Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T14:20:14.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of continuous ruminal dosing with dioctyl sodium sulphosuccinate on ruminal and metabolic characteristics of lactating Holstein cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

C.-M. J. Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
G. A. Vargat
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Rumen-cannulated Holstein cows were used to study the effect of intraruminal dosing of dioctyl sodium sulphosuccinate (DSS; 0.07 g/kg body weight per d) for 4 weeks. DSS was suspended in nylon bags to allow it to be released slowly into the rumen. Cows were offered a diet containing grass silage and concentrate (45:55, w/w). Intakes of control cows were regulated to those of DSS-dosed cows. Cows dosed with DSS had no rumen ciliate protozoa, lower rumen NH3-N concentrations and acetate and butyrate proportions, higher propionate, isovalerate, and valerate proportions. In vitro fibre digestion by non-ciliate rumen fluid from DSS-dosed cows was apparently impaired. When cows were dosed with DSS, levels of neutral- and acid-detergent fibre in whole rumen contents were increased, rumen solids turnover rate was slower, and whole tract apparent digestibility of cellulose and diethyl ether extract was decreased. Dosing of DSS led to reduced concentrations of blood acetoacetate but elevated plasma glucose levels. Milk protein content was higher, however, lactose content was lower for DSS-dosed than control cows. Milk fat of DSS-dosed cows had a smaller proportion of short-chain fatty acids but a greater proportion of unsaturated fatty acids.

Type
Rumenal Metabolism
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1993

References

REFERENCES

Adams, R. S. (1980). Forage testing service revised regression equations. Dairy Science Extension Bulletin no, 80–56. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1970). Official Methods of Analysis, 11th ed. Washington. DC: AOAC.Google Scholar
Cambridge Mcdical Technology Corp. (1990). Animal Insulin Radioimmunoassay Procedure. Catalog no. IV 732. Billcrica. MA: Cambridge Medical Technology Corp.Google Scholar
Chaney, A. L. & Marbach, E. P. (1962). Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clinical Chemistry 8, 130132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christopherson, S. W. & Glass, R. L. (1969). Preparation of milk fat methyl esters by alcoholysis in an essentially nonalcoholic solution. Journal of Dairy Science 52, 12891290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eadie, M. J. & Shand, W. J. (1981). The effect of Synperonic NP, upon ciliate-free and faunated sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 40, 113A.Google Scholar
Folch, J., Lees, M. & Sloane Stanley, G. H. (1957). A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 226, 497509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage Fiber Analyses. USDA Agriculture Handbook no. 379. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Jenness, R. (1985). Biochemical and nutritional aspects of milk and colostrum. In Lactation, pp. 164197 [Larson, B. L., editor]. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
John, A. & Ulyatt, M. J. (1984). Measurement of protozoa, using phosphatidyl choline, and of bacteria, using nucleic acids, in the duodenal digesta of sheep fed chaffed lucerne hay (Medicago sativa L.) diets. Journal of Agriculturul Science, Cambridge 102, 3344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouany, J. P., Demeyer, D. I. & Grain, J. (1988). Effect of defaunating the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology 21, 229265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronfeld, D. S., Raggi, F. & Ramberg, C. F. Jr (1968). Mammary blood flow and ketone body metabolism in normal, fasted, and ketotic cows. American Journal of Physiology 215, 218227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larson, B. L. (1985). Biosynthesis and cellular secretion of milk. In Lactation, pp. 129163 [Larson, B. L., editor]. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Lovelock, L. K. A., Buchanan-Smith, J. G. & Forsberg, C. W. (1982). Difficulties in defaunation of the ovine rumen. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 62, 299303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, E. I. (1948). Studies on ruminant saliva. I. The composition and output of sheep's saliva. Biochemical Journal 42, 99104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellanby, J. & Williamson, D. H. (1974). Acetoacetate. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, vol. 4, pp. 18401843 [.Bergmeyer, H. U., editor]. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minoto, H. & Suto, T. (1978). Technique for fractionation of bacteria in rumen microbial ecosystem. II. Attachment of bacteria isolated from bovine rumen to cellulose powder in vitro and elution of bacteria attached therefrom. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology 24, 116.Google Scholar
Mojonnier Bros. Co. (1925). Instruction Manual for Setting Up and Operating the Mojonnier Milk Tester. Bulletin no. 101. Chicago, IL: Mojannier Bros. Co.Google Scholar
Moore, J. H. & Christie, W. W. (1981). Lipid metabolism in the mammary gland of ruminant animals. In Lipid Metabolism in Ruminant Animals, pp. 227277 [Christie, W. W., editor]. Oxford: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (1978). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 5th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Nocek, J. E., Russell, J. B. & Fallon, J. B. (1988). Influence of chemical drying agent and surfactant on drying time and ruminal nutrient digestion of first-cutting alfalfa hay. Agronomy Journal 80, 525532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orpin, C. G. (1977). Studies on the defaunation of the ovine rumen using dioctyl sodium sulphosuccinate. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 43, 309318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute, Inc. (1985). SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 5. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Sigma Chemical Co. (1989). Sigma Diagnostics. St Louis. MO: Sigma Chemical Co.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. C. M. (1980). Colorimetric determination of phospholipids with ammonium ferrothiocyanate. Analytical Biochemistry 104, 1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Technicon Instruments Co. Ltd. (1977). Urea Nitrogen. Industrial Method no. 339–01. Tarrytown. NY: Technicon Instruments Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Uden, P., Colucci, P. E. & Van Soest, P. J. (1980). Investigation of chromium, cerium, and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 625632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varga, G. A. & Hoover, W. H. (1983). Rate and extent of neutral detergent fiber degradation of feedstuffs in situ. Journal of Dairy Science 66, 21092115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veira, D. M., Ivan, M. & Jui, P. Y. (1983). Rumen ciliate protozoa: Effects on digestion in the stomach of sheep. Journal of Dairy Science 66, 10151022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wako Chemicals USA Inc. (1989). Enzymatic. Analysis of Free Fatty Atids. Code no. 990–75401. Dallas, TX: Wako Chemicals USA Inc.Google Scholar
Williams, A. G. (1986). Rumen holotrich ciliate protozoa. Microbiological Reviews 50, 2549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, C. H., David, D. J. & Iismaa, O. (1962). The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 59, 381385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltrout, D. W. & Satter, L. D. (1972). Contribution of propionate to glucose synthesis in lactating and nonlactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 55, 307317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. E. & Curtis, M. V. (1976). Bloat in cattle. XIII. The action of surface-active chemicals on ciliated protozoa. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C.-M. J. & Varga, G. A. (1989). Effect of three concentrate feeding frequencies on rumen protozoa, rumen digesta kinetics, and milk yield in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72, 950957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed