Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:43:25.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of overfeeding by gastric intubation on body composition of adult female rats and on heat production during feeding and fasting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

K. J. McCracken
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Chemistry Research Division, Department of Agriculture, Northern Ireland and The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland
Mary A. McNiven
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The effects of overfeeding by gastric intubation on the body composition and energy metabolism of adult female rats were studied in three experiments.

2. In Expt 1 there were significant (P < 0·001) linear increases in carcass dry matter, fat and energy during a 10 d period as metabolizable energy (ME) intake was increased from 160 to 300 kJ/d.

3. In Expt 2 rats were fed to maintain weight (130 kJ/d) or given approximately 270 kJ/d for 120 d. Measurements of fed and fasting heat production (FHP) were made at intervals. FHP (kJ/d per kg metabolic weight (W0·75)) decreased by 15% over the 120 d period on both treatments. The mean carcass weight of the overfed rats increased from 216 to 465 g, over 90% of the increase being due to fat.

4. In Expt 3 rats were fed to maintain weight (137 kJ/d) or given approximately 300 kJ/d for 6, 12, 18, 24 or 30 d. There were significant linear increases (P < 0·001) with time in carcass weight, dry matter, fat and energy. FHP, measured before slaughter, increased from 118 to 160 kJ/d but remained constant at 334 kJ/d per kg W0·75.

5. In all three experiments there were significant (P < 0·01) increases in carcass crude protein (nitrogen × 6·25) in response to overfeeding.

6. The efficiency of utilization of energy for production (Expt 1) or for maintenance and production (Expts 2 and 3) averaged 0·92, 0·86, 0·88 respectively.

7. It is concluded that FHP per kg W0·75 may be regarded as constant over a wide range of body compositions in adult rats made obese by gastric intubation, and that energy utilization conforms to classical concepts.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

REFERENCES

Apfelbaum, M., Bostsarron, J. & Lacatis, D. (1971). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 24, 1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1976). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 19. p. 129.Google Scholar
Brouwer, E. (1965). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 11, p. 441.Google Scholar
Chesters, J. K. (1975). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 34, 104A.Google Scholar
Cohn, C. & Joseph, D. (1959). Am. J. Physiol. 196, 965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, C. & Joseph, D. (1968). J. Nutr. 96, 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauncey, M. J. (1980). Br. J. Nutr. 43, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deb, S., Martin, R. J. & Hershberger, T. V. (1976). J. Nutr. 106, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drenick, E. J., Hunt, I. F. & Swenseid, M. E. (1968). Am. J. Publ. Hlth 58, 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrow, J. S. (1978). Energy Balance and Obesity in Man. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Gray, R. & McCracken, K. J. (1976). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 19, p. 335.Google Scholar
McCracken, K. J. (1975). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 34, 15A.Google Scholar
McCracken, K. J. (1976). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 35, 3A.Google Scholar
McCracken, K. J. & Gray, R. (1976). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 19, p. 141.Google Scholar
McCracken, K. J. & McNiven, M. A. (1982). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 41, 31A.Google Scholar
McNiven, M. A. (1980). The effect of body fatness on the maintenance energy requirements of adult rats. PhD Thesis, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Mickelsen, O., Takahashi, S. & Craig, C. (1955). J. Nutr. 57, 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. S. & Mumford, P. (1967). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 20, 1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norgan, N. G. & Durnin, J. V. G. A. (1980). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 33, 978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passmore, R., Meiklejohn, A. P., Dewar, A. D. & Thow, R. (1955). Br. J. Nutr. 9, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passmore, R., Strong, J. A., Swindells, Y. E. & el Din, N. (1963). Br. J. Nutr. 17, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullar, J. D. & Webster, A. J. F. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 37, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalafani, A. & Springer, D. (1976). Physiol. Behav. 17, 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, E. A. H., Danforth, E., Horton, E. S., Bray, G. A., Glennon, J. A. & Salans, L. B. (1973). Rec. Progr. Horm. Res. 29, 457.Google Scholar
Sørenson, P. H. (1962). In Nutrition of Pigs and Poultry. Proceedings of the University of Nottingham, 8th Easter School, p. 88 [Morgan, J. T. and Lewis, D. editors]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Waring, J. J. & Brown, W. O. (1965). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 65, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zed, C. A. & James, W. P. T. (1982). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 41, 32A.Google Scholar