Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:20:29.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diet in pregnancy

3.* Diet in relation to the course and outcome of pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. M. Thomson
A. M. Thomson
Affiliation:
Obstetric Medicine Research Unit (Medical Research Council), University of Aberdeen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , December 1959 , pp. 509 - 525
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1959

References

Baird, D. (1952 a). New Engl. J. Med. 246, 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, D. (1952 b). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 63, 1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, D. & Thomson, A. M. (1954). Gynaecologia, 138, 226.Google Scholar
Balfour, M. I. (1944). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2, 27.Google Scholar
Bernard, R. M. (1952). Edinb. Med. J. 59, Proc. Edinb. Obstet. Soc. p. 1.Google Scholar
Berry, K. & Wiehl, D. G. (1952). Milbank mem. Fd quart. Bull. 30, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, B. S., Beal, V. A., Kirkwood, S. B. & Stuart, H. C. (1943). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 46, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, B. S., Harding, V. V. & Stuart, H. C. (1943). J. Pediat. 23, 506.Google Scholar
Cameron, C. S. & Graham, S. (1944). Glasg. med. J. 24, 1.Google Scholar
Chesley, L. C. (1944). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 48, 565.Google Scholar
Dieckmann, W. J., Turner, D. F., Meiller, E. J., Savage, L. J., Hill, A. J., Straube, M. T., Pottinger, R. E. & Rynkiewicz, L. M. (1951). J. Amer. diet. Ass. 27, 1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, E. H. L., Baird, D. & Thomson, A. M. (1952). J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Emp. 59, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbs, J. H., Tisdall, F. F. & Scott, W. A. (1941). J. Nutr. 22, 515.Google Scholar
Ehrenfest, H. (1919). Amer. J. Obstet. Dis. Wom. 80, 441.Google Scholar
Green, H. N., Pindar, D., Davis, G. & Mellanby, E. (1931). Brit. med. J. ii, 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlin, R. H. J. (1952). Lancet, 262, 64.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1944). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2, 8.Google Scholar
Hipsley, E. H. (1953). Brit. med. J. ii, 420.Google Scholar
Hobson, W. (1948). J. Hyg., Camb., 46, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hytten, F. E. (1951). Arch. Dis. Child. 26, 477.Google Scholar
Hytten, F. E. (1954 a). Brit. med. J. ii, 844.Google Scholar
Hytten, F. E. (1954 b). Brit. med. J. ii, 1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hytten, F. E. & Duncan, D. L. (1956). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 26, 855.Google Scholar
Hytten, F. E. & Thomson, A. M. (1955). Brit. med. J. ii, 232.Google Scholar
Hytten, F. E. & Thomson, A. M. (1960). In Milk: the Mammary Gland and its Secretion. [Kon, S. K. and Cowie, A. T., editors.] New York: Academic Press Inc. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Hytten, F. E., Yorston, J. C. & Thomson, A. M. (1958). Brit. med. J. i, 310.Google Scholar
Jeans, P. C., Smith, M. B. & Steams, G. (1955). J. Amer. diet. Ass. 31, 576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitch, I. (1957). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 16, 38.Google Scholar
McCarrison, R. (1937). Brit. med. J. ii, 256.Google Scholar
McGanity, W. J., Cannon, R. O., Bridgforth, E. B., Martin, M. P., Densen, P. M., Newbill, J. A., McClellan, G. S., Christie, A., Peterson, J. C. & Darby, W. J. (1954). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 67, 501.Google Scholar
Mack, H. C., Kelly, H. J. & Macy, I. G. (1956). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 71, 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macy, I. G., Moyer, E. Z., Kelly, H. J., Mack, H. C., Di Loreto, P. C. & Pratt, J. P. (1954). J. Nutr. 52, Suppl. 1.Google Scholar
Marr, J. W., Hope, E. B., Stevenson, J. D. & Thomson, A. M. (1955). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 14, vii.Google Scholar
Martin, M. P., Bridgforth, E., McGanity, W. J. & Darby, W. J. (1957). J. Nutr. 62, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellanby, E. (1933). Lancet, 225, 1131.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. R. (1955). J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Emp. 62, 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutrition Society (1944 a). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1, 226–48.Google Scholar
Nutrition Society (1944 b). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2, 1–68.Google Scholar
Paton, D. N. (1903). Lancet, ii, 21.Google Scholar
People's League of Health (1946). J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Emp. 53, 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, B. S. (1947). Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 40, 379.Google Scholar
Slemons, J. M. (1919). Amer. J. Obstet. Dis. Wom. 80, 194.Google Scholar
Smith, C. A. (1947). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 53, 599.Google Scholar
Sontag, L. W. & Wines, J. (1947). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 54, 994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speert, H., Graff, S. & Graff, A. M. (1951). Amw. J. Obstet. Gynec. 62, 1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theobald, G. W. (1937). Lancet, 232, 1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. M. (1958). Brit. J. Nutr. 12, 446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. M. (1959 a). Brit. J. Nutr. 13, 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. M. (1959 b). Eugen. Rev. 51, 157.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. M. & Billewicz, W. Z. (1955). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 14, v.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. M. & Billewicz, W. Z. (1957). Brit. med. J. i, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. M. & Duncan, D. L. (1954). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 24, 1.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. M. & Thomson, W. (1948–9). Brit. J. Nutr. 2, 290.Google Scholar
Williams, P. F. & Fralin, F. G. (1942). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 43, 1.Google Scholar
Woodhill, J. M., van den Berg, A. S., Burke, B. S. & Stare, F. J. (1955). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 70, 987.Google Scholar