Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:34:46.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of work level and dietary intake on sweat nitrogen losses in a hot climate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. S. Weiner
Affiliation:
MRC Environmental Physiology Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT
J. O. C. Willson
Affiliation:
MRC Environmental Physiology Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT
Hamad El-Neil
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Dar es Salaam
Erica F. Wheeler
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Nitrogen intakes, and N output in urine, faeces and sweat have been measured in six young Tanzanian men who were accustomed to a hot climate. The measurements were done while the subjects were receiving first a normal and then a low-N diet; and when they were performing moderate physical work, and had undergone a period of acclimatization.

2. When the subject were acclimatized and working on a normal diet, their sweat output increased, with a fall in its N concentration. Total sweat N loss increased from an average of 0.10 to 0.71 g/d.

3. The effect of the low-N diet was to decrease both the sweat N concentration, and the rate of increase of total N loss in sweat, as sweat volume increased.

4. It is estimated that maximum sweat N losses would not exceed 1 g/d on an adequate diet, or 0.5 g/d on a low-protein diet. Our results provide no basis for recommending extra protein allowances to cover sweat N losses for workers in tropical climates.

Type
Clinical and Human Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1972

References

Ashworth, A. & Harrower, A. D. B. (1967). Br. J. Nutr. 21, 833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, D. E., Kleeman, C. R. & Quinn, M. (1953). Fed. Proc. Fed. Am. Socs exp. Biol. 12, 11.Google Scholar
sCalloway, D. H., Odell, A. C. F. & Margen, S. (1971). J. Nutr. 101, 775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, K. J., Eddy, T. P., Hibbs, A., Stock, A. L. & Wheeler, E. F. (1971). Br. J. ind. Med. 28, 246.Google Scholar
Consolazio, C. F., Nelson, R. A., Matoush, L. O., Harding, R. S. & Canham, J. E. (1963). J. Nutr. 79, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darke, S. J. (1960). Br. J. Nutr. 14, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, R. H. (1967). In Cornparatiwe Methodology for Heat Tolerance Testing p.267 [Henschel, A., editors]. U.S. Public Health Service Rpt. RT-244.Google Scholar
Miller, D. S. & Payne, P. R. (1959). Br. J. Nutr. 13, 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. & Hamilton, T. S. (1949). J. biol. Chem. 178, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirbu, E. R., Margen, S. & Calloway, D. H. (1967). Am. J. clin. Nut.. 20, 1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (1965). Tech. Rep. Ser. Wld Hlth Org. no. 301.Google Scholar
Young, V. R. & Scrimshaw, N. S. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar