Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T17:14:49.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of addition of linoleic acid on food intake regulation in linoleic acid tasters and linoleic acid non-tasters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2007

Marleen M. J. W. Kamphuis ,
Wim H. M. Saris  and
Margriet S. Westerterp-Plantenga
Marleen M. J. W. Kamphuis*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Maastrict University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastrict, The Netherlands
Wim H. M. Saris
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Maastrict University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastrict, The Netherlands
Margriet S. Westerterp-Plantenga
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Maastrict University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastrict, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Marleen M. J. W. Kamphuis, fax +31 43 367 0976, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a randomised, single blind, placebo-controlled crossover design study, we investigated whether healthy, non-smoking, dietary unrestrained women (n 24), divided into linoleic acid tasters (LAT, n 14) and linoleic acid non-tasters (LANT, n 10), differed in food intake regulation when linoleic acid was added to ice creams. The determination of subjects as LAT or LANT was done using a 10μM-linoleic acid solution. The ice creams were characterised by the subjects and a taste perception test using the triangle test was conducted three times. Food intake and appetite were measured using the universal eating monitor. LAT and LANT did not differ in characterisation or in taste perception of the ice creams, even though LAT were able to increase their ability to discriminate between the ice cream with linoleic acid from the one containing oleic acid. No effect of LAT status or type of ice cream was found for hedonic value of the ice creams. Linoleic acid taster status did affect food intake regulation. For LAT, but not LANT, the amount eaten was a function of Δsatiety. Subjects ate by weight of food and not by energy content. In conclusion, differences in food intake regulation were seen between LAT and LANT, in that the amount eaten by LAT was a function of Δsatiety, but was not for LANT.

Keywords

Linoleic acidFat perceptionFood intake regulationSatietyMacronutrientsEnergy density
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , July 2003 , pp. 199 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2003

References

Bartoshuk, LM, Duffy, VB & Miller, IJ (1994) PTC/PROP tasting: anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiol Behav 56, 1165–1171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blundell, JE, Cotton, JR, Delargy, H, et al. (1995) The fat paradox: fat-induced satiety signals versus high fat overconsumption. Int J Obes 19, 832–835Google ScholarPubMed
Blundell, JE & MacDiarmid, JI (1997) Fat as a risk factor for overconsumption: satiation, satiety, and patterns of eating. J Am Diet Assoc 97, S63–S69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drewnowski, A (1998) Energy density, palatability, and satiety: implications for weight control. Nutr Rev 56, 347–353CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firestein, S (2000) The good taste of genomics. Nature 404, 552–553CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folch, J, Lees, M & Stanley, GHS (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226, 497–509CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, S, Mutuma, S, Francis, J, Read, N & Meijer, G (1998) The effect of fatty composition on intestinal satiety in man. Int J Obes 22, 582.Google Scholar
French, SJ (1999) The effects of specific nutrients on the regulation of feeding behaviour in human subjects. Proc Nutr Soc 58, 533–593CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbertson, TA (1998) Gustatory mechanisms for the detection of fat. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8, 447–452CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbertson, TA, Fontenot, T, Liu, L, Zhang, H & Monroe, WT (1997) Fatty acid modulation of K+ channels in taste receptor cells: gustatory cues for dietary fat. Am J Physiol 272, C1203–C1210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbertson, TA, Kim, I & Liu, L(eds) (1998 a) Sensory cues for dietary fat: implications for macronutrient preferences. In Progress of Obesity Research. pp 167–171Eastleigh: John Libbey & Company Ltd.Google Scholar
Gilbertson, TA, Liu, L, York, DA & Bray, GA (1998) Dietary fat preferences are inversely correlated with peripheral gustatory fatty acid sensitivity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 855, 165–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamosh, M & Burns, WA (1977) Lipolytic activity of human lingual glands (Ebner). Lab Invest 37, 603–608.Google ScholarPubMed
Hamosh, M, Klaeveman, HL, Wolf, RO & Scow, RO (1975) Pharyngeal lipase and digestion of dietary triglyceride in man. J Clin Invest 55, 908–913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herman, CP & Polivy, J (1980) Restrained eating. In Obesity. pp 208–225 [Stunkard, AJ, editor]. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Hetherington, MM (1996) Sensory-specific satiety and its importance in meal termination. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 20, 113–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaluzny, MA, Duncan, LA, Merrit, MV & Epps, DE (1985) Rapid separation of lipid classes in high yield and purity using bonded phase columns. J Lip Res 26, 135–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamphuis, MMJW, Westerterp-Plantenga, MS & Saris, WHM (2001) Fat specific satiety in humans for fat high in linoleic acid versus fat high in oleic acid. Eur J Clin Nutr 55, 499–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepage, G & Roy, CC (1986) Direct transesterification of all classes of lipids in a one-step reaction. J Lip Res 27, 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, C, Delargy, H, Smith, F & Blundell, J (1997) Does the degree of saturation of fatty acids affect post-ingestive satiety?. Int J Obes 21, S35.Google Scholar
Lissner, L, Levitsky, DA, Strupp, BJ, Kalkwarf, HJ & Roe, DA (1987) Dietary fat and the regulation of energy intake in human subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 46, 886–892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meilgaard, M, Civille, GV & Carr, BT (1991) In Sensory Evaluation Techniques, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Nasser, JA, Chou, CJ, Kissileff, HR, Boozer, CN & Pi-Sunyer, FX (1999) PROP taster status and the ability to detect the presence of added conjugated linoleic acid in high fat ice cream. Obes Res 7, 87S.Google Scholar
Rolls, BJ (1986) Sensory-specific satiety. Nutr Rev 44, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spielman, AI, D'Abundo, S, Field, RB & Schmale, H (1993) Protein analysis of human von Ebner saliva and a method for its collection from the foliate papillae. J Dent Res 72, 1331–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, RJ, Ritz, P, Coward, WA & Prentice, AM (1995) Covert manipulation of the ratio of dietary fat to carbohydrate and energy density: effect on food intake and energy balance in free-living men eating ad libitum. Am J Clin Nutr 62, 330–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stunkard, AJ & Messick, S (1985) The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition, and hunger. J Psychosom Res 29, 71–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tepper, BJ (1999) Does genetic taste sensitivity to PROP influence food preferences and body weight?. Appetite 32, 422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tepper, BJ & Nurse, RJ (1997) Fat perception is related to PROP taster status. Physiol Behav 61, 949–954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tepper, BJ & Nurse, RJ (1998) PROP taster status is related to fat perception and preference. Ann N Y Acad Sci 30, 802–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerterp-Plantenga, MS (2000) Eating behaviour in humans, characterized by cumulative food intake curves – a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24, 239–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westerterp-Plantenga, MS (2001) Analysis of energy density of food in relation to energy intake regulation in human subjects. Br J Nutr 85, 351–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westerterp-Plantenga, MS, Rolland, V, Wilson, SAJ & Westerterp, KR (1999) Satiety related to 24h diet-induced thermogenesis during high protein/carbohydrate vs high fat diets measured in a respiration chamber. Eur J Clin Nutr 53, 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yackinous, C & Guinard, JX (2001) Relation between PROP taster status and fat perception, touch, and olfaction. Physiol Behav 72, 427–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed