Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:01:49.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of feeding on the motility of the stomach and small intestine in the pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2008

Y. Ruckebusch  and
L. Bueno
Y. Ruckebusch
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physiologie-Pharmacodynamie, Ecole National Vétérinaire, 31076 Toulouse Cédex, France
L. Bueno
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physiologie-Pharmacodynamie, Ecole National Vétérinaire, 31076 Toulouse Cédex, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Electromyographical studies were made on the motility of the stomach and small intestine of five pigs when given a standard diet either ad lib., or as one or two meals/d. Recordings were made from electrodes placed chronically on the antrum, the duodenum and the jejuno-ileum, and a continuous 24 h recording was made every 2 d for a period of 4 weeks. A simple ‘T’-shaped cannula was positioned in the proximal duodenum in two of the pigs.

2. The basic pattern of activity of the small intestine was grouped in phases of irregular and regular activity characteristic of the myoelectric complex. This pattern recurred about eighteen times/d in fasting pigs, or in animals fed ad lib. and so eating frequent but small meals. When a myoelectric complex on the duodenum reached its regular ‘spiking’ phase, antral activity and passage of digesta ceased completely for a period (5–15 min) which varied according to the time elasped since the last meal.

3. In animals receiving one meal/d a postprandial pattern of activity lasted about 6 h. The proximal part of the intestine showed continuous activity with vigorous isolated or peristaltic spike bursts. The average number of myoelectric complexes was thirteen/d. When receiving two meals/d the postprandial pattern lasted for only 2–3 h, and approximately sixteen myoelectric complexes/d were recorded.

4. It is concluded that the extent of disruption of the basic intestinal motility pattern depends on the amount of food consumed per meal and subsequent release of nutrients.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , May 1976 , pp. 397 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1976

References

Buéno, L., Fioramonti, J. & Ruckebusch, Y. (1975). J. Physiol., Lond. 249, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buéno, L. & Ruckebusch, Y. (1975). C. r. Séanc. Soc. Biol. 169, 430.Google Scholar
Cooke, A. R. (1975). Gastroenterology 68, 804.Google Scholar
Hill, K. J. (1970). In Dukes' Physiology of Domestic Animals, p. 402 [Swanson, M. J., editor]. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Laplace, J. P. (1974). Recl Méd. vét. Éc. Alfort 150, 121.Google Scholar
Laplace, J. P. & Thomassone, R. (1970). Annls Zootech. 19, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, A. (1973). Annls Rech. vét. 4, 347.Google Scholar
Noakes, D. E., Hill, K. J., Freeman, C. P. & Annison, E. F. (1967). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 26, vi.Google Scholar
Plonait, H. (1974). Proc. 3rd int. Conf. Pig wet. Soc. Lyon Abstr., LIO.Google Scholar
Rérat, A. & Lougnon, J. (1963). Annls Biol. anim. Biochim. Biophys. 3, 29.Google Scholar
Ruckebusch, Y. (1970). J. Physiol., Lond. 210, 857.Google Scholar
Ruckebusch, Y. & Buéno, L. (1973). Br. J. Nutr. 30, 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruckebusch, M. & Fioramonti, J. (1975). C. r. Séanc. Soc. Biol. 169, 435.Google Scholar
Szurszewski, J. H. (1969). Am. J. Physiol. 217, 1757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar