Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:49:38.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of procedures for assessing nitrogen retention in chicks*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

W. R. Sanslone  and
R. L. Squibb
W. R. Sanslone
Affiliation:
Laboratories of Disease and Environmental Stress, Rutgers, The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
R. L. Squibb
Affiliation:
Laboratories of Disease and Environmental Stress, Rutgers, The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , February 1962 , pp. 59 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1962

References

Ackerson, C. W., Blish, M. J. & Mussehl, R. E. (1935). Res. Bull. Nebr. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 80.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1955). Nutr. Rev. 13, 42.Google Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1955). Official Methods of Analysis, 8th ed. Washington: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Costa, G. (1960). Nature, Lond., 188, 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, E. G.,Jones, E. R. & Stanier, M. W. (1954). Brit. J. Nutr. 8, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (1949). Arch. Biochem. 21, 335.Google Scholar
Rand, N. T. (1957). The utilization of fat by the growing chick. Doctoral Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.Google Scholar
Sanslone, W. R. & Squibb, R. L. (1961). Poult. Sci. 40, 816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squibb, R. L. (1961). Poult. Sci. 40, 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, W. M. (1959). Fed. Proc. 18, 1125.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. & McCance, R. A. (1956). Brit. J. Nutr. 10, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar