Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-4ks9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-11T11:27:53.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The energy cost of human lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. M. Thomson ,
F. E. Hytten  and
W. Z. Billewicz
A. M. Thomson
Affiliation:
MRC Reproduction and Growth Unit, Princess Mary Maternity Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE 2 3BD
F. E. Hytten
Affiliation:
MRC Reproduction and Growth Unit, Princess Mary Maternity Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE 2 3BD
W. Z. Billewicz
Affiliation:
MRC Reproduction and Growth Unit, Princess Mary Maternity Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE 2 3BD
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The energy values of the diets of twenty-three women who were breast-feeding and thirty-two who were bottle-feeding their babies were determined by 7 d weighed surveys. All the subjects were healthy and living at home, and their babies were thriving. The lactating mothers took, on average, 591 kcal (2.5 MJ)/d more than those who were not lactating.

2. Both groups were losing weight, on average. The estimated contribution of such losses to the total energy supply was added to and the amounts expended on basal metabolism deducted from the dietary energy intakes. Since the activity of each group was fairly similar, it was possible to conclude that the average amount of energy available to support lactation was 618 kcal (2.6 MJ) daily. The average energy value of the milk produced was estimated from the weights of the babies to be 597 kcal (2.5 MJ) daily.

3. Critical evaluation of those averages, and of the assumptions on which they were based, led to the conclusion that the energy exchanges in human lactation have an efficiency of 90% or more, with a lower limit of about 80%.

4. The additional supply of 600 kcal (2.5 MJ) in the daily diet should suffice to support lactation and a ‘round figure’ of 500 kcal (2.1MJ) daily may be regarded as reasonable in official recommended allowances.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 1970 , pp. 565 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1970

References

Best, W. R. (1954). J. Lab. clin. Med. 44, 768.Google Scholar
Dennis, K. J. & Bytheway, W. R. (1965). J. Obstet. Gynaec. Br. Commonw. 72, 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, R. M. & Hitchcock, N. E. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (1950). F.A.O. nutr. Stud. no. 5.Google Scholar
FAO (1957). F.A.O. nutr. Stud. no. 15.Google Scholar
Fomon, S. J., Owen, G. M. & Thomas, L. N. (1964). Am. J. Dis. Child. 108, 601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, J. M., Hobson, E. A. & Hollingsworth, D. F. (1962). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 21, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hytten, F. E. & Leitch, I. (1964). The Physiology of Human Pregnancy. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Hytten, F. E. & Thomson, A. M. (1961). In Milk: the Mammary Gland and its Secretion Vol. 2, Ch. 13. [Kon, S. K. and Cowie, A. T., editors.] New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keys, A., Anderson, J. T. & Brozek, J. (1955). Metabolism 4, 427.Google Scholar
Khosla, T. & Billewicz, W. Z. (1964). Br. J. Nutr. 18, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Health: Department of Health and Social Security (1969). Rep. publ. Hlth med. Subj., Lond. no. 120.Google Scholar
National Research Council: Food and Nutrition Board (1968). Publs natn. Res. Coun., Wash. no. 1694, 7th revised ed.Google Scholar
Quenouille, M. H., Boyne, A. W., Fisher, W. B. & Leitch, I. (1951). Tech. Commun. Commonw. Bur. Anim. Nutr. no. 17.Google Scholar
Shukers, C. F., Macy, I. G., Nims, B., Donelson, E. & Hunscher, H. A. (1932). J. Nutr. 5, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. M. (1958). Br. J. Nutr. 12, 446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. M. & Billewicz, W. Z. (1965). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 24, xix.Google Scholar
Wishnofsky, M. (1958). Am. J, clin. Nutr. 6, 542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar