Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:37:45.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of dilution of milk proteins with non-essential amino acids (L-alanine and L-glutamic acid) on nitrogen retention and biological value of the proteins in children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

V.A. Daniel
Affiliation:
Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore-2 a, India
T.R. Doraiswamy
Affiliation:
Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore-2 a, India
M. Swaminathan
Affiliation:
Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore-2 a, India
D. Rajalakshmi
Affiliation:
Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore-2 a, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The effect of addition of a mixture of two non-essential amino acids (NEA), namely alanine and glutamic acid, to milk proteins on nitrogen retention and the biological value of the proteins was determined in a group of six girls aged 10–11 years.

2. The mean daily intakes of milk protein by the children on three diets (1, 3 and 5 ) were 1.41, 1.10 and 0.70 g/kg body-weight. The quantities of NEA added daily to the three diets were 0.97, 0.49 and 0.97 g/kg body-weight respectively.

3. Addition of NEA did not bring about any significant increase in N retention in the children. The addition of NEA to milk proteins significantly decreased the biological value of the proteins.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1970

References

REFERENCES

Barton-wright, E. C. (1952). Microbiological Assay of the Vitamin B Complex and Amino Acids. London: Issac Pitman and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Block, R. J. & Mitchell, H. H. (1946). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 16, 249.Google Scholar
Daniel, V. A., Desai, B. L. M., Venkat Rao, S., Swaminathan, M. & Parpia, H. A. B. (1968). J. Fd Sci. 33, 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (1965). F.A.O. Nutr. Mtg Rep. Ser. no. 37.Google Scholar
Murthy, H. B. N., Swaminathan, M. & Subrahmanyan, V. (1954). Br. J. Nutr. 8, 11..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrimshaw, N. S., Bressani, R., Behar, M. & Viteri, F. (1958). J. Nutr. 66, 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrimshaw, N. S., Young, V. R., Haung, P. C., Thanangkul, O. & Cholakos, B. V. (1969). J. Nutr. 98, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyderman, S. E., Holt, L. E., Dancis, J., Roitman, E., Boyer, A. & Balis, M. E. (1962). J. Nutr. 78, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spies, J. R. (1950). Analyt. Chem. 22, 1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaminathan, M. (1964). J. Nutr. Dietet. 1, 59.Google Scholar
Swaminathan, M. (1967). In Newer Methods of Nutritional Biochemistry Vol. 3, p. 197 [Albanese, A. A., editor]. New York: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Swaminathan, M. & Daniel, V. A. (1968). J. Nutr. Dietet. 5, 164.Google Scholar
Tasker, P. K., Doraiswamy, T. R., Narayanarao, M., Swaminathan, M., Sreenivasan, A. & Subrahmanyan, V. (1962). Br. J. Nutr. 16, 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, W. M. (1959). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 18, 1125.Google Scholar