Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:10:56.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of age, weight and adequacy of zinc intake on the balance between alkaline ribonuclease and ribonuclease inhibitor in various tissues of the rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

J. K. Chesters  and
Marie Will
J. K. Chesters
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Marie Will
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Deficiency of zinc inhibits growth and also increases the activity of alkaline ribonuclease in certain tissues of the rat (Prasad & Oberleas, 1973). Zn could influence ribonuclease activity by direct effects on the enzyme or its natural inhibitor, or non-specifically as occurs when growth rate is affected by various other factors. These possibilities were studied.

2. Alkaline ribonuclease was shown to be inhibited by Zn in vitro, but the concentrations of Zn required were so high that the enzyme was probably not directly affected by changes in tissue Zn concentration caused by dietary deficiency.

3. At lower concentrations, Zn added in vitro increased the activity of alkaline ribonuclease in tissue homogenates probably by inactivating the inhibitor of the enzyme.

4. Age, weight and particularly food restriction caused tissue-specific alterations of ribonuclease and ribonuclease inhibitor concentrations in liver, kidney, oesophagus, testis and thymus.

5. The ribonuclease activities in liver, kidney and testis of Zn-deficient rats were unaltered in comparison with those of pair-fed rats. In thymus, which decreased in weight in the Zn-deficient animals, there was a concomitant increase in ribonuclease activity, but in oesophagus, the deficiency reduced the activity of ribonuclease.

6. The effects of Zn deficiency upon alkaline ribonuclease and its inhibitor are probably secondary consequences of reductions in food intake or growth.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , March 1978 , pp. 375 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1978

References

REFERENCES

Alvares, O. F. & Meyer, J. (1973). J. oral Path. 2, 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buri, J. F., Merlin, M. & Vaillant, R. (1972). Annls Recherch. veterin. 3, 109.Google Scholar
Chesters, J. K. (1975). Biochem. J. 150, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, N. T. (1974). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 33, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichhorn, G. L., Clarke, P. & Tarien, E. (1969). J. biol. Chem. 244, 937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fell, B. F., Leigh, L. C. & Williams, R. B. (1973). Res. vet. Sci. 14, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, W. E. & Sells, B. H. (1971). Endocrinology 89, 1120.Google Scholar
Kraft, N. & Shortman, K. (1970 a). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 23, 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, N. & Shortman, K. (1970 b). Biochim. biophys. Acta 217, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loening, U. E. (1969). Biochem. J. 113, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). J. biol. Chem. 193, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macapinlac, M. P., Pearson, W. N., Barney, G. H. & Darby, W. J. (1968). J. Nutr. 95, 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. F., Quarterman, J., Chesters, J. K., Williams, R. B. & Dalgarno, A. C. (1969). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 22, 1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, A. S. & Oberleas, D. (1973). J. Lab. clin. Med. 82, 461.Google Scholar
Quarterman, J., Williams, R. B. & Humphries, W. R. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, J. (1956). Biochim. biophys. Acta 21, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shortman, K. (1961). Biochim. biophys. Acta 51, 37.Google Scholar
Somers, M. & Underwood, E. J. (1969). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 22, 1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. B. & Mills, C. F. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar