Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:39:17.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Down-regulation of hypothalamic pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) expression after weaning is associated with hyperphagia-induced obesity in JCR rats overexpressing neuropeptide Y

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2013

Abdoulaye Diané
Affiliation:
Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases Laboratory, Alberta Institute for Human Nutrition, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
W. David Pierce*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Alberta, H.M Tory Building, Edmonton, Canada, ABT6G 2H4
James C. Russell
Affiliation:
Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases Laboratory, Alberta Institute for Human Nutrition, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
C. Donald Heth
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Donna F. Vine
Affiliation:
Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases Laboratory, Alberta Institute for Human Nutrition, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Denis Richard
Affiliation:
Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de l'Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
Spencer D. Proctor
Affiliation:
Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases Laboratory, Alberta Institute for Human Nutrition, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
*
*Corresponding author: W. D. Pierce, fax +1 780 492 7196, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We hypothesised that hypothalamic feeding-related neuropeptides are differentially expressed in obese-prone and lean-prone rats and trigger overeating-induced obesity. To test this hypothesis, in the present study, we measured energy balance and hypothalamic neuropeptide Y (NPY) and pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) mRNA expressions in male JCR:LA-cp rats. We compared, in independent cohorts, free-feeding obese-prone (Obese-FF) and lean-prone (Lean-FF) rats at pre-weaning (10 d old), weaning (21–25 d old) and early adulthood (8–12 weeks). A group of Obese-pair-feeding (PF) rats pair-fed to the Lean-FF rats was included in the adult cohort. The body weights of 10-d-old Obese-FF and Lean-FF pups were not significantly different. However, when the pups were shifted from dams' milk to solid food (weaning), the obese-prone rats exhibited more energy intake over the days than the lean-prone rats and higher body and fat pad weights and fasting plasma glucose, leptin, insulin and lipid levels. These differences were consistent with higher energy consumption and lower energy expenditure. In the young adult cohort, the differences between the Obese-FF and Lean-FF rats became more pronounced, yielding significant age effects on most of the parameters of the metabolic syndrome, which were reduced in the Obese-PF rats. The obese-prone rats displayed higher NPY expression than the lean-prone rats at pre-weaning and weaning, and the expression levels did not differ by age. In contrast, POMC expression exhibited significant age-by-genotype differences. At pre-weaning, there was no genotype difference in POMC expression, but in the weanling cohort, obese-prone pups exhibited lower POMC expression than the lean-prone rats. This genotype difference became more pronounced at adulthood. Overall, the development of hyperphagia-induced obesity in obese-prone JCR rats is related to POMC expression down-regulation in the presence of established NPY overexpression.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

Over the last few decades, the incidence of paediatric obesity has increased in both developing and developed countries( Reference Lobstein, Baur and Uauy 1 , Reference Popkin, Conde and Hou 2 ). Obesity is characterised by an imbalance between energy intake and energy expenditure, and in children, it is associated with acute and chronic health risks in later life, including CVD( Reference Must and Anderson 3 ) and type 2 diabetes( Reference Fagot-Campagna, Pettitt and Engelgau 4 ). Given the prevalence of obesity, substantial research has been directed at the underlying mechanisms in an effort to discover effective long-term treatment for excessive weight gain and associated chronic disease risk( Reference Flynn, McNeil and Maloff 5 ). The evidence suggests that genetic differences may help to explain the within-population variation in BMI( Reference Schousboe, Visscher and Erbas 6 ), together with specific environmental factors( Reference Qi and Cho 7 ). In this regard, the use of GM rodent models of obesity aids the investigation of underlying mechanisms.

Animal models of obesity based on mutations in leptin signalling, either at the peptide level (ob/ob mouse) or at the receptor level (db/db mouse and fa/fa and cp/cp rats)( Reference Russell and Proctor 8 ), allow investigations into the mechanisms regulating energy balance. Leptin, encoded by the ob gene, is an important mediator of feeding behaviour and energy homeostasis( Reference Bates and Myers 9 ). Leptin acts on the hypothalamic regions involved in energy homeostasis, through the leptin receptor. The effects of leptin on energy balance involve the orexigenic neuropeptide Y (NPY) and agouti-related protein as well as anorexigenic neuropeptides such as pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) and cocaine–amphetamine-regulated transcript( Reference Ingvartsen and Boisclair 10 ).

The JCR:LA-cp rat has the autosomal recessive corpulence (cp) gene, a nonsense mutation in the ObR gene resulting in a premature stop codon in the extracellular domain of the leptin receptor gene( Reference Wu-Peng, Chua and Okada 11 ). Thus, all isoforms of the receptor are affected, leading to a total absence of functional leptin receptors( Reference Takaya, Ogawa and Hiraoka 12 ). Rats that are heterozygous for the cp trait (+/?) are lean-prone, while those that are homozygous (cp/cp) display characteristics observed in human obesity – including hyperphagia, hyperinsulinaemia, hyperlipidaemia and atherosclerosis( Reference Russell and Proctor 8 , Reference Brindley and Russell 13 ). These metabolic alterations are well documented in adult rats( Reference Russell and Proctor 8 ). However, the early onset of these dysfunctions has not been described in the JCR strain.

Epidemiological studies have shown that obesity and associated metabolic complications in adult humans originate, at least in part, early in postnatal life( Reference Breier, Vickers and Ikenasio 14 ). Consistently, studies in rodents have indicated that prenatal and neonatal nutritional environments contribute to adult obesity and related metabolic dysfunctions, which can be further influenced by the post-weaning dietary environment( Reference Page, Malik and Ripple 15 , Reference Kenasio-Thorpe, Breier and Vickers 16 ) and genetic background( Reference Levin and Govek 17 ). However, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown.

Nutritional environment during early development has been shown to alter the expression of genes critical to the regulation of energy homeostasis( Reference McMillen, Adam and Mühlhäusler 18 ). One possibility is that feeding-related neuropeptide genes are altered in obese-prone animals, resulting in the early onset of homeostatic imbalance and predisposition to the development of obesity later in life. Furthermore, studies in rodents indicate that the appetite-regulatory network in the hypothalamus, mostly in the arcuate nucleus (ARC), does not fully develop until the third postnatal week( Reference Grove and Smith 19 ), corresponding to the weaning period. Disruption of leptin signalling would be expected to up-regulate NPY expression, which in turn inhibits POMC expression in the ARC( Reference Williams, Bing and Cai 20 ), resulting in obesity( Reference Chua, Chung and Wu-Peng 21 ). Beck et al. ( Reference Beck, Burlet and Bazin 22 ) found that, at both post-weaning and adult ages, Zucker (fa/fa) rats display higher NPY and lower POMC expressions in the ARC compared with their lean counterparts, while no difference is observed between the two genotypes during the pre-weaning or suckling period. However, Zucker (fa/fa) rats have a missense mutation in the leptin receptor gene, which diminishes but not completely eliminates the response to leptin( Reference Yamashita, Murakami and Iida 23 ). As has been noted, JCR rats have a nonsense mutation in the leptin receptor, and it is unclear whether the alterations in NPY and POMC expressions are established before or after weaning in these rats.

In the present study, we hypothesised that in the ARC NPY mRNA levels would be elevated and POMC mRNA levels reduced before weaning in JCR obese-prone pups compared with those in lean-prone littermates. These differences in pre-weanling pups would be exacerbated by weaning and then maintained until adulthood. We also hypothesised that pair-feeding-induced energy restriction( Reference Russell, Proctor and Kelly 24 ) would affect feeding-related neuropeptides.

Materials and methods

Animals

Separate cohorts of pre-weanling (10 d old; twelve obese-prone cp/cp and twelve lean-prone +/?), weanling (3 weeks old; eight obese-prone cp/cp and eight lean-prone +/?) and young adult (8 weeks old; sixteen obese cp/cp and eight lean +/?) male JCR:LA-cp rats were obtained from the breeding colony at the University of Alberta( Reference Russell and Proctor 8 ). The rats were housed individually in polycarbonate cages (47 cm × 27 cm × 20 cm) with sterile wood chip bedding and placed under a reversed 12 h light–12 h dark cycle (lights on: 18.00–06.00 hours). Throughout the experiments, the rats had free access to water and were fed as outlined in the experimental procedures section. All food was laboratory chow (LabDiet™ 5010, PMI Nutrition International, Inc.; metabolisable energy = 14·31 kJ/g (3·42 kcal/g)). Body weight (g) and food intake (g) measurements were taken daily. The care and use of animals were in accordance with the Guidelines of the Canadian Council of Animal Care and subject to prior review and approval by the Animal Care and Use Committee: Health Sciences, University of Alberta.

Experimental procedures

The experiments were conducted in three independent batches of lean-prone and obese-prone rats of different ages. For the young adult (8-week-old) cohort, obese-prone (cp/cp) rats were matched for body weights and randomly assigned to the free-feeding (Obese-FF, n 8) or the pair-feeding (Obese-PF, n 8) group. Each Obese-PF rat was matched to a lean free-feeding (Lean-FF) littermate and given the same amount of food daily (LabDiet™ chow 5010; LabDiet). Food intake was measured by subtracting the amount of food uneaten from the fixed amount given to the rat. Although spillage was minimal, when it did occur, the food lost from the cages was collected and added to the total not consumed. Subsequently, food intake was converted to energy (food (g) × 14·31 kJ/g (3·42 kcal/g)), yielding a measure of daily energy consumption. After 4 weeks of feeding, the young adult rats (now 12 weeks old) were transferred to calorimetric chambers for whole-body energy expenditure measurements. Rats belonging to the weanling cohort (21 d old) were assigned to the Obese-FF (n 8) and Lean-FF (n 8) groups on day 22 when obese-prone and lean-prone rats are distinguishable( Reference Brindley and Russell 13 ) and transferred to calorimetric chambers for energy expenditure assessment before being killed on day 25. Pre-weanling or suckling pups (10 d old) were killed immediately without being subjected to whole-body indirect calorimetry; using sense 5′-ATGAATGCTGCAGTC-3′ and antisense 5′-AAGGTTCTTCCATTCAAT-3′ primers, genotyping was carried out using tissue samples collected from the tip of the tail during brain tissue collection, as obese-prone and lean-prone rats are indistinguishable at this age.

Energy expenditure

Whole-body energy expenditure was measured by indirect calorimetry using a CLAMS system (Columbus Instruments) for 24 h after a 24 h habituation period, following the manufacturer's instructions. Light and feeding conditions were kept the same as those described above.

Post-mortem analysis

The rats were killed under anaesthesia with isoflurane after an overnight fast, except the pre-weanling rats, which were killed without fasting. Blood was collected by cardiac puncture. Plasma samples were stored at − 80°C until analysis. The rats were immediately perfused intracardially with ice-cold isotonic saline: the brain was removed. Liver mass, lean body mass and white adipose tissue (WAT) mass, the sum of the mass of retroperitoneal, epididymal and subcutaneous depots dissected and weighed, are expressed as a percentage of total body weight.

NPY mRNA expression in hypothalamic arcuate nucleus

Neuropeptide (NPY and POMC) mRNA in the entire ARC were assessed by in situ hybridisation as described by Doyon et al. ( Reference Doyon, Denis and Baraboi 25 ). The ARC was chosen due to its proximity to the peripheral blood stream and strong responsiveness to peripheral cues to regulate energy balance. The brain tissues were prepared as described previously( Reference Poulin and Timofeeva 26 ).

Plasma biochemical analysis

Total plasma cholesterol and TAG assay kits were obtained from Wako USA. Plasma glucose concentration was determined using the glucose oxidase method (Diagnostic Chemical Limited). Insulin and leptin concentrations were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent kits for rodents (insulin kit, Mercodia AB, and leptin kit, LINCO Research). Plasma corticosterone concentration was measured using Milliplex Map (Millipore Corporation).

Statistical analysis

Results are presented as means with their standard errors and were plotted using SigmaPlot v11 (Systat Software, Inc.). We used two-way ANOVA to test age-by-genotype effects along with follow-up tests using one-way ANOVA for comparison of the three adult groups with the post hoc Bonferroni test for pairwise comparison of means. Student's t test was used to determine statistical differences between the obese and lean groups. All tests and comparisons with P <0·05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Energy intake and body weight

Fig. 1 shows body weight (Fig. 1(a)), energy intake (Fig. 1(b)) and energy conversion efficiency (Fig. 1(c)) for the free-feeding weanling JCR rats by genotype. The body weights of the Obese-FF and Lean-FF groups were not significantly different on the day of weaning; furthermore, the body weights of pups in the pre-weanling cohort did not differ significantly by genotype at 10 d of age (Table 1). These findings indicate that lean-prone and obese-prone pups have similar body weights on being shifted to dams' milk during the suckling period.

Fig. 1 Effect of genotype on the (a) body weight, (b) energy intake (food consumption expressed as kJ/d) and (c) energy efficiency (EFF, efficiency of conversion to body mass) of weanling JCR:LA-cp rats for three post-weaning days. Values were significantly different from those of the lean-prone (+/?) rats: * P< 0·05; ** P< 0·01; *** P< 0·001. , Lean free-feeding; , obese free-feeding.

Table 1 Physiological and biochemical measures in pre-weanling, weanling and adult rats by feeding groups, lean-free-fed (FF), obese-FF and obese-pair-fed (PF)* (Mean values with their standard errors, n 8 per group)

ND, not determined; WAT, white adipose tissue.

a,b,c,d,eMean values within a row with unlike superscript letters (corresponding to the results from follow-up tests using one-way ANOVA with post hoc comparisons and independent t tests) were significantly different within each age group (P< 0·05).

* The two-way ANOVA with age and genotype (lean v. obese) as factors were used to detect main and interaction effects. Post hoc comparisons with Bonferroni correction were used to detect differences between the groups.

Weanling rats shifted from dams' milk to chow diet exhibited significantly higher body weights over days 22–25 in the Obese-FF group than in the Lean-FF group (P< 0·01; Fig. 1(a)). The energy intake of the Obese-FF group was also higher than that of the Lean-FF group over the post-weaning period (P< 0·001; Fig. 1(b)), but the rate of increase in body weight (regression slopes, Obese-FF group: 6·56 (se 0·8) g/d; Lean-FF group: 5·02 (se 0·72) g/d) was not significantly different. This observation may be related to the lower energy efficiency (E EFF = body weight gain (g)/total energy (kJ)) in the Obese-FF rats (Fig. 1(c)). The E EFF was similar in the two genotypes after weaning (day 21). Thereafter, the Lean-FF rats maintained a constant E EFF, while the Obese-FF rats exhibited a significant decrease in E EFF compared with the Lean-FF rats on days 22 and 23 after weaning (P< 0·05 and P< 0·01, respectively).

In the young adult cohort, body weight increased significantly in the three groups during the 4-week feeding period (P< 0·001). Body weight increased significantly in the Obese-FF rats than in the Lean-FF rats (P< 0·001) or the Obese-PF rats (P< 0·001; Fig. 2(a)). From 10 to 12 weeks of age, weight gain in the Obese-FF rats (30·7 (se 7·4) g/week) was nearly double that in the Lean-FF rats (16·6 (se 2·8) g/week) and 30 % greater than that in the Obese-PF group (20·3 (se 4·4) g/week). The Obese-FF rats also maintained significantly higher daily energy intake compared with the Lean-FF or Obese-PF rats (P< 0·01; Fig. 2(b)). The mean daily energy intake was constant in the Lean-FF rats over the 4-week feeding period, while that in the Obese-FF rats decreased between weeks 10 and 11 (P< 0·01) and then remained constant. Over 4 weeks of feeding, total body weight gain in the Obese-PF rats (44·0 (se 3·8) g) was nearly 50 % less than that in the Lean-FF group (87·3 (se 3·1) g) (P< 0·001). Thus, pair-feeding obese-prone rats to lean-prone rats resulted in a substantial reduction in daily body weight gain.

Fig. 2 Effect of feeding groups (lean-prone (+/?)-free-fed (Lean-FF, ), obese-prone (cp/cp)-free-fed () and obese-prone (cp/cp)-pair-fed (Obese-PF, )) on the (a) body weight, (b) energy intake (food consumption expressed as kJ/d) and (c) energy efficiency (efficiency of conversion to body mass) of JCR:LA-cp rats from 8 to 12 weeks of age (young adults). Statistical differences among the experimental groups are described in the Results section. Note that the variance in energy intake (b) of the Lean-FF and Obese-PF rats was smaller than the size of the symbols and thus not readily visible in the figure. Values were significantly different from those of the Lean-FF rats: * P< 0·05; ** P< 0·01; *** P< 0·001. Values were significantly different from those of the Obese-PF rats: ††P< 0·01; ††† P< 0·001.

In the young adult cohort, the E EFF decreased during weeks 8–10 in the Obese-FF and Lean-FF rats (overall rate of change − 33·5 (se 5·9) and − 36·4 (se 5·9) mg/kJ per d ( − 8·0 (se 1·4) and − 8·7 (se 1·4) mg/kcal per d), respectively, P< 0·001). The Obese-PF rats exhibited markedly lower E EFF than the Obese-FF or Lean-FF rats (P= 0·01) on the 1st day of pair-feeding, mirrored by a loss in body weight induced by the initiation of pair-feeding (Fig. 2(c)).

Body composition and plasma biochemical parameters

In the pre-weanling cohort, despite the same body weight, the percentage of total WAT mass was significantly higher in the obese-prone rats than in the lean-prone rats, with no significant difference being observed in the percentage of lean body mass between the two genotypes (Table 1). In the weanling cohort, the obese-prone rats also had a higher percentage of WAT mass than the lean-prone group (P< 0·001) and a lower percentage of lean body mass (P< 0·001).

In the young adult cohort, the percentages of liver mass and total WAT mass were significantly higher in the Obese-FF rats than in their Lean-FF littermates (P< 0·01); also, the Obese-FF rats had significantly lower lean body mass than the lean-prone rats (P< 0·001) (Table 1). The Obese-PF rats had significantly lower total WAT mass (P< 0·001) than the Obese-FF rats, but lean body mass did not differ significantly in both the groups. The two-way ANOVA of age group ×  genotype revealed a significant main effect of age group on the percentage of total fat mass and lean body mass (P< 0·001), indicating that the pre-weanling rats had higher percentages of fat mass and lean body mass than the weanling rats. However, the weanling cohort had lower percentages of fat mass (2·21 (se 0·17)) and lean mass (34·62 (se 0·53)) than the young adult rats (12·54 (se 0·37) and 39·87 (se 0·48)). Thus, the percentage of fat mass decreased between the pre-weaning and weaning groups, but increased in the young adult cohort.

Plasma total cholesterol, TAG and insulin concentrations were significantly lower in the lean-prone rats than in the obese-prone rats, across the age cohorts (Table 1; P< 0·05). Pair-feeding for a period of 4 weeks significantly decreased plasma total cholesterol and TAG concentrations in young adult Obese-PF rats compared with those in the Obese-FF rats (P< 0·05); however, no effect was observed for plasma glucose and insulin concentrations (Table 1).

Interestingly, plasma corticosterone concentrations at the weanling age were significantly higher in the Lean-FF rats than in the Obese-FF rats (Table 1, P< 0·05), and this difference was reversed in young adult rats, as the Obese-FF rats had higher concentrations than the Lean-FF rats (P< 0·05).

Energy expenditure

Fig. 3 shows the energy expenditure of rats, either at weaning or young adult ages. Fig. 3(a) shows the RER (relative exchange ratio or RQ), an index of what macronutrients are being preferentially metabolised to produce energy. At both the ages, RER was significantly lower in the Lean-FF rats than in the Obese-FF rats, regardless of the light cycle phase (P< 0·05). RER values did not differ significantly between the Obese-FF and Obese-PF young adult rats. Weanling rats of both the genotypes expended more energy than rats in the young adult cohort (P< 0·05; Fig. 3(b)). Fig. 3(b) shows that heat production was higher in the Lean-FF rats than in the Obese-FF rats during both the light and dark phases (P< 0·05) at both the ages. The Obese-PF rats exhibited significantly greater heat production than the Obese-FF rats only during the dark phase (P< 0·05; Fig. 3(b)). Locomotor activity (Fig. 3(c)) differed by genotype; in the weanling cohort, the Lean-FF rats were more active than the Obese-FF rats only in the dark phase (P< 0·05), and in the young adult cohort, the Lean-FF rats were more active than the Obese-FF rats during both the phases of the diurnal cycle. In the young adult cohort, the Obese-PF group exhibited significantly greater total activity than the Obese-FF rats only in the dark phase (P< 0·05, Fig. 3(b)).

Fig. 3 Effect of feeding groups (lean-prone (+/?)-free-fed (Lean-FF, □), obese-prone (cp/cp)-free-fed (Obese-FF, ■) and obese-prone (cp/cp)-pair-fed ()) on RER, heat production (prod) and relative activity in the light and dark phases for weanling and 12-week-old JCR:LA-cp rats. Values were significantly different from those of Lean-FF rats: * P< 0·05; ** P< 0·01; *** P< 0·001. † Values were significantly different from those of the Obese-FF rats (P< 0·05).

