Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:06:06.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digestion of concentrate and of hay diets in the stomach and intestines of ruminants

1. Sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. H. Topps ,
R. N. B. Kay  and
E. D. Goodall
J. H. Topps
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
R. N. B. Kay
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
E. D. Goodall
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The flow of digesta to the abomasum and through the duodenum and terminal ileum was measured over 24 h periods in sheep. Pelleted diets of concentrates, principally composed of barley, and of poor-quality hay were given. The seven Scottish Blackface ewes studied were all fitted with rumen cannulas, and in addition two had simple abomasal cannulas, one a re-entrant abomasal cannula, two re-entrant duodenal cannulas, and two re-entrant ileal cannulas.

2. Paper impregnated with chromium sesquioxide was given twice daily by rumen fistula. The amounts of dry matter, starch, cellulose, total nitrogen and energy passing through the abomasum, duodenum and ileum and the amounts excreted in the faeces were measured. The flows of digesta were adjusted to give 100% recovery of chromium sesquioxide and the extent of digestion in various parts of the alimentary tract was calculated using these adjusted values. Concentrations of glucose in the blood and of volatile fatty acids (VFA) in the rumen were also measured.

3. For the concentrate diet, 69% of the digestible dry matter disappeared in the stomach (reticulo-rumen, omasum and abomasum), 17% in the smail intestine and 14% in the large intestine. Values for disappearance of digestible energy were 72% in the stomach, 23% in the small intestine and 5% in the large intestine. Of the 298 g starch fed daily only 6–35 g passed through the abomasum or duodenum and only 1–4 g reached the terminal ileum. The cellulose in the diet was poorly digested.

4. For the hay diet, 67% of the digestible dry matter disappeared in the stomach, 22% in the small intestine and 11% in the large intestine. Values for disappearance of digestible energy were 81% in the stomach, 7% in the small intestine and 12% in the large intestine. Of the 33 g of starch consumed daily, from 5 to 13 g passed through the abomasum or duodenum. The cellulose in the hay was 59% digestible and virtually all this digestion took place in the stomach.

5. The concentration of VFA and the proportion of propionate in the rumen fluid, 2·5 h after feeding, were considerably greater on the concentrate diet than on the hay diet, but diet had little influence on the concentration of blood glucose.

6. The importance of the small amount of starch passing to the sheep's small intestine is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , May 1968 , pp. 261 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1968

References

Annison, E. F., Hill, K. J. & Lewis, D. (1957). Biochem. J. 66, 592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. (1965). In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant, p. 272. [Dougherty, R. W., editor.] London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Ash, R. W. (1962 a). Anim. Prod. 4, 309.Google Scholar
Ash, R. W. (1962 b). J. Physiol., Lond. 164, 4P.Google Scholar
Balch, D. A. & Rowland, S. J. (1957). Br. J. Nutr. 11, 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bath, I. H. & Rook, J. A. F. (1963). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 61, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belasco, I. J. (1956). J. Anim. Sci. 15, 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1962). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Bruce, J., Goodall, E. D., Kay, R. N. B., Phillipson, A. T. & Vowles, L. E. (1966). Proc. R. Soc. B 166, 46.Google Scholar
Christian, K. R. & Coup, M. R. (1954). N. Z. Jl Sci. Tech. A 36, 328.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. M. W., Ellinger, G. M. & Phillipson, A. T. (1966). Proc. R. Soc. B 166, 63.Google Scholar
Clegg, K. M. (1956). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 7, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Maynard, L. A. (1938). J. Nutr. 15, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duthie, I. F. (1959). Lab. Pract. 8, 408.Google Scholar
Goodall, E. D. & Kay, R. N. B. (1965). J. Physiol., Lond. 176, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, L. E. & Phillipson, A. T. (1962). Anim. Prod. 4, 97.Google Scholar
Heald, P. J. (1951). Br. J. Nutr. 5, 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J. P. (1964). Aust. J. agric. Res. 15, 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J. P. & Phillipson, A. T. (1960). Br. J. Nutr. 14, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggett, A. St G. & Nixon, D. A. (1957). Lancet ii, 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, A. T. & Martin, A. J. P. (1952). Biochem. J. 50, 679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, J. C. & Armstrong, D. G. (1966). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 25, xxxiii.Google Scholar
Phillips, G. D. & Dyck, G. W. (1964). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 44, 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, A. T. (1952). J. Physiol., Lond. 116, 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, P. & Singleton, A. G. (1965). Biochem. J. 96, 59P.Google Scholar
Porter, P. & Singleton, A. G. (1966). J. Physiol., Lond. 186, 145P.Google Scholar
Ridges, A. P. & Singleton, A. G. (1962). J. Physiol., Lond. 161, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sineshchekov, A. D. (editor) (1953). Fiziologiya pitaniya sel'skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh. Moscow: Sel'khozgiz. (The nutritional physiology of farm animals. English translation 1964. National Lending Library for Science and Technology, Boston Spa, Yorkshire.)Google Scholar
Topps, J. H., Kay, R. N. B., Goodall, E. D., Whitelaw, F. G. & Reid, R. S. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, R. E., Little, C. O., Mitchell, G. E., Hayes, B. W. & Karr, M. R. (1966). J. Anim. Sci. 25, 911.Google Scholar
Weller, R. A. & Gray, F. V. (1954). J. exp. Biol. 31, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, P. L., Grainger, R. B. & Marco, G. J. (1966). J. Nutr. 89, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar