Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T14:15:37.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Degradation of transgenic DNA from genetically modified soyabean and maize in human intestinal simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

John Heritage
Affiliation:
Division of MicrobiologyUniversity of LeedsLeeds LS2 9JTUK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Invited commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2002

References

Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment (2002) ACRE open hearing on the criticisms of the risk assessment for T25 GM maize on-line. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/acre/hearing200202.htmGoogle Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (1990) Council Directive 90/220/EEC of 23 April 1990 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms. Official Journal of the European Communities L 117, 1527Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (1997 a) Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 1997 concerning novel foods and novel food ingredients. Official Journal of the European Communities L 043, 16Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (1997 b) Commission recommendation of 29 July 1997 concerning the scientific aspects and the presentation of information necessary to support applications for the placing on the market of novel foods and novel food ingredients and the preparation of initial assessment reports under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Communities L 253, 136Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (1997 c) Scientific committee on food opinion on the potential for adverse health effects from the consumption of genetically modified maize (Zea mays L.) (Expressed on 13 December 1996). Updated to include references 21 February 1997. http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/oldcomm7/out02_en.htmlGoogle Scholar
Duggan, PS, Chambers, PA, Heritage, J & Forbes, JM (2000) Survival of free DNA encoding antibiotic resistance from transgenic maize and the transformation activity of DNA in ovine saliva, ovine rumen fluid and silage effluent. FEMS Microbiology Letters 191, 7177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einspanier, R, Klotz, A, Kraft, J, Aulrich, K, Poser, R, Schwägele, F, Jahreis, G & Flachowsky, G (2001) The fate of forage plant DNA in farm animals: a collaborative case-study investigating cattle and chicken fed recombinant plant material. European Food Research and Technology 212, 129134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebhard, F & Smalla, K (1998) Transformation of Acinetobacter sp. strain BD413 by transgenic sugar beet DNA. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64, 15501554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henderson, B & Wilson, M (1998) Commensal communism and the oral cavity. Journal of Dental Research 77, 16741683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martín-Orúe, SM, O'Donnell, AG, Ariño, J, Netherwood, T, Gilbert, HJ & Mathers, JC (2002) Degradation of transgenic DNA from genetically modified soya and maize in human intestinal simulations. British Journal of Nutrition 87, 533542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercer, DK, Scott, KP, Bruce-Johnson, WA, Glover, LA & Flint, HJ (1999) Fate of free DNA and transformation of the oral bacterium Streptococcus gordonii DL1 by plasmid DNA in human saliva. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65, 610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercer, DK, Scott, KP, Melville, CM, Glover, LA & Flint, HJ (2001) Transformation of an oral bacterium via chromosomal integration of free DNA in the presence of human saliva. FEMS Microbiology Letters 200, 163167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal Society (1998) Genetically Modified Plants for Food Use and Human Health. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
Royal Society (2002) Genetically Modified Plants for Food Use and Human Health – An Update. Policy document 4/02. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar