow trout overestimate the utilizable energy content of the diet.

6. The determined NE values for glucose and starch in the present study should be used with caution since various factors (such as the feeding rate determined in the present study) may affect the utilization of dietary carbohydrates in rainbow trout.

Type
General Nutrition papers
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , November 1987 , pp. 453 - 461
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1987

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, J. L., Hilton, J. W. & Slinger, S. J. (1984). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and0 Aquatic Sciences 41, 1384–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beamish, F. W. H., Hilton, J. W., Niimi, E. &Slinger, S. J. (1986). Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 1, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergot, F. (1979). Aquaculture 18, 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergot, F. & Breque, J. (1983). Aquaculture 34, 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bligh, E. G. & Dyer, W. G. (1959). Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology 37, 911–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. R. & Halver, J. E. (1961). Journal of Nutrition 74, 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, C. Y., Slinger, S. J. & Bayley, H. S. (1982). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 73B, 25–41.Google Scholar
Clegg, K. M. (1956). Journal of the Science of Food Agriculture 7, 40–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J., McDonald, I. & Williams, R. B. (1957). Journal of the Science of Food Agriculture 8, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraps, G. S. & Carlyle, E. C. (1942). Texas Agriculture Experimental Station Bulletin 625, 1–51.Google Scholar
Hill, F.W. & Andersen, D. L. (1958). Journal of Nutrition 64, 587–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, J. W. (1982). Journal of Fish Biology 20, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, J. W. & Atkinson, J. L. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 47, 597–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, J. W., Atkinson, J. L. & Slinger, S. J. (1982). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 39, 1229–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, J. W., Atkinson, J. L. & Slinger, S. J. (1983). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40, 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, J. W., Cho, C. Y. & Slinger, S. J. (1981). Aquaculture 25, 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, J. W. & Slinger, S. J. (1981). Canadian Special Publication Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55, 1–15.Google Scholar
Hilton, J. W. & Slinger, S. J. (1983). Aquaculture 35, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, J. W. & Slinger, S. J. (1986). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 43, 1149–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, W. (1980). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists, 13th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Jobling, M. (1983). Journal of Fish Biology 23, 685–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaushik, J. & de Oliva Teles, A. (1985). Aquaculture 50, 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luquet, P. (1971). Annales Hydrobiologique 2, 685–703.Google Scholar
Murat, J. C. & Serfaty, A. (1974). Clinical Chemistry 20, 1576–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (1981). Nutritional Energetics of Domestic Animals and Glossary of Energy Terms. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. N. & Ryman, B. E. (1972). Journal of Fish Biology 4, 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, A. M. Jr (1969). In Fish Physiology, vol. 1, pp. 18–69 [Hoar, N. S. and Randall, D. J., editors]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. M. Jr (1972). In Fish Nutrition, pp. 1–28 [Halver, J.E., editor]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. M. Jr, Tunison, A. V. & Brockway, D. R. (1948). Fisheries Research Bulletin 11, 1–44.Google Scholar
Singh, R. P. & Nose, T. (1967). Bulletin Freshwater Fisheries Research Laboratory 17, 21–25.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. (1971). Progressive Fish-Culturist 33, 132–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spannhof, L. & Plantikow, H. (1983). Aquaculture 30, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1980). Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach, 2nd ed, p. 633. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Book.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, T., Watanabe, T. & Ogino, C. (1979). Bulletin Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries 45, 977–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. P. & Poe, W. E. (1978). Journal of Nutrition 177, 280–286.Google Scholar
Windell, J. T., Folty, J. W. & Sarakon, J. A. (1978). Progressive Fish-Culturist 40, 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar