Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mggfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T23:06:00.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

EFFECTS OF DIETARY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REDUCING FREE SUGAR INTAKES, ON FREE SUGAR INTAKES, DIETARY PROFILES AND ANTHROPOMETRY: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2025

Lucy R Boxall
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, UK.
Emily Arden-Close
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, UK.
Janet James
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK.
Katherine M Appleton*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, UK.
*
Corresponding Author: Prof. Katherine M Appleton, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Poole House, Fern Barrow, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB. Tel: +44 (0)1202 965985. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Free sugar intakes are currently higher than recommended for health, yet effective strategies for reducing consumption are yet to be elucidated. This work investigated the effects of different dietary recommendations for reducing free sugar intakes, on relevant outcomes, in UK adults consuming >5% total energy intake (TEI) from free sugars. Using a randomized controlled parallel-group design, 242 adults received nutrient-based (N=61), nutrient- and food-based (N=60), nutrient-, food- and food-substitution-based (N=63) or no (N=58) recommendations for reducing free sugars at a single timepoint, with effects assessed for the following 12 weeks. Primary outcomes were free sugar intakes as a percentage of TEI (%FS) and adherence to the recommendations at week 12. Secondary outcomes included TEI, diet composition, sugar-sweetened and low-calorie-sweetened food consumption and anthropometry. In Intention-to-Treat analyses adjusted for baseline measures, %FS reduced in intervention groups (%FSchange=-2.5 to -3.3%) compared to control (%FSchange=-1.2%) (smallest B=-0.573, p=0.03), with effects from week 1 until week 12, and no differences between interventions (largest B=0.352, p=0.42). No effects of intervention were found in dietary profiles, but change in %FS was associated with change in %TEI from non-sugar carbohydrate (B=0.141, p<0.01) and from protein (B=-0.171, p=0.02). Body weight was also lower at week 12 in intervention groups compared to control (B=-0.377, p<0.05), but associations with %FS were weak. Our findings demonstrate benefit from dietary recommendations for reducing free sugar intakes in UK adults. Limited advantages were found for the different dietary recommendations, but variety may offer individual choice.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04816955, registration date: 24.03.21.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society