Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:13:31.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compensatory nitrogen retention in growing pigs following a period of N deprivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. Bronwyn Tullis
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
C. T. Whittemore
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Patricia Phillips
Affiliation:
AFRC Unit of Statistics, Kings Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Semi-synthetic diets, with dried microbial cells (Pruteen) as the nitrogen source, were used to measure N retention in 50 kg pigs given different combinations of N intake involving periods of deprivation and enhanced supply.

2. Metabolic faecal N losses were 1.92 g/d (1.26 g/kg dry matter eaten) and endogenous urinary losses were 3.96 g/d for pigs given an N intake of 6.9 g/d.

3. Compensatory N retention averaging 4.2 g extra N/d was observed in pigs given enhanced N supply by diets providing 31.0, 60.4 and 93.4 g N/d. In some instances enhanced N retention was maintained for 22 d.

4. Pigs given enhanced N supply by extravagant N intake did not maintain the compensatory response which had been evident initially.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1986

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, D. G. & Mitchell, H. H. (1955). Journal of Animal Science 14, 4968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorman, K. N. (1980). In Protein deposition in animals, pp. 147166 [Buttery, P. J. and Lindsay, D. B., editors]. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, T. K. & Waterlow, J. C. (1974). British Journal of Nutrition 32, 353373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Mello, J. P. F., Peers, D. G. & Whittemore, C.T. (1976). British Journal of Nutrition 36, 403410.Google Scholar
Fowler, V. R. (1976). In Meat animals: growth and productivity, pp. 285299 [Lister, D., Rhodes, D. N., Fowler, V. R. and Fuller, M. F., editors]. London: Plenum press.Google Scholar
Garlick, P. J., Millward, D. J. & James, W. P. T. (1973). Biochemical Journal 136, 935945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, M. H. N., Waterlow, J. C. & Picou, D. (1977). Clinical Science and Molecular Medicine 53, 473477.Google Scholar
Holt, L. E., Halac, E. & Kajdi, C. N. (1962). Journal of the American Medical Association 181, 699705.Google Scholar
Mendes, C. B. & Waterlow, J. C. (1958). British Journal of Nutrition 12, 7488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millward, D. J., Garlick, P. J., James, W. P. T., Sender, P. & Waterlow, J. C. (1976). In Protein metabolism and nutrition, pp. 4969 [Cole, D. J. A., Boorman, K. N., Buttery, P. J., Lewis, D. and Swan, H., editors]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Nettleton, J. A. & Hegsted, D. M. (1975). Nutrition and Metabolism 18, 3140.Google Scholar
Norton, B. W. & Walker, D. M. (1971). British Journal of Nutrition 26, 713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picou, D. & Taylor-Roberts, T. (1969). Clinical Science and Molecular Medicine 36, 283296.Google Scholar
Tullis, J. B. (1981). Protein growth in pigs. phd thesis, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Vaughan, O. W., Filer, L. J. & Churella, H. (1962). Pediatrics 29, 9096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, F. & Bezeau, L. M. (1957). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 37, 95105.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C.T., Tullis, J. B. & Hastie, S. W. (1978). British Journal of Nutrition 39, 193200.Google Scholar