Arcuate nucleus neuropeptide mRNA expression and plasma leptin concentrations

In Fig. 4(a) and (b), neuropeptide expression levels in the ARC are shown. In the pre-weanling cohort, the lean-prone rats displayed lower NPY expression than the obese-prone rats (P< 0·05). POMC expression was not statistically different between the genotypes. In the weanling cohort, the Lean-FF rats also exhibited lower NPY mRNA expression than the Obese-FF rats. In the weanling cohort, POMC expression levels were significantly higher in the lean-prone rats than in the obese-prone rats (P< 0·05). In the young adult cohort, NPY mRNA expression levels tended to be higher in the Obese-FF rats than in the Lean-FF rats, but this difference was not statistically significant (P= 0·11). In the young adult cohort, POMC expression in the Obese-FF and Obese-PF rats was significantly lower than that in the Lean-FF rats. Pair-feeding for a period of 4 weeks significantly increased NPY expression in the obese-prone rats (Obese-FF v. Obese-PF; P< 0·001). There was no difference in POMC expression between the Obese-PF and Obese-FF rats. In the lean-prone rats as well as in the obese-prone rats, NPY expression did not differ significantly by age, but POMC expression exhibited an age-dependent increase in the lean-prone rats (P< 0·05), while it displayed an age-dependent decrease in the obese-prone rats (P< 0·02).

Fig. 4 Effect of feeding groups (lean-prone (+/?)-free-fed (Lean-FF, □), obese-prone (cp/cp)-free-fed (Obese-FF, ■) and obese-prone (cp/cp)-pair-fed ()) on the arcuate nucleus neuropeptide expression levels for neuropeptide Y (NPY) and pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) and plasma leptin concentrations of pre-weanling, weanling and young adult JCR:LA-cp rats. Values were significantly different from those of the Lean-FF rats: * P< 0·05; ** P< 0·01; *** P< 0·001. Values were significantly different from those of the Obese-FF rats: † P< 0·05; ††† P< 0·001.

Plasma leptin concentrations were higher in the obese-prone rats regardless of age. In the pre-weanling cohort, plasma leptin concentrations in the obese-prone pups were five times greater than those in the lean-prone pups (P< 0·01; Fig. 4(c)). This genotype difference increased substantially with age. Plasma leptin concentrations in the obese-prone rats were twenty-eight times and eighty times higher than those in the lean-prone rats at weaning and adulthood, respectively (P< 0·001; Fig. 4(c)). Finally, the Obese-PF rats had significantly lower plasma leptin concentrations than the Obese-FF rats (P< 0·05).

Discussion

The present study shows, for the first time, that in the ARC POMC expression differs by age and genotype, while NPY expression is only genotype dependent in animals with a nonsense mutation in the leptin receptor. In contrast, in animals with a missense mutation in the leptin receptor gene (Zucker fa/fa rats), NPY expression is both genotype- and age-dependent( Reference Beck, Burlet and Bazin 22 ) – indicating that the onset of NPY expression up-regulation in obese-prone animals is a function of the mutant leptin receptor. At postnatal day 10, obese-prone JCR rats exhibited higher NPY expression than the lean-prone rats, but no difference in POMC expression. At this age, it is difficult to link NPY expression to feeding, as the determination of energy intake (milk consumption) in suckling rats is very difficult. The high fat mass found in the obese-prone rats, however, may be related to the metabolic and anti-thermogenic effects of NPY( Reference Godbole, York and Bloxham 27 ).

The difference in NPY expression by genotype remained in the weanling cohort, but we detected a difference in POMC expression, with obese-prone pups exhibiting down-regulation compared with the lean-prone rats. One possibility is that the onset of overeating and body weight gain in obese-prone animals is more related to the down-regulation of the expression of POMC, an anorexigenic peptide, than to the activation of NPY alone. Furthermore, the difference in POMC expression in obese-prone and lean-prone weanling pups coincides with the change from dams' milk to chow diet at weaning. One possibility is that the shift to solid food may combine with genotype to reduce POMC expression at weaning. The results obtained for the young adult cohort support the POMC down-regulation hypothesis of obesity; at this age, the POMC concentrations of the obese-prone rats were further suppressed compared with those of the lean-prone rats, coinciding with the onset of obesity and metabolic syndrome in the young adult obese-prone rats. It is possible that the down-regulation of POMC mRNA expression in the ARC is central for the development of obesity in JCR rats, a finding reported previously for tubby mice( Reference Guan, Yu and Van der Ploeg 28 ). POMC is also an important anorexigenic regulator of feeding behaviour. In fact, POMC neurons are suppressed by NPY, and NPY-induced feeding behaviour is related to the suppression of POMC signalling( Reference Kageyama, Takenoya and Hirako 29 ). One implication is that the down-regulation of POMC expression observed after weaning involves the suppressive effects of NPY on POMC neurons, leading to high energy intake in weanling and young adult obese-prone rats.

Leptin regulates arcuate hypothalamic neurons directly by binding to the ObR receptor long isoform (LRb), activating Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (JAK-STAT3) signalling and suppressing the activation of NPY neurons( Reference Dhillon, McFadden and Chalmers 30 ). Thus, the early NPY overexpression observed in the pre-weanling obese-prone rats could be linked to the absence of functional leptin receptors. Leptin also induces the expression of uncoupling proteins-1, -2 and -3 in the mitochondria, thereby leading to increased thermogenesis( Reference Scarpace, Matheny and Pollock 31 ). In contrast, rodents without leptin receptors, but with intact NPY and POMC genes, exhibit hyperphagia and decreased thermogenesis( Reference Luo, Marcelin and Liu 32 ). However, animals lacking both leptin receptors and NPY/POMC genes do not exhibit obesity( Reference Schutz, Bessard and Jéquier 33 ), indicating that functional NPY/POMC genes are necessary for the development of obesity. Moreover, a number of studies have reported that diet-induced thermogenesis, accounting for 5–15 % of total daily energy expenditure in humans( Reference Luo, Marcelin and Liu 32 ), is impaired in obese-prone subjects( Reference Segal, Edaño and Tomas 34 , Reference Segal, Edaño and Blando 35 ). Thus, overfeeding in weanling and young adult obese-prone rats together with a low thermogenic response may be a contributing factor for energy storage in the cp/cp animals. Glucocorticoid excess, a marker of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis activity/reactivity( Reference Dallman, Akana and Pecoraro 36 ), has also been observed to be associated with obesity in the present study. As glucocorticoids influence the transcription of hypothalamic neuropeptides( Reference Liu, Song and Sheikhahmadi 37 ), the down-regulation of POMC expression in cp/cp animals is probably related to elevated plasma corticosterone concentrations in these animals. The higher plasma corticosterone concentrations of weanling Lean-FF rats compared with the concentrations of the Obese-FF rats is indicative of the high stress induced by maternal separation in lean-prone animals( Reference Yoo, Ryu and Park 38 ). Thus, a functional leptin pathway in the lean-prone rats is associated with the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis response to maternal separation, but without leptin regulation, obese-prone (ObR absent) rats exhibit a reduced stress response after weaning. As corticosterone concentrations were measured on day 25, one possibility is that the stress of maternal separation is related to the shift from dams' milk to solid food. When shifted, the obese-prone rats adapted to the change in feeding more rapidly than the lean-prone rats, exhibiting higher energy intake and body weight over the first few days following weaning. This rapid adaptation of the obese-prone rats to the change in feeding would account for the low HPA axis activity in these rats when separated from their mothers.

POMC expression down-regulation is often accompanied by physiological and metabolic changes( Reference Williams, Bing and Cai 20 ). In the weanling cohort, with free access to food, the high energy consumption of obese-prone rats was associated with body weight gain and increased plasma insulin and lipid concentrations. Furthermore, the percentage of fat mass was greater in the pre-weanling pups than in the weanling pups regardless of the genotype. This age group difference may reflect metabolic and endocrine traits not fully established in neonates( Reference Hammon, Steinhoff-Wagner and Schönhusen 39 ), making the regulation of energy metabolism inefficient. Under chow diet, from weaning to adulthood, gains in body weight were predominately related to fat mass in the Obese-FF rats, while gains were associated with fat-free mass in the Lean-FF rats. Similar differences have been reported for obese-prone Fischer (F344) rats and Lou obesity-resistant rats( Reference Blum and Hammon 40 ).

A new finding was that the weanling cp/cp pups exhibited lower E EFF than the lean-prone weanling pups. The lower E EFF observed in the weanling Obese-FF pups, despite higher energy intake and body weight, may be related to the energy required to process the excess food. Notably, reduction in E EFF has been observed for rats on a high-fat diet and interpreted as a way to resist the development of obesity( Reference Abdoulaye, Wetzler and Goubern 41 ), occurring mostly during the growth period of 0–30 d.

With regard to pair-feeding, an imposed energy restriction( Reference Russell, Proctor and Kelly 24 ), the present results indicate that the young adult cp/cp rats had significantly reduced plasma lipid concentrations. Long-term severe food restriction (12 g/d) reduces the plasma TAG concentrations of cp/cp rats (largely in the VLDL fraction) and prevents end-stage CVD( Reference Russell and Proctor 8 ). In the present study, we showed that a modest energy restriction also significantly reduces plasma cholesterol (15 %) and TAG (62 %) concentrations of Obese-PF rats compared with those of the Obese-FF rats. Low plasma lipid concentrations in the Obese-PF rats were associated with increased NPY and reduced POMC expressions, which are known to trigger food intake( Reference Henry, Ghibaudi and Gao 42 ). However, due to the pair-feeding procedure that makes food availability intermittent, the catabolic pathway is also activated to produce energy, explaining the reduction in WAT mass and TAG concentrations in the Obese-PF rats. The high NPY expression in the Obese-PF rats is also consistent with the increase in the locomotion of these rats, attesting the role of NPY in the regulation of appetitive ingestive behaviour such as locomotion or food-related travel when food is scarce( Reference Nergårdh, Ammar and Brodin 43 ). One possibility is that pair-feeding activated the catabolic pathway, explaining the low WAT mass and TAG concentrations in the Obese-PF rats.

Overall, we have shown that in the ARC NPY mRNA expression is up-regulated in pre-weanling obese-prone suckling rats. This NPY overexpression in obese-prone suckling rats is similar to that in weanling and young adult rats with well-established features of the metabolic syndrome. A difference in POMC expression between lean-prone and obese-prone rats occurs after weaning and it is age dependent. These findings suggest that overeating-induced obesity and associated metabolic syndrome in rats with no functional leptin receptors may be the consequence of the down-regulation of POMC expression in the ARC in the presence of established NPY overexpression, suggesting that POMC plays a crucial role in energy homeostasis.

Acknowledgements

The present study was funded by a grant from the National Sciences and Engineering Research to Council of Canada (NSERC) to W. D. P. and C. D. H.; the Alberta Livestock Industry Development Fund and NSERC supported the research of S. D. P.

The Alberta Livestock Industry Development Fund and NSERC had no role in the design and analysis of the study or in the writing of this article.

The authors' contributions were as follows: A. D., W. D. P. and S. D. P. were responsible for the conception and design of the research; A. D. conducted the experiments; A. D., D. R. and W. D. P. analysed the data and interpreted the results of the experiments; A. D. and J. C. R. prepared the figures; A. D. drafted the manuscript; D. F. V., C. D. H., J. C. R., W. D. P. and S. D. P. edited and revised the manuscript; D. F. V., C. D. H., J. C. R., D. R., W. D. P. and S. D. P. approved the final version of the manuscript.

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, to declare.

References

1 Lobstein, T, Baur, L & Uauy, R (2004) Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev 1, 4104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Popkin, BM, Conde, W, Hou, N, et al. (2006) Is there a lag globally in overweight trends for children compared with adults? Obesity 14, 18461853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Must, A & Anderson, SE (2003) Effects of obesity on morbidity in children and adolescents. Nutr Clin Care 6, 412.Google ScholarPubMed
4 Fagot-Campagna, A, Pettitt, DJ, Engelgau, MM, et al. (2000) Type 2 diabetes among North American children and adolescents: an epidemiologic review and a public health perspective. J Pediatr 136, 664672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Flynn, MA, McNeil, DA, Maloff, B, et al. (2006) Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations. Obes Rev 1, 766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Schousboe, K, Visscher, PM, Erbas, B, et al. (2004) Twin study of genetic and environmental influences on adult body size, shape, and composition. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28, 3948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Qi, L & Cho, YA (2008) Gene–environment interaction and obesity. Nutr Rev 66, 684694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Russell, JC & Proctor, SD (2006) Small animal models of cardiovascular disease: tools for the study of the roles of metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Pathol 15, 318330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Bates, SH & Myers, MG Jr (2003) The role of leptin receptor signaling in feeding and neuroendocrine function. Trends Endocrinol Metab 14, 447452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Ingvartsen, KL & Boisclair, YR (2001) Leptin and the regulation of food intake, energy homeostasis and immunity with special focus on periparturient ruminants. Domest Anim Endocrinol 21, 215250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Wu-Peng, XS, Chua, SC Jr, Okada, N, et al. (1997) Phenotype of the obese Koletsky (f) rat due to Tyr763Stop mutation in the extracellular domain of the leptin receptor (Lepr): evidence for deficient plasma-to-CSF transport of leptin in both the Zucker and Koletsky obese rat. Diabetes 1997, 513518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Takaya, K, Ogawa, Y, Hiraoka, J, et al. (1996) Nonsense mutation of leptin receptor in the obese spontaneously hypertensive Koletsky rat. Nat Genet 14, 130131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Brindley, DN & Russell, JC (2002) Animal models of insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease: some therapeutic approaches using JCR:LA-cp rat. Diabetes Obes Metab 4, 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Breier, BH, Vickers, MH, Ikenasio, BA, et al. (2001) Fetal programming of appetite and obesity. Mol Cell Endocrinol 185, 7379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Page, KC, Malik, RE, Ripple, JA, et al. (2009) Maternal and postweaning diet interaction alters hypothalamic gene expression and modulates response to a high-fat diet in male offspring. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 297, R1049R1057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Kenasio-Thorpe, BA, Breier, BH, Vickers, MH, et al. (2007) Prenatal influences on susceptibility to diet-induced obesity are mediated by altered neuroendocrine gene expression. J Endocrinol 193, 3137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Levin, BE & Govek, E (1998) Gestational obesity accentuates obesity in obesity-prone progeny. Am J Physiol 275, R1374R1379.Google ScholarPubMed
18 McMillen, IC, Adam, CL & Mühlhäusler, BS (2005) Early origins of obesity: programming the appetite regulatory system. J Physiol 565, 917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Grove, KL & Smith, MS (2003) Ontogeny of the hypothalamic neuropeptide Y system. Physiol Behav 79, 4763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Williams, G, Bing, C, Cai, XJ, et al. (2001) The hypothalamus and the control of energy homeostasis: different circuits, different purposes. Physiol Behav 74, 683701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Chua, SC Jr, Chung, WK, Wu-Peng, XS, et al. (1996) Phenotypes of mouse diabetes and rat fatty due to mutations in the OB (leptin) receptor. Science 271, 994996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22 Beck, B, Burlet, A, Bazin, R, et al. (1993) Elevated neuropeptide Y in the arcuate nucleus of young obese Zucker rats may contribute to the development of their overeating. J Nutr 123, 11681172.Google Scholar
23 Yamashita, T, Murakami, T, Iida, M, et al. (1997) Leptin receptor of Zucker fatty rat performs reduced signal transduction. Diabetes 46, 10771078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24 Russell, JC, Proctor, SD, Kelly, SE, et al. (2008) Pair feeding-mediated changes in metabolism: stress response and pathophysiology in insulin-resistant, atherosclerosis-prone JCR:LA-cp rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 294, E1078E1087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25 Doyon, C, Denis, RG, Baraboi, ED, et al. (2006) Effects of rimonabant (SR141716) on fasting-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and neuronal activation in lean and obese Zucker rats. Diabetes 55, 34033410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26 Poulin, AM & Timofeeva, E (2008) The dynamics of neuronal activation during food anticipation and feeding in the brain of food-entrained rats. Brain Res 1227, 128141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27 Godbole, V, York, DA & Bloxham, DP (1978) Developmental changes in the fatty (fafa) rat: evidence for defective thermogenesis preceding the hyperlipogenesis and hyperinsulinaemia. Diabetologia 15, 4144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28 Guan, XM, Yu, H & Van der Ploeg, LH (1998) Evidence of altered hypothalamic pro-opiomelanocortin/neuropeptide Y mRNA expression in tubby mice. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 59, 273279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29 Kageyama, H, Takenoya, F, Hirako, S, et al. (2012) Neuronal circuits involving neuropeptide Y in hypothalamic arcuate nucleus-mediated feeding regulation. Neuropeptides 4179, 103105.Google Scholar
30 Dhillon, SS, McFadden, SA, Chalmers, JA, et al. (2011) Cellular leptin resistance impairs the leptin-mediated suppression of neuropeptide Y secretion in hypothalamic neurons. Endocrinology 152, 41384147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31 Scarpace, PJ, Matheny, M, Pollock, BH, et al. (1997) Leptin increases uncoupling protein expression and energy expenditure. Am J Physiol 273, E226E230.Google ScholarPubMed
32 Luo, N, Marcelin, G, Liu, SM, et al. (2011) Neuropeptide Y and agouti-related peptide mediate complementary functions of hyperphagia and reduced energy expenditure in leptin receptor deficiency. Endocrinology 152, 883889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33 Schutz, Y, Bessard, T & Jéquier, E (1984) Diet-induced thermogenesis measured over a whole day in obese and nonobese women. Am J Clin Nutr 40, 542552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34 Segal, KR, Edaño, A & Tomas, MB (1990) Thermic effect of a meal over 3 and 6 h in lean and obese men. Metabolism 39, 985992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35 Segal, KR, Edaño, A, Blando, L, et al. (1990) Comparison of thermic effects of constant and relative caloric loads in lean and obese men. Am J Clin Nutr 51, 1421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36 Dallman, MF, Akana, SF, Pecoraro, NC, et al. (2007) Glucocorticoids, the etiology of obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Curr Alzheimer Res 4, 199204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37 Liu, L, Song, Z, Sheikhahmadi, A, et al. (2012) Effect of corticosterone on gene expression of feed intake regulatory peptides in laying hens. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 162, 8187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38 Yoo, SB, Ryu, V, Park, EY, et al. (2011) The arcuate NPY, POMC, and CART expressions responding to food deprivation are exaggerated in young female rats that experienced neonatal maternal separation. Neuropeptides 45, 343349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39 Hammon, HM, Steinhoff-Wagner, J, Schönhusen, U, et al. (2012) Energy metabolism in the newborn farm animal with emphasis on the calf: endocrine changes and responses to milk-born and systemic hormones. Domest Anim Endocrinol 43, 171185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40 Blum, JW & Hammon, H (1999) Endocrine and metabolic aspects in milk-fed calves. Domest Anim Endocrinol 17, 219230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41 Abdoulaye, D, Wetzler, S, Goubern, M, et al. (2006) Comparison of energy balance in two inbred strains of rats: Fischer F344 prone to obesity and Lou rats resistant to obesity. Physiol Behav 87, 245250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42 Henry, M, Ghibaudi, L, Gao, J, et al. (2005) Energy metabolic profile of mice after chronic activation of central NPY Y1, Y2, or Y5 receptors. Obes Res 13, 3647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43 Nergårdh, R, Ammar, A, Brodin, U, et al. (2007) Neuropeptide Y facilitates activity-based-anorexia. Psychoneuroendocrinology 32, 493495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Effect of genotype on the (a) body weight, (b) energy intake (food consumption expressed as kJ/d) and (c) energy efficiency (EFF, efficiency of conversion to body mass) of weanling JCR:LA-cp rats for three post-weaning days. Values were significantly different from those of the lean-prone (+/?) rats: * P< 0·05; ** P< 0·01; *** P< 0·001. , Lean free-feeding; , obese free-feeding.

Figure 1

Table 1 Physiological and biochemical measures in pre-weanling, weanling and adult rats by feeding groups, lean-free-fed (FF), obese-FF and obese-pair-fed (PF)* (Mean values with their standard errors, n 8 per group)

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Effect of feeding groups (lean-prone (+/?)-free-fed (Lean-FF, ), obese-prone (cp/cp)-free-fed () and obese-prone (cp/cp)-pair-fed (Obese-PF, )) on the (a) body weight, (b) energy intake (food consumption expressed as kJ/d) and (c) energy efficiency (efficiency of conversion to body mass) of JCR:LA-cp rats from 8 to 12 weeks of age (young adults). Statistical differences among the experimental groups are described in the Results section. Note that the variance in energy intake (b) of the Lean-FF and Obese-PF rats was smaller than the size of the symbols and thus not readily visible in the figure. Values were significantly different from those of the Lean-FF rats: * P< 0·05; ** P< 0·01; *** P< 0·001. Values were significantly different from those of the Obese-PF rats: ††P< 0·01; ††† P< 0·001.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Effect of feeding groups (lean-prone (+/?)-free-fed (Lean-FF, □), obese-prone (cp/cp)-free-fed (Obese-FF, ■) and obese-prone (cp/cp)-pair-fed ()) on RER, heat production (prod) and relative activity in the light and dark phases for weanling and 12-week-old JCR:LA-cp rats. Values were significantly different from those of Lean-FF rats: * P< 0·05; ** P< 0·01; *** P< 0·001. † Values were significantly different from those of the Obese-FF rats (P< 0·05).

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Effect of feeding groups (lean-prone (+/?)-free-fed (Lean-FF, □), obese-prone (cp/cp)-free-fed (Obese-FF, ■) and obese-prone (cp/cp)-pair-fed ()) on the arcuate nucleus neuropeptide expression levels for neuropeptide Y (NPY) and pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) and plasma leptin concentrations of pre-weanling, weanling and young adult JCR:LA-cp rats. Values were significantly different from those of the Lean-FF rats: * P< 0·05; ** P< 0·01; *** P< 0·001. Values were significantly different from those of the Obese-FF rats: † P< 0·05; ††† P< 0·001.