Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:37:03.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of American and British rations for growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R. S. Barber
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, England
R. Braude
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, England
Zena D. Hosking
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, England
K. G. Mitchell
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, England
W. H. Bruner
Affiliation:
Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio, USA
V. R. Cahill
Affiliation:
Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio, USA
J. J. Gilliland
Affiliation:
Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio, USA
R. F. Gundlach
Affiliation:
Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio, USA
H. S. Teague
Affiliation:
Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A test was carried out simultaneously in Shinfield, Reading, England, and Columbus, Ohio, USA, using typical British and American rations for growing pigs. The rations were compounded in their country of origin; half of each consignment was used at the home station and the other half shipped to the overseas station. 2. Both restricted feeding and ad lib. feeding methods were used at each station. 3. A similar pattern of results was obtained at Shinfield and Columbus. Pigs receiving the American ration, which was higher in energy content, grew faster and required less feed per kg live-weight gain than pigs receiving the British ration. The higher energy content of the ration was probably responsible also for the poorer carcass quality of the pigs receiving the American ration, particularly the high fat content. The comparison between restricted feeding and ad lib. feeding was not affected by the type of ration. Restricted feeding resulted in slower growth rate, slightly better efficiency of feed conversion and considerably better carcass quality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1966

References

REFERENCES

Buck, S. F., Harrington, G. & Johnson, R. F. (1962). Anim. Prod. 4, 25.Google Scholar
Gundlach, R. F. (1964). A study of certain chemical and physical factors of pork produced from American and British rations. Thesis, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar