Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:45:02.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of plane of nutrition and environmental temperature on the energy metabolism of the growing pig

3*. The efficiency of energy utilization for maintenance and growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

W. H. Close
W. H. Close
Affiliation:
ARC Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4AT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. From the relation between metabolizable energy (me) intake and heat loss (H), energy retention (ER), protein (P) and fat (F) deposition the energy costs of maintenance (MEm) and the partial efficiencies of energy retention (k) and protein (kp) and fat (kf) retention were determined in growing pigs at environmental temperatures of 10, 15, 20, 25 or 30°.

2. k decreased with increase in environmental temperature from 0.79 at 10° to 0.63 at 30° with 0.67 at the thermally-neutral temperature of 25°. Each 0.04 decrease in k was associated with a 100 kJ/kg0.75 per d decrease in mem Analysis, within several ranges of environmental temperature, suggested a curvilinear relation between ER and me intake indicating a decrease in k with increase in level of feeding, particularly at thermally-neutral temperatures.

3. Both kp and kf were similar at each environmental temperature and decreased from 0.78 at 10° to 0.63 at 30°. These values are discussed in relation to those predicted from experimentation and it is suggested that the wide range of predicted estimates of kp could be attributed to differences in the rate of protein turnover.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , November 1978 , pp. 433 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1978

References

Armstrong, D. G. (1969). In Handbuch der Tierernährung, Vol. 1, p 385 [Lenkeit, W., Breirem, K. and Crasemann, E., editors]. Hamburg: Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1962). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. London: Hutchinson Scientific and Technical.Google Scholar
Burlacu, G., Baia, G., Ionila, D., Moisa, D., Tascenco, V., Visan, I. & Stoica, I. (1973). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 81, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burlacu, G., Illiescu, M. & Stravi, J. (1976). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 19, p. 181.Google Scholar
Buttery, P. J. & Boorman, K. N. (1976). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 16, p. 197.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. & Mount, L. E. (1971). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 30, 33A.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. & Mount, L. E. (1975). Br. J. Nutr. 34, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, W. H. & Mount, L. E. (1978). Br. J. Nutr. 40, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, W. H., Mount, L. E. & Brown, D. (1978). Br. J. Nutr. 40, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, W. H., Verstegen, M. W. A. & Mount, L. E. (1973). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 32, 72A.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. F. & Boyne, A. W. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 28, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gädeken, D., Oslage, H. J. & Fliegel, H. (1974). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 14, p. 169.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC., Wainman, F. W., Blaxter, K. L. & Armstrong, D. G. (1959). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 52, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kielanowski, J. (1965). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 11, p. 13.Google Scholar
Kielanowski, J. (1972). In Pig Production, p. 183 [Cole, D. J. A., editor]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Kielanowski, J. (1976). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 16, p. 207.Google Scholar
Kotarbinska, M. (1969). Wydaw. wlasne Inst. Zootech., Wroclaw, no. 238.Google Scholar
Millward, D. J., Garlick, P. J., James, W. P. T., Sender, P. M. & Waterlow, J. C. (1976). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 16, p. 49.Google Scholar
Mount, L. E. (1976). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 35, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oslage, H. J., Gädeken, D. & Fliegel, H. (1970). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 13, p. 133.Google Scholar
Pullar, J. D. & Webster, A. J. F. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 31, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullar, J. D. & Webster, A. J. F. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 35, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiemann, R. (1963). Deutsche Akademie der Landn. Sitzungsberichte 12, 39.Google Scholar
Schiemann, R., Chudy, A. & Herceg, O. (1969). Archs. Tierernähr. 19, 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiemann, R., Hoffmann, L. & Nehring, K. (1961). Archs Tierernähr. 11, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffee, W. P., Goldsmith, R. S., Pencharz, P. B., Schrimshaw, N. S. & Young, V. R. (1976). Metabolism 25, 281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorbek, G. (1970). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 13, p. 129.Google Scholar
Thorbek, G. (1975). Beretn. Forsøgslab. no. 424.Google Scholar
Tschudy, D. P., Bacchus, H., Weissman, S., Watkin, D. M., Eubanks, M. & White, J. (1959). J. clin. Invest. 38, 892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verstegen, M. W. A., Close, W. H., Start, I. B. & Mount, L. E. (1973). Br. J. Nutr. 30, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar