Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:24:52.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Description of a human direct calorimeter, with a note on the energy cost of clerical work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Joan D. Webster ,
Gillian Welsh  and
J. S. Garrow
Joan D. Webster
Affiliation:
Nutrition Research Group, Clinical Research Centre, Watford Road, Harrow HA1 3UJ
Gillian Welsh
Affiliation:
Nutrition Research Group, Clinical Research Centre, Watford Road, Harrow HA1 3UJ
J. S. Garrow
Affiliation:
Nutrition Research Group, Clinical Research Centre, Watford Road, Harrow HA1 3UJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A heat-sink calorimeter, suitable for the measurement of energy expenditure in human subjects over periods up to 26 h, is described.

2. The performance of the calorimeter is illustrated by a study of four normal subjects at rest or performing clerical work for a period of 7.5 h. Each condition was measured in duplicate in each subject. On the resting days the subjects were recumbent, and on the working days they were seated throughout the measurement period. Heart rate was monitored by infra-red telemetry and physical activity by an ultrasound movement detector. Urinary cortisol excretion was also measured as an indicator of stress.

3. In each subject the mean heat loss on working days was higher than that on resting days: the increase ranged from 5.1 % to 16.7, with a mean value of 10.0% (P = 0.015). There was no significant difference between resting and working days in heart rate, physical activity or urinary cortisol excretion.

4. The present study confirms that tiring clerical work has very little effect on 24 h energy expenditure.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1986

References

REFERENCES

Benedict, F. G. & Benedict, C. G. (1933) Carnegie Institute Publication no. 446.Google Scholar
Blaza, S. E. & Garrow, J. S. (1980). Proceedings ofthe Nutrition Society 39, 13A.Google Scholar
Blaza, S. E. & Garrow, J. S. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 49, 171–180.Google Scholar
Corey, E. L. (1948). Journal of Applied Physiology 1, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landis, C. (1925). Americun Journal of Physiology 74, 188–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, T. A., Joiner, R. L. & Ryan, B. F. (1981). Minitub Reference Manual. Pennsylvania: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Seth, J. & Brown, L. M. (1978). Clinica Chimica Acta 86, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremoliere, J., Carr, L. & Naon, R. (1973). In Energy Balance in Man, pp. 1256–1134 [Apfelbaum, M., editor]. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Udalov, E. F. & Sibunev, A. G. (1964). Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 34, 524.Google Scholar
Warwick, P. M. (1978). The influence of physical activity on energy expenditure in man. phd thesis, University of london.Google Scholar
Weller, C. (1977). Journal of Physiology 267, 11–12P.Google Scholar