Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:53:24.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimates of maintenance requirement of growing lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2008

D. J. Thomson
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5LR
J. S. Fenlon
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5LR
S. B. Cammell
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5LR
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Total body energy retention (ER) and metabolizable energy intake (MEI) values from experiments with 231 lambs (Suffolk ♂× (Border Leicester ♂× Cheviot ♀) ♀) housed indoors and given thirteen forage diets were used to estimate the metabolizable energy (ME) required for maintenance.

2. ER was measured using the comparative slaughter technique, and the lambs were fed at several planes of nutrition above maintenance between 2 and 5 months of age.

3. The daily ER and MEI results were scaled to live weight (kg0.75) and linear regression lines fitted to the values for individual diets. Extrapolation of the fitted lines to zero ER gave estimates of maintenance requirement ranging from 141 to 466 kJ ME/kg0.75 per d and values for the efficiency of utilization of ME for growth and fattening (kf) of 0.25–0.53 (mean 0.39).

4. An alternative analysis constrained the estimated maintenance requirement to be the same for all diets. An iterative search procedure indicated minimal residual variation at 339 kJ/kg0.75 per d. This common value of ME for maintenance gave kf values ranging from 0.30 to 0.54 (mean 0.39).

5. The implications of the technique were considered togethe with some discussion of the variability of the estimate. Allowing the minimum RSD to vary by 10% gave a maintenance requirement of between 231 and 408 kJ/kg0.75 per d.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1979

References

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1962). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Boyne, A. W. (1910). Publs. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. 13, 9.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Clapperton, J. L. (1965). Br. J. Nutr. 19, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, T. J. & Robinson, J. J. (1969). Anim. Prod. 11, 389.Google Scholar
Garrett, W. N., Lofgreen, G. P. & Meyer, J. H. (1964). J. Anim. Sci. 23, 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. Mc. & Searle, T. W. (1972). J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 79, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, M. (1963). Publs. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. 11, 427.Google Scholar
Milford, R. (1965). Herbage digestibility and animal production. PhD Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Tech. Bull. no. 33.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & McDonald, I. (1970). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. 13, 121.Google Scholar
Paladines, O. L., Reid, J. T., van Niekerk, B. D. H. & Bensadoun, A. (1964). J. Nutr. 83, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, A. M. (1976). A study of the energy metabolism and seasonal cycles of captive red deer. PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J. (1963). Publs. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. 11, 319.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J. (1968). The utilization of herbage diets by growing sheep. PhD Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. (1978). Wld Rev. Nutr. Diet. 30, 189.Google Scholar
Williams, E. J. (1959). Regression Analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar