Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:58:26.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concurrent validity of alcohol consumption measurement in a ‘healthy’ population; quantity-frequency questionnaire v. dietary history interview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Lando L. J. Koppes ,
Jos W. R. Twisk ,
Jan Snel  and
Han C. G. Kemper
Lando L. J. Koppes
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Jos W. R. Twisk
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Jan Snel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Han C. G. Kemper*
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author: Professor Dr Han C. G. Kemper, fax +31 20 444 8181, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Self-reports of alcohol consumption account for approximately 50 % of the reported sales of alcohol. In the absence of a gold standard, it is not known how accurately different methods of measurement reflect actual consumption and whether under-reporting varies among different populations. The objective of the present study was to compare the consumption reported by the widely used quantity-frequency questionnaire (QFQ) with that reported in a cross-check dietary history interview (DHI), which has higher face validity. In 171 male and 197 female subjects of the Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study (mean age 36 years), alcohol consumption was assessed by both the QFQ and the DHI. Most subjects reported a moderate consumption of alcohol by both measures. Spearman correlation coefficients were high (0·77 and 0·87 in men and women respectively). Overall, greater alcohol consumption was reported using the DHI. The difference between the DHI and QFQ reports was usually greater for wine than for beer. Backward stepwise regression analysis showed that the difference in reporting was positively related to a more irregular drinking pattern, and in wine drinkers to the square of the QFQ report. Sex, drinking alone or with others and the CAGE (acronym for four questions on drinking behaviour) score were not related to the difference in reporting. The precision of DHI estimation from QFQ reports and other factors was low. Serious questions arise as to the validity and precision of alcohol consumption measurements based on the QFQ alone. QFQ information may be improved by incorporating questions on the type of beverage and drinking patterns.

Keywords

Alcohol consumptionMeasurementValidityModification
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 88 , Issue 4 , October 2002 , pp. 427 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2002

References

Ewing, JA (1984) Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. Journal of the American Medical Association 252, 1905–1907.Google Scholar
Feunekes, GIJ, Van 't Veer, P, Van Staveren, WA & Kok, FJ (1999) Alcohol intake assessment: the sober facts. American Journal of Epidemiology 150, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzgerald, JL & Mulford, HA (1987) Self-report validity issues. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 48, 207–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemper, HCG (1985) Growth, health and fitness of teenagers: Longitudinal research in international perspective. Medicine and Sport Science 20, Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
Kemper, HCG (1995) The Amsterdam Growth and Health Study: A Longitudinal Analysis of Health, Fitness, and Lifestyle. HK Sport Science Monograph 6. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Koppes, LLJ, Kemper, HCG, Post, GB, Snel, J & Twisk, JWR (2000) Development and stability of alcohol consumption from adolescence into adulthood: the Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study. European Addiction Research 6, 183–188.Google Scholar
Kühlhorn, E & Leifman, H (1993) Alcohol surveys with high and low coverage rate: a comparative analysis of survey strategies in the alcohol field. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 54, 542–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemmens, PH (1994) The alcohol content of self-report and 'standard' drinks. Addiction 89, 593–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemmens, P, Tan, ES & Knibbe, RA (1992) Measuring quantity and frequency of drinking in a general population survey: a comparison of five indices. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 53, 476–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mensink, GBM, Hermann-Kunz, E & Thamm, M (1998) Der Ernährungssurvey (The nutrition survey). Gesundheitswesen 60, Suppl. 2, S83–S86.Google ScholarPubMed
Midanik, L (1982) The validity of self-reported alcohol consumption and alcohol problems: a literature review. British Journal of Addiction 77, 357–382.Google Scholar
Nederlands Economisch Instituut (1998) Alcoholgebruik in beeld; Standaardmeetlat (Alcohol consumption in focus; Standard measuring-staff). Rotterdam: NEI.Google Scholar
Pernanen, K (1974) Validity of survey data on alcohol use. In Research Advances in Alcohol and Drug Problems 1, pp. 355–374 [Gibbins, RJ, editor]. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Post, GB (1989) Nutrition in adolescence: a longitudinal study in dietary patterns from teenager to adult. Haarlem: De Vrieseborch.Google Scholar
Redman, S, Sanson-Fisher, RW, Wilkinson, C, Fahey, PP & Gibberd, RW (1987) Agreement between two measures of alcohol consumption. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 48, 104–108.Google Scholar
Rehm, J, Greenfield, TK, Walsh, G, Xie, X, Robson, L & Single, E (1999) Assessment methods for alcohol consumption, prevalence of high risk drinking and harm: a sensitivity analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology 28, 219–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romelsjö, A, Leifman, H & Nyström, S (1995) A comparative study of two methods for the measurement of alcohol consumption in the general population. International Journal of Epidemiology 24, 929–936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Single, E & Wortley, S (1994) A comparison of alternative measures of alcohol consumption in the Canadian National Survey of alcohol and drug use. Addiction 89, 395–399.Google Scholar
Wyllie, A, Zhang, J-F, & Casswell, S (1994) Comparison of six alcohol consumption measures from survey data. Addiction 89, 425–430.Google Scholar