Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:49:20.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of glucose infusion on the plasma free amino acids in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

N. W. Offer ,
M. V. Tas ,
R. F. E. Axford  and
R. A. Evans
N. W. Offer
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Soil Science, Memorial Buildings, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, Wales
M. V. Tas
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Soil Science, Memorial Buildings, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, Wales
R. F. E. Axford
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Soil Science, Memorial Buildings, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, Wales
R. A. Evans
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Soil Science, Memorial Buildings, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, Wales
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Glucose in solution in saline, or saline alone, was administered to a group of twenty ewes during late pregnancy and again after lambing. Sequential blood samples were taken before and after the infusion and the concentration of plasma free amino acids was determined.

2. The effect of glucose was to reduce the concentrations of all amino acids except alanine. The reduction was greatest for tryptophan in the pregnant sheep, but this amino acid showed no significant change in the lactating animals.

3. An attempt to rank the amino acids on the basis of their response to glucose infusion indicated that, with the exception of tryptophan for the preparturient ewes, groups of essential amino acids could not be distinguished from each other. These groups were, for the preparturient sheep, valine, leucine, phenylalanine and isoleucine, and for the postparturient animals, isoleucine, lysine, methionine, valine and phenylalanine.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , November 1975 , pp. 375 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1975

References

Armstrong, D. G. & Annison, E. F. (1973). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 32, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, G. F. (1970). New Engl. J. Med. 282, 668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofford, O. B., Felts, P. W. & Lacy, W. W. (1964). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 117, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskeland, B., Pfander, W. H. & Preston, R. L. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 31, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenderson, C. L. & Bergen, W. G. (1972). J. Anim. Sci. 35, 896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, G. A. B., Hatfield, E. E. & Owens, F. N. (1974). J. Anim. Sci. 38, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, K. & Annison, E. F. (1972). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 31, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, G., Dawson, A. & Marks, V. (1968). Proc. Ass. clin. Biochem. 5, 42.Google Scholar
Munro, H. N. (1968). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 27, 1231.Google Scholar
Munro, H. N. & Thompson, N. S. T. (1953). Metabolism 2, 354.Google ScholarPubMed
Potter, E. L., Purser, D. B. & Bergen, W. G. (1972). J. Anim. Sci. 34, 660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, E. L., Purser, D. B. & Cline, J. H. (1968). J. Nutr. 95, 655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purser, D. B., Klopfenstein, T. J. & Cline, J. H. (1966). J. Nutr. 89, 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, G. T. & Hatfield, E. E. (1968). J. Nutr. 96, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, G. T., Hinds, F. C. & Hatfield, E. E. (1967). J. Nutr. 92, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, A. G. (1973). Studies on the utilization of amino acids in chicks. PhD Thesis, University of Wales.Google Scholar
Swendseid, M. E., Tuttle, S. C., Drenick, E. J., Jones, C. B. & Massey, F. J. (1967). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 20, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. J. (1970). Automation, Mechanisation and Data Handling in Microbiology, p. 107. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wakeling, A. E., Lewis, D. & Annison, E. F. (1970). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 29, 60A.Google Scholar