Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:44:41.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The digestion of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne cv. Melle) and white clover (Trifolium repens cv. Blanca) by grazing cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. J. Ulyatt ,
D. J. Thomson ,
D. E. Beever ,
R. T. Evans  and
M. J. Haines
M. J. Ulyatt
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley Research Station, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks. SL6 5LR
D. J. Thomson
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley Research Station, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks. SL6 5LR
D. E. Beever
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley Research Station, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks. SL6 5LR
R. T. Evans
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley Research Station, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks. SL6 5LR
M. J. Haines
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley Research Station, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks. SL6 5LR
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Pure swards of perennial ryegrass (Loliwn perenne cv. Melle) as a primary growth (May), trimmed primary growth (early June) and regrowth (late June), and white clover (Trifolium repens cv. Blanca) as a mature primary growth (July) and vegetative regrowth (August), were grazed by twelve Friesian steers (mean body-weights throughout experiment 152–231 kg) at daily allocation rates of forage which provided dry matter (DM) intakes ranging from 28 to 36 g/kg body-weight).

2. Total nitrogen contents of the three ryegrasses declined with season (37–20 g/kg DM), but in vitro organic matter (OM) digestibilities were relatively constant (0.76–0.79). The clovers had higher N (average 366 g/kg DM) and lower fibre and water-soluble carbohydrate contents than the grasses, and in vitro OM digestibilities of 0.70 and 076 respectively.

3. Duodenal digesta samples were obtained, using a portable sampling apparatus from the animals grazing the pasture, and estimates of the flow of nutrients into the small intestine were derived using two indigestible markers which were continuously infused into the rumen using a portable infusion apparatus. Forage intakes were calculated from estimates of faecal output of indigestible OM and the predicted in vivo OM digestibilities of the forages consumed. Coefficients of variation for OM flow to the small intestine and OM intake were 11.8 and 10.9 % respectively.

4. The apparent digestion of OM in the rumen ranged from 722 to 741 g/kg digestible OM intake and from 681 to 711 g/kg digestible OM intake for the grass and clover diets respectively. Substantial losses of ingested N before the small intestine were measured on all diets except the regrowth ryegrass. Losses were 0.30 and 040 g/g N intake on the primary growth ryegrass and the regrowth clover respectively; N contents were 37 and 39 g/kg DM respectively.

5. Comparison of the values obtained at pasture with that obtained when similar diets were offered to housed cattle (Beever et al. 1985) indicated that combined relations relating duodenal OM and non-ammonia-N (NAN) flows to OM and N intakes respectively could be established for each diet. For two diets (primary-growth grass and regrowth clover) the relations were curvilinear; for the remaining diets, the derived relations were linear.

6. The effects of forage species, stage of maturity and variations in the stem: leaf ratio in the grasses, on nutrient supply in grazing animals are discussed, and a combined relation for all grazed and harvested forages examined in this and in a previous study reported by Beever et al. (1985) is established. The relation Y = 1.430 - 0.0169X (r072, residual sd 0.140). where Y is NAN flow/N intake (g/g) and X is N content in the crop (gfkg OM), indicates that net losses of N across the rumen will occur on diets which contain more than 25.5 g N/kg OM.

7. Possible limitations in the techniques available to measure nutrient digestion and supply in grazing ruminants are discussed.

Type
General Nutrition Papers
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , July 1988 , pp. 137 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1988

References

Agricultural Research Council (1980) The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock Famham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Baker, R. D. (1978). Proceedings of the British Grassland Society 119–126.Google Scholar
Baker, R. D., Alvarez, F. & Ledu, Y. L. P. (1981) Grass and Forage Science 36, 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N. & Manley, T. W. (1984) British Journal of Nutrition 51, 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, N. N., Manley, S. R., Davis, S. R. & Redekopp, C. (1982). In Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production, Occasional Publication of the British Society of Animal Production no. 6, pp. 146–148 [Thomson, D.J., Beever, D. E. and Gunn, R. G., editors]. Thames Ditton: British Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Bartlett, M. S. (1937) Proceedings of the Royal Society 160, 262–282.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Cammell, S. B. & Wallace, A. S. (1974) Proceedings of The Nutrition Society 33, 73A.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Dhanoa, M. S., Losada, H. R., Evans, R. T., Cammell, S. B. & France, J. (1986 a) British Journal of Nutrition 56, 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E., Losada, H. R., Cammell, S. B., Evans, R. T. & Haines, M J. (1986 b) British Journal of Nutrition 56. 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E., Losada, H. R., Gale, D. L., Spooner, M. C. & Dhanoa, M. S. (1987) British Journal of Nutrition 57, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E. & Siddons, R. C. (1986). In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants. Proceedings of VIth International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology, pp. 479–497 [Milligan, L.P., Grovum, W. L. and Dobson, A., editors]. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Terry, R. A., Cammell, S. B. & Wallace, A. S. (1978) Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 463–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J. & Cammell, S. B. (1976) Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J., Ulyatt, M. J., Cammell, S. B. & Spooner, M. C. (1985) British Journal of Nutrition 54, 763–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. L., Dawes, S. T., Colebrook, W. F. & James, K. J. (1979) Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, Australia 4, 126.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L., Furnival, E. P., Inskip, M. W., Perez, C. J. & Pickering, F. S. (1976) Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 11, 329–332.Google Scholar
Cruikshank, G. J., Poppi, D. P. & Sykes, A. R. (1985) Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 45, 113–116.Google Scholar
Evans, C. C., MacRae, J. C. & Wilson, S. (1977) Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. T., Hayes, D. G. & Beever, D. E. (1981 a) Laboratory Practice 30, 591–593.Google Scholar
Evans, R. T., Skelton, K. V. & Beever, D. E. (1981 b) Laboratory Practice 30, 997–1000.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 277–291. [McDonald, I.W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Hogan, J. P. & Weston, R. H. (1970). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 474–485 [Phillipson, A. T., editor]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Kotb, A. R. & Luckey, T. D. (1972) Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 42, 813–845.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 320–332. [McDonald, I.W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C. & Ulyatt, M. J. (1974) Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E., Haines, M. J., Cammell, S. B., Evans, R. T., Dhanoa, M. S. & Austin, A. R. (1984) Journal of Dairy Research 52, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E., Harrison, D. G., Hill, I. W. & Osbourn, D. F. (1971) Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 30, 14A.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J. & Egan, A. R. (1979) Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 605–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J. & MacRae, J. C. (1974) Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verite, R., Remond, B. & Journet, M. (1984). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64, Suppl., 328–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar