Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T10:02:52.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The energy cost of fat and protein deposition in the rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2007

J. D. Pullar  and
A. J. F. Webster
J. D. Pullar
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
A. J. F. Webster
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Measurements were made of energy balance by direct calorimetry, and of nitrogen balance in groups of lean and congenitally obese (‘fatty’) Zucker rats at body-weights of 200 and 350 g given a highly digestible semisynthetic diet at 14.0 or 18.4 g/rat per 24 h.

2. Losses of food energy and N in faeces were very small. The fatty rats lost much more N in urine than did lean rats. Despite this the proportion of gross energy that was metabolized was 0.92 for both fatty and lean rats.

3. In all trials, fatty rats lost a smaller proportion of metabolizable energy (ME) as heat and deposited less as protein than thin rats but deposited much more as fat.

4. The amounts of ME required to deposit 1 kJ of protein and 1 kJ of fat respectively were shown by regression analysis to be 2.25 (±0.16) and 1.36 (±0.06) kJ respectively. These values agree extremely closely with recent, more tentative, estimates based on assumptions as to maintenance requirement which the present experiments were able to circumvent. It may be concluded with confidence that the energy costs of depositing 1 g of protein or fat are almost identical at 53 kJ ME/g.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , May 1977 , pp. 355 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1977

References

REFERENCES

ARC/MRC Committee (1974). Food and Nutrition Research report of ARC/MRC Committee, p. 30. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1967). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. London: Hutchinson Scientific and Technical.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wainman, F. W. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breirem, K. (1939). Biedermanns Zbl. Tierernähr. 11, 487.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. & Mount, L. E. (1975). Br. J. Nutr. 34, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, W. H., Verstegen, M. W. A. & Mount, L. E. (1973). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 32, 72A.Google Scholar
Gädeken, D., Oslage, H. J. & Fliegel, H. (1973). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 14, p. 169.Google Scholar
Kielanowski, J. (1965). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 11, p. 13.Google Scholar
Kielanowski, J. (1976). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 15.Google Scholar
Kielanowski, J. & Kotarbinska, M. (1970). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 13, p. 145.Google Scholar
Klieber, M. (1961). The Fire of Life. New York: Wiley Ltd.Google Scholar
McCracken, K. J. & Weatherup, S. T. C. (1973). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 32, 66A.Google Scholar
Pullar, J. D. (1969). In International Encyclopedia of Food and Nutrition, Vol. 17. Nutrition of Animals of Agricultural Importance, part 1, p. 471 [Cuthbertson, D. editor]. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Pullar, J. D. & Webster, A. J. F. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 31, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiemann, R. (1970). Wiss. Z. Humbolt-Univ. Berl., Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Reihe 19, 35.Google Scholar
Thorbek, G. (1970). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 13, p. 129.Google Scholar
Thorbek, G. (1975). Beretn. St. Husdryrbrugs Forsøg., København no. 424.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F., Brockway, J. M. & Smith, J. S. (1974). Anim. Prod. 19, 127.Google Scholar
Zucker, L. M. & Zucker, T. F. (1961). J. Hered. 52, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar