Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:09:43.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of food restriction and exercise on site-specific differences in adipocyte volume and adipose tissue cellularity in the guinea-pig

1. Superficial and intra-abdominal sites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Caroline M. Pond ,
Christine A. Mattacks  and
Dawn Sadler
Caroline M. Pond
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA
Christine A. Mattacks
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA
Dawn Sadler
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The volume and number of adipocytes were measured in fourteen anatomical sites of adult guinea-pigs kept in small cages and fed ad lib. kept in small cages and on restricted diet or fed ad lib. and exercised.

2. In the sedentary ad lib.-fed animals, there was no significant correlation between percentage body-weight as adipose tissue, as determined by direct dissection, and mean adipocyte volume based on samples from many different sites. The correlation was significant, though not high, for sedentary, restricted-diet animals and for exercised specimens.

3. The correlations between the volume of adipocytes from left–right pairs of sites, and from sites around the same limb, were highly significant under all conditions studied. The correlation between the volume of adipocytes from sites other than left–right pairs of sites was weaker and in some cases statistically insignificant in sedentary ad lib.-fed guinea-pigs. The volume of adipocytes from sites in the groin region, the mesenteries and medial to the trapezius muscle failed to correlate in many cases with the volume of adipocytes from other sites sampled.

4. The number of adipocytes at each site was similar in the exercised and sedentary ad lib.-fed animals. The restricted-diet, sedentary group had fewer adipocytes at all sites studied except the omental and mesenteric fat mass and the groin sites.

5. It is suggested that moderate regular exercise or fasting gives rise to closer coordination between adipocytes at different sites because central factors regulating adipocyte volume become more prominent than local factors.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , May 1984 , pp. 415 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1984

References

REFERENCES

Ashwell, M., Chinn, S., Stalley, S. & Garrow, J. S. (1978). International Journal of Obesity 2, 289–302.Google Scholar
Butler-Hogg, B. W. & Wood, J. D. (1982). Animal Production 35, 253–262.Google Scholar
Di Girolamo, M., Mendlinger, S. & Fertig, J. W. (1971). American Journal of Physiology 221, 850–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldrick, R. B. (1967). American Journal of Physiology 212, 777–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, M. I., Jung, R. T., Robinson, M. P. & James, W. P. T. (1982). International Journal of Obesity 6, 419–436.Google Scholar
Gurr, M. I. & Kirtland, J. (1978). International Journal of Obesity 2, 401–427.Google Scholar
Hirsch, J. & Batchelor, B. (1976). Clinics in Endocrinology and Medicine 5, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, J. & Han, P. W. (1969). Journal of Lipid Research 10, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirtland, J. & Gurr, M. I. (1979). Infernational Journal of Obesity 3, 15–55.Google Scholar
Kirtland, J., Gurr, M. I. & Widdowson, E. M. (1976). Nutrition and Metabolism 20, 338–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissebah, A. J., Vydelingum, N., Murray, R., Evans, D. J., Hartz, A. J., Kalkhoff, R. K. & Adams, P. W. (1982). Journal of Clinical and Endocrinological Metabolism 54, 254–260.Google Scholar
Knittle, J. L., Ginsberg-Fellner, F. & Brown, R. E. (1977). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 30, 762–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krotkiewski, M. & Björntorp, P. (1976). Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 96, 122–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krotkiewski, M., Björntorp, P. & Sjöstrom, L. (1975 a). In Recent Advances in Obesity Research pp. 97–100 [Howard, A., editor]. London: Newman.Google Scholar
Krotkiewski, M., Bjöntorp, P., Sjöström, L. & Smith, U. (1975 b). Metabolism 24, 703–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, K. A. & Anderson, D. B. (1978). Growth 42, 469–477.Google Scholar
Lithell, H. & Boberg, J. (1978). International Journal of Obesity 2, 47–52.Google Scholar
Martinsson, A. (1968). Acta Morphological Néerlando - Scandinavica 7, 41–50.Google Scholar
Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. & Bent, D. H. (1975). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pond, C. M. (1984 a). Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 52, 1–31.Google Scholar
Pond, C. M. (1984 b). In Functional Morphology of Vertebrates [Duncker, H.-R. & Fleischer, G., editors]. Stuttgart & New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Pond, C. M., Mattacks, C. A. & Sadler, D. (1984). British Journal of Nutrition 51, 425–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjöström, L. (1980). In Obesity pp. 72–100 [Stunkard, A. J., editor]. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Skerlj, B., Brozek, J. & Hunt, E. (1953). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 11, 577–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar