Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:50:20.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of consumer probiotics for the US market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2019

Mary E. Sanders
Mary E. Sanders*
Affiliation:
Dairy and Food Culture Technologies, Littleton, CO 80122, USA California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Curiosity about probiotic bacteria is high. This is not surprising given the rapid growth of the natural products market in the USA, which was 22% in 1995 (New Hope Natural Media, Boulder, CO). Although probiotic cultures are only one component of that market, this trend shows that consumers in the USA are increasingly taking a pro-active stance towards their health and are purchasing products not only to eliminate what is perceived as dietary negatives but to increase the levels of dietary positives (Wrick, 1995). This shift in consumer attitude bodes well for the development of the American probiotic market. This article describes the composition, promotion and labelling of probiotic-containing products, discusses attributes of commercial probiotic bacteria, and estimates the size of the probiotic market in the USA. This market information was obtained from several published (Anon, 1996a,b)and unpublished but commercially available (SPINS Information Services, San Francisco, CA and New Hope Natural Media, Boulder, CO) sources.

Keywords

ProbioticLactobacilliFunctional foods
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 80 , supplement S2: Pre- and Probiotics: Where are We Today? , October 1998 , pp. S213 - S218
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1998

References

Anon (1996 a) Nutraceutical debate to define industry future. Nutrition Business Journal 1, 1–3.Google Scholar
Anon (1996 b) Leaders stake out market for cultures. Nutrition Business Journal 1, 4–5.Google Scholar
Anon (1997) Another world giant signs up for LGG. Valio LTD Newsletter ‘Milkshake’. Valio Ltd, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
Charteris, WP, Kelly, PM, Morelli, L & Collins, JK (1997) Selective detection, enumeration and identification of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in mixed bacterial populations. International Journal of Food Microbiology 35, 1–27.10.1016/S0168-1605(96)01222-6Google Scholar
Dave, RI & Shah, NP (1997 a) Viability of yoghurt and probiotic bacteria in yoghurts made from commercial starter cultures. International Dairy Journal 7, 31–41.10.1016/S0958-6946(96)00046-5Google Scholar
Dave, RI & Shah, NP (1997 b) Effectiveness of ascorbic acid as an oxygen scavenger in improving viability of probiotic bacteria in yoghurts made with commercial starter cultures. International Dairy Journal 7, 435–443.10.1016/S0958-6946(97)00026-5Google Scholar
Dave, RI & Shah, NP (1997 c) Effect of cysteine on the viability of yoghurt and probiotic bacteria in yoghurts made with commercial starter cultures. International Dairy Journal 7, 537–545.10.1016/S0958-6946(97)00053-8Google Scholar
Giese, J & Katz, F (1997) Ethical marketing of functional foods. Food Technology 51, 58–61.Google Scholar
Gorski, D (1998) Kefir and colostrum beverage. Dairy Foods 99, 45.Google Scholar
Greenberg, PD & Cello, JP (1996) Treatment of severe diarrhea caused by Cryptosporidium parvum with oral bovine immunoglobulin concentrate in patients with AIDS. Journal of AIDS and Human Retrovirology 13, 348–354.Google Scholar
Hughes, VL & Hillier, SL (1990) Microbiologic characteristics of Lactobacillus products used for colonization of the vagina. Obstetrics and Gynecology 75, 244–248.Google Scholar
Kailasapathy, K & Rybka, S (1997) L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. – their therapeutic potential and survival in yogurt. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 52, 28–35.Google Scholar
Klaver, FAM, Kingma, F & Weerkamp, AH (1993) Growth and survival of bifidobacteria in milk. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 47, 151–164.Google Scholar
McFarland, LV & Elmer, GW (1997) Pharmaceutical probiotics for the treatment of anaerobic and other infections. Anaerobe. 3, 73–78.Google Scholar
Onggo, I & Fleet, GH (1994) Media for the isolation and enumeration of lactic acid bacteria from yoghurts. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 48, 89–92.Google Scholar
Rybka, S & Fleet, GH (1997) Populations of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium species in Australian yoghurts. Food Australia 49, 471–475.Google Scholar
Salvadori, BB (1997) Dairy starter cultures of lactic acid bacteria (LA). Standard of identity. Annex A. Guidelines for Methods of Analyses. IDF Standard 149A, International Dairy Federation, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Sanders, ME (1996) Probiotic cultures and human health. In Germfree Life and its Ramifications [Hashimoto, K, editor]. XII ISG Puglishing Committee, Shiozawa, Japan.Google Scholar
Sanders, ME, Walker, DC, Walker, KM, Aoyama, K & Klaenhammer, TR (1996) Performance of commercial cultures in fluid milk applications. Journal of Dairy Science 79, 943–955.Google Scholar
Shah, NP (1997) Isolation and enumeration of bifidobacteria in fermented milk products – a review. Milchwissenschaft-Milk Science International 52, 72–76.Google Scholar
Stephan, W, Dichtelmuller, H & Lissner, R (1990) Antibodies from colostrum in oral immunotherapy. Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry 28, 19–23.Google Scholar
Wrick, KL (1995) Consumer issues and expectations for functional foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 35, 167–173.Google Scholar