Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:58:19.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digestibility and metabolic utilisation of dietary energy in adult sows: influence of addition and origin of dietary fibre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

G. Le Goff ,
L. Le Groumellec ,
J. van Milgen ,
S. Dubois  and
J. Noblet
G. Le Goff
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte de Recherches sur le Veau et le Porc, 35590 St Gilles, France
L. Le Groumellec
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte de Recherches sur le Veau et le Porc, 35590 St Gilles, France
J. van Milgen
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte de Recherches sur le Veau et le Porc, 35590 St Gilles, France
S. Dubois
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte de Recherches sur le Veau et le Porc, 35590 St Gilles, France
J. Noblet*
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte de Recherches sur le Veau et le Porc, 35590 St Gilles, France
*
*Corresponding author: Dr J. Noblet, fax +33 2 23 48 50 80, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

According to a 4×4 Latin square design, four adult ovariectomised sows fed at a similar energy level (516 kJ ME/kg body weight (BW)0·75 per d) received one of four diets successively: a control low-dietary-fibre (DF) diet (diet C, 100 g total DF/kg DM) and three fibre-rich diets (200 g total DF/kg DM) that corresponded to a combination of diet C and maize bran (diet MB), wheat bran (diet WB), or sugar-beet pulp (diet SBP). Sows were adapted to the diet for 12 d before an 8 d measurement period. Digestibility of energy and nutrients in the diets, and total heat production (HP) and its components (fasting HP, activity HP and thermic effect of feeding (TEF), were measured. The TEF was partitioned between a short-term component (TEFst) and a long-term component (TEFlt). Total tract digestibility of nutrients and energy was greater for diet C; among the three other diets, the digestibility coefficients were higher for diet SBP than for diets MB and WB. Energy losses from CH4 were linearly related to the digestible total DF intake (+1·4 kJ/g). Fasting HP at zero activity averaged 260 kJ/kg BW0·75 per d. Activity HP represented 20 % total HP, or 83 kJ/kg BW0·75 per d on average. Total TEF and TEFlt were higher (P<0·05) for diet WB than for the other diets. However, total HP (406 kJ/kg BW0·75 per d) was not significantly affected by diet characteristics. Our results suggest that metabolic utilisation of dietary energy is little affected by the addition and origin of DF, at least under the conditions of the present study.

Keywords

SowsHeat productionEnergy valueDietary fibre
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 87 , Issue 4 , April 2002 , pp. 325 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2002

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1990) Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed. Washington DC: AOAC.Google Scholar
Bach Knudsen, KE & Canibe, N (2000) Breakdown of plant carbohydrates in the digestive tract of pigs fed on wheat- or oat-based rolls. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 80, 1261.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach Knudsen, KE & Hansen, JA (1991) Gastrointestinal implications in pigs of wheat and oat fractions I. Digestibility and bulking properties of polysacharides and other major constituents. British Journal of Nutrition 65, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau Interprofessionel d'Etudes Analytiques (1976) Recueil des méthodes d'analyse des Communautés Européennes (Analytical methods in the European Community) pp. 105–111. Gennevilliers: BIPEA.Google Scholar
Brouns, F, Edwards, SA & English, PR (1995) Influence of fibrous feed ingredients on voluntary intake of dry sows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 54, 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, E (1965) Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In Energy Metabolism. Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium held at Troon, Scotland, May, 1964. European Association for Animal Production Publication no. 11, pp. 441–443 [Blaxter, KL, editor]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carré, B & Brillouet, JM (1986) Yield and composition of cell wall residues isolated from various feedstuffs used for non-ruminant farm animal. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 37, 341–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabeauti, E, Noblet, J & Carré, B (1991) Digestion of plant cell walls from four different sources in growing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 32, 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, WH, Noblet, J & Heavens, RP (1985) Studies on the energy metabolism of the pregnant sow. 2. The partition and utilization of metabolizable energy intake in pregnant and non-pregnant animals. British Journal of Nutrition 53, 267–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronin, GM, van Tartwijk, MFM, van der Hel, W & Verstegen, MWA (1986) The influence of degree of adaptation to tether-housing by sows in relation to behaviour and energy metabolism. Animal Production 42, 257–268.Google Scholar
Central Veevoederbureau (1998) Veevoedertabel (Feeding Tables). Leylystad: Central Veevoederbureau in Nederland.Google Scholar
Dierick, NA, Vervaeke, IJ, Demeyer, DI & Decuypere, JA (1989) Approach to the energetic importance of fibre digestion in pigs. 1. Importance of fermentation in the overall energy supply. Animal Feed Science and Technology 23, 141–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etienne, M (1987) Utilization of high fibre feeds and cereals by sows. Livestock Production Science 16, 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etienne, M, Noblet, J, Dourmad, JY & Castaing, J (1997) Digestive utilization of feeds in lactating sows. Comparison with growing pigs. In Digestive Physiology in Pigs, pp. 583–586[Laplace, JP, Février, and Barbeau, A, editors]. Saint-Malo: INRA.Google Scholar
European Economic Community (1972) Analytical determination of starch. In Official Journal of European Communities L123/7. Brussels: EEC.Google Scholar
Graham, H, Hesselman, K & Åman, P (1986) The influence of wheat bran and sugar-beet pulp on the digestibility of dietary components in a cereal-based pig diet. Journal of Nutrition 116, 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillon, F, Auffret, A, Robertson, JA, Thibault, JF & Barry, JL (1998) Relationships between physical characteristics of sugar-beet fibre and its fermentability by human faecal flora. Carbohydrate Polymers 37, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, H, Bach Knudsen, KE & Theil, PK (2001) Effect of dietary fibre on energy metabolism of growing pigs and pregnant sows. In Energy Metabolism in Animals, European Association for Animal Production Publication no. 103, pp. 105–108 [Chwalibog, A and Jakobsen, K, editors]. Wageningen: Wageningen Pers.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, H, Zhao, XQ & Eggum, BO (1996) The influence of dietary fibre and environmental temperature on the development of the gastrointestinal tract, digestibility, degree of fermentation in the hind-gut and energy metabolism in pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 75, 365–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirchgessner, M, Kreuzer, M, Machmüller, A & Roth-Maier, DA (1994) Evidence for a high efficiency of bacterial protein synthesis in the digestive tract of adult sows fed supplements of fibrous feedstuffs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 46, 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, AB & Terlouw, EMC (1993) A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 71, 2815–2825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Goff, G & Noblet, J (2001) Comparative total tract digestibility of dietary energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2418–2427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J & Bach Knudsen, KE (1997) Comparative digestibility of wheat, maize and sugar beet pulp non-starch polysaccharides in adult sows and growing pigs. In Digestive Physiology in Pigs, European Association for Animal Production Publication no. 88, pp. 571–574 [Laplace, JP, Février, C and Barbeau, A, editors]. Saint-Malo: INRA.Google Scholar
Noblet, J & Bourdon, D (1997) Valeur énergétique comparée de onze matières premières chez le porc en croissance et la truie adulte (Comparative energy values of eleven feedstuffs in growing pigs and adult sows). Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France 29, 221–226.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Dourmad, JY, Etienne, M & Le Dividich, (1997) Energy metabolism in pregnant sows and newborn pigs. Journal of Animal Science 75, 2708–2714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J, Fortune, H, Dubois, S & Henry, Y (1989) Nouvelles Bases d'Estimation des Teneurs en énergie Digestible, Métabolisable et Nette des Aliments pour le Porc (New approaches for estimating digestible, metabolisable and net energy values in pig feeds). Paris: INRA.Google Scholar
Noblet, J & Le Goff, (2001) Effect of dietary fibre on the energy value of feeds for pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noblet, J & Shi, XS (1993) Comparative digestibility of energy and nutrients in growing pigs fed ad libitum and adult sows fed at maintenance. Livestock Production Science 34, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noblet, J & Shi, XS (1994) Effect of body weight on digestive utilization of energy and nutrients of ingredients and diets in pigs. Livestock Production Science 37, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noblet, J, Shi, XS & Dubois, S (1993 a) Metabolic utilization of dietary energy and nutrients for maintenance energy requirements in sows: basis for a net energy system. British Journal of Nutrition 70, 407–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J, Shi, XS & Dubois, S (1993 b) Energy cost of standing activity in sows. Livestock Production Science 34, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olesen, CS, Jørgensen, H & Danielsen, V (2001) Effect of dietary fibre on digestibility and energy metabolism in pregnant sows. Acta Agricultura Scandinavica 51, 200–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosky, L, Asp, NG, Schweizer, TF, DeVries, JW & Furda, I (1988) Determination of insoluble, soluble, and total dietary fiber in foods and food products: Interlaboratory study. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 71, 1017–1023.Google ScholarPubMed
Ramonet, Y, Meunier-Salaün, MC & Dourmad, JY (1999) High-fiber diets in pregnant sows: digestive utilization and effects on behavior of the animals. Journal of Animal Science 77, 591–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramonet, Y, van Milgen, J, Dourmad, JY, Meunier-Salaün, MC & Noblet, J (2000) The effect of dietary fibre on energy utilisation and partitioning of heat production over pregnancy in sows. British Journal of Nutrition 84, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rijnen, MMJA, Verstegen, MWA, Heetkamp, MJW, Haaksma, J & Schrama, JW (2001) Effect of dietary fermentable carbohydrates on energy metabolism in group-housed sows. Journal of Animal Science 79, 148–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saulnier, L & Thibault, JF (1999) Ferulic acid and diferulic acids as components of sugar-beet pectins and maize bran heteroxylans. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 79, 396–402.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrama, JW, Bosch, MW, Verstegen, MWA, Vorselaars, AHPM, Haaksma, J & Heetkamp, MJW (1998) The energetic value of nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to physical activity in group-housed, growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 76, 3016–3023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrama, JW, Verstegen, MWA, Verboeket, PHJ, Schutte, JB & Haaksma, J (1996) Energy metabolism in relation to physical activity in growing pigs as affected by type of dietary carbohydrate. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2220–2225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, XS (1993) Effect of body weight or physiological status on digestive and metabolic utilization of energy in pigs. PhD Thesis, University of Rennes I.Google Scholar
van Milgen, J & Noblet, J (2000) Modelling energy expenditure in pigs. In Modelling Nutrient Utilization in Farm Animals, pp. 103–114 [McNamara, JP, France, J and Beever, DE, editors]. Oxford: CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Milgen, J, Noblet, J, Dubois, S & Bernier, JF (1997) Dynamic aspects of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production in swine. British Journal of Nutrition 78, 397–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Soest, PJ & Wine, RH (1967) Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 50, 50–55.Google Scholar
Vermorel, M, Bouvier, JC, Bonnet, Y & Fauconneau, G (1973) Construction et fonctionnement de 2 chambres respiratoires du type $$$circuit ouvert$$$ pour jeunes bovins (Construction and operation of two open-circuit respiration chambers for young cattle). Annales de Biologie Animale, Biochimie, Biophysique 13, 659–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittemore, CT, Smith, WC & Phillips, P (1988) Fatness, live weight and performance responses of food level in pregnancy. Animal Production 47, 123–130.Google Scholar
Yan, T, Longland, AC, Close, WH, Sharpe, CE & Keal, HD (1995) The digestion of dry matter and non-starch polysaccharides from diets containing plain sugar-beet pulp or wheat straw by pregnant sows. Animal Science 61, 305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar