Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:16:13.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early life undernutrition in rats

3. Motor performance in adulthood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2009

J. L. Smart  and
K. S. Bedi
J. L. Smart
Affiliation:
Department of Child Health, University of Manchester, The Medical School, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT
K. S. Bedi
Affiliation:
Department of Child Health, University of Manchester, The Medical School, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A detailed investigation was made of the motor performance of rats which had impaired cerebellar and muscular growth resulting from early-life undernutrition.

2. Developing rats were growth-retarded by underfeeding their mothers during pregnancy and lactation. They were fed ad lib. from 25 d of age.

3. Adult male previously-undernourished (PU) and well-fed control rats were given tests of motor behaviour commencing at 5 months of age. They were required to run backwards to maintain their position on a revolving drum. Aspects of the test situation were varied systematically: visual environment, interval between trials, test duration and drum speed.

4. PU rats had a 29% body-weight deficit compared with controls at 5 months.

5. There was no evidence of impaired motor performance by the PU rats under any of the test conditions.

Type
Papers of direct reference to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , May 1982 , pp. 439 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1982

References

Abbey, H. & Howard, E. (1973). Devl Psychobiol. 6, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adlard, B. P. F., Dobbing, J. & Smart, J. L. (1973). Biol. Neonate 23, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, J., Anderson, W. J. & Strop, M. (1971). Physiol. Behav. 7, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedi, K. S., Birzgalis, A. R., Mahon, M., Smart, J. L. & Wareham, A. C. (1982). Br. J. Nutr. 47, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, H. P., Lindsley, W. F. B. & O'Brien, D. (1969). Nature, Lond. 221, 554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culley, W. J. & Lineberger, R. O. (1968). J. Nutr. 96, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galler, J. R. & Turkewitz, G. (1977). Physiol. Behav. 19, 697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, H. A. (1968). Physiol. Behav. 3, 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, T. C. & Howells, K. F. (1978). Brain Res. 157, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, T. C., Howells, K. F. & Piggott, S. M. (1979). Behav. Neurol Biol. 25, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, A., Dobbing, J., Adlard, B. P. F. & Smart, J. L. (1976). Biol. Neonate 28, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, A., Smart, J. L. & Dobbing, J. (1975). Brain Res. 83, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheirer, C. J., Ray, W. S. & Hare, N. (1976). Biometrics 32, 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seamer, J. & Peto, S. (1969). Lab. Anim. 3, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slob, A. K., Snow, C. E. & de Natris-Mathot, E. (1973). Devl Psychobiol. 6, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, J. L., Dobbing, J., Adlard, B. P. F., Lynch, A. & Sands, J. (1973). J. Nutr. 103, 1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wareham, A. C., Mahon, M., Bedi, K. S. & Smart, J. L. (1982). Br. J. Nutr. 47, 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